Is direct seeded rice a boon for economic performance? Empirical evidence from India

被引:41
作者
Mishra, Ashok K. [1 ]
Khanal, Aditya R. [2 ]
Pede, Valerien O. [3 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Kemper & Ethel Marley Fdn, Chair Morrison Sch Agribusiness, WP Carey Sch Business, 235M Sarum Hall,7231 E Sonoran Arroyo Mall, Mesa, AZ 85212 USA
[2] Tennessee State Univ, Coll Agr, Dept Agr & Environm Sci, 3500 John A Merritt Blvd, Nashville, TN 37209 USA
[3] Int Rice Res Inst, Social Sci Div, DAPO Box 7777, Manila, Philippines
关键词
Impact assessment; Puddled transplant rice (PTR); Direct-seeded rice (DSR); Smallholders; Switching regression; India; WEED-CONTROL; AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY; PRODUCTIVITY; MANAGEMENT; ESTABLISHMENT; ADOPTION; IMPACTS; WELFARE; YIELD; INTENSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.08.021
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
The direct-seeded rice (DSR) establishment method can improve productivity and labor efficiency while taking into account the soil and hydrologic conditions of the field, the availability of appropriate land equipment, and irrigation-drainage systems. Using plot- and household-level data, we analyze the impacts of DSR adoption in two rice-growing states of India. We account for observed and unobserved heterogeneity using endogenous switching regression. We analyze the yield and costs effects of DSR adoption. Our study shows a small but significant effect of DSR adoption on yield and costs. We find increase in rice yields (by 3.74%) for DSR adopters; an increase in rice yields (by 6.79%) if the DSR method were adopted on puddled transplant rice (PTR) parcels. We find a 7.51% reduction in total costs for DSR adopters; a decrease in total costs (by 3.71%) if the DSR method was adopted on PTR parcels. DSR farmers can significantly reduce their fertilizer and land preparation costs. Hence, the decision to adopt DSR may help households with limited resources to reduce their cost of production without compromising the yield.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 18
页数:9
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Akhter Ali Akhter Ali, 2014, Development Studies Research, V1, P244
[2]   The effects of education on agricultural productivity under traditional and improved technology in northern Nigeria: an endogenous switching regression analysis [J].
Alene, Arega D. ;
Manyong, V. M. .
EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 32 (01) :141-159
[3]   Comparison of Different Methods of Rice Establishment and Nitrogen Management Strategies for Lowland Rice [J].
Ali, M. Akkas ;
Ladha, J. K. ;
Rickman, J. ;
Lales, J. S. .
JOURNAL OF CROP IMPROVEMENT, 2006, 16 (1-2) :173-189
[4]   Welfare impacts of maize-pigeonpea intensification in Tanzania [J].
Amare, Mulubrhan ;
Asfaw, Solomon ;
Shiferaw, Bekele .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 43 (01) :27-43
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Rice Almanac, V4th
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1986, LTD DEPENDENT QUALIT
[7]   Effect of Difference Weed Control Methods to Yield of Lowland Rice In The SOBARI [J].
Antralina, Merry ;
Istina, Ida Nur ;
YuyunYuwariah ;
Simarmata, Tualar .
FIRST INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON FOOD AND AGRO-BIODIVERSITY CONDUCTED BY INDONESIAN FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS COMMUNITY, 2015, 3 :323-329
[8]   Impact of modern agricultural technologies on smallholder welfare: Evidence from Tanzania and Ethiopia [J].
Asfaw, Solomon ;
Shiferaw, Bekele ;
Simtowe, Franklin ;
Lipper, Leslie .
FOOD POLICY, 2012, 37 (03) :283-295
[9]  
Balasubramanian V., 2002, DIRECT SEEDING RES S, P15
[10]  
Barker R., 1998, OUTLOOK WATER RESOUR