Multihazard fragility assessment of steel-concrete composite frame structures with buckling-restrained braces subjected to combined earthquake and wind

被引:26
作者
Li, Hong-Nan [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Yang [1 ]
Li, Chao [1 ]
Zheng, Xiao Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Univ Technol, Fac Infrastruct Engn, State Key Laboratoy Coastal & Offshore Engn, 2 Linggong Rd, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China
[2] Shenyang Jianzhu Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Shenyang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
buckling-restrained braces; earthquake; multihazard fragility; steel-concrete composite frame structure; wind; SEISMIC FRAGILITY; HIGHWAY BRIDGES; BUILDINGS; MODEL; SIMULATION; PARAMETERS; MOTIONS; TURBINE; SURFACE; CURVES;
D O I
10.1002/tal.1746
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Engineering structures may inevitably be subjected to multiple natural hazards (such as earthquakes and winds) during their life cycles. This paper presents an efficient multihazard fragility methodology based on the structural demand models. The approach is applied to two steel-concrete composite frame structures (SCCFSs), with and without buckling-restrained braces (BRBs), aiming to evaluate the effect of BRBs on controlling the structural responses and fragilities under the combined earthquake and wind loads. In total, 120 earthquake records are selected, and 120 sets of wind drag force time histories are simulated by considering the spatial variation along the height of the exemplar building. The combined "earthquake-wind" events are stochastically assembled, in which the intensities of these two hazards are modeled using the Monte Carlo simulation. The OpenSees platform is employed to calculate the dynamic responses of the SCCFSs with and without BRBs under simultaneous earthquake and wind loads. The goodness of fits of the first-, second-, and third-order polynomial in predicting the structural demand are evaluated, and the optimal polynomial is employed to generate the multihazard fragility surfaces at different damage states. The numerical results indicate that the structural responses and fragilities under the combined earthquake and wind are higher than those under an individual hazard, while the influencing extent varies with the relative intensities of these two hazards. The impact of multiple hazards and the control effect of BRBs on the structural responses and fragilities are systematically quantified and discussed in details.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, design of structures for earthquake resistance-part 2: bridges (EN 1998-2 2005)
[2]   Fragility analysis of a 5-MW NREL wind turbine considering aero-elastic and seismic interaction using finite element method [J].
Asareh, Mohammad-Amin ;
Schonberg, William ;
Volz, Jeffery .
FINITE ELEMENTS IN ANALYSIS AND DESIGN, 2016, 120 :57-67
[3]  
ASCE, 2005, 705 ASCE
[4]  
ASCE, 2016, ASCE/SEI 7-16, DOI DOI 10.1061/9780784414248
[5]  
BEHNAM B, 2013, STRUCTURAL DESIGN TA, V23, P1083
[6]   Life-Cycle Performance of Deteriorating Structural Systems under Uncertainty: Review [J].
Biondini, Fabio ;
Frangopol, Dan M. .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 142 (09)
[8]  
Chinese Standard, 2010, GB 50011
[9]  
Chinese Standard, 2012, GB 50009
[10]   Safety of Structures in Strong Winds and Earthquakes: Multihazard Considerations [J].
Duthinh, Dat ;
Simiu, Emil .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2010, 136 (03) :330-333