Investigating the link between transaction and computational costs in a blockchain environment

被引:64
作者
Jabbar, Abdul [1 ]
Dani, Samir [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Huddersfield, Dept Logist Mkt Hospitality & Analyt, Learning Dev, Huddersfield, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Huddersfield, Huddersfield Business Sch, Dept Logist Mkt Hospitality & Analyt, Huddersfield, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Blockchain; computational costs; operational transaction costs; smart contracts; supply chain; SUPPLY-CHAIN; TECHNOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; WILL;
D O I
10.1080/00207543.2020.1754487
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The research and thinking pertaining to blockchain have thus far focused on cryptocurrency and Bitcoin. However, there is increased interest in using the technology to solve operational challenges in manufacturing and service supply chains. In this study, we introduce a new implication of using blockchain technology and propose two unique contributions. First, we introduce the notion of computational costs (measured in units of gas) as an essential mechanism for completing operational transactions in the blockchain environment. Second, we discuss the use of smart contracts and their influence on operational transactions. To investigate the link between blockchain transaction and computational costs, this study uses an experimental methodology. We develop and implement a fully functional virtual public blockchain to store, validate, and maintain transactions. The methodology provides a process to measure the computational costs, frequency, and intensity of transactions. This research contributes to conceptual research on the blockchain implementation paradigm. Its novelty stems from the identification of computational costs for operational transactions and use of an experimental methodology. This research provides managers an insight into the design of smart contract transactions in a supply chain from a cost perspective.
引用
收藏
页码:3423 / 3436
页数:14
相关论文
共 52 条
[21]   Improving home care: Knowledge creation through engagement and design [J].
Groop, Johan ;
Ketokivi, Mikko ;
Gupta, Mahesh ;
Holmstrorm, Jan .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2017, 53-56 :9-22
[22]  
HASTIG GM, 2019, PRODUCTION OPERATION
[23]  
Hukkinen T, 2019, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 52ND ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES, P6875
[24]  
JABBAR A, 2019, IND MARKETING MANAGE
[25]   Understanding the Blockchain technology adoption in supply chains-Indian context [J].
Kamble, Sachin ;
Gunasekaran, Angappa ;
Arha, Himanshu .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2019, 57 (07) :2009-2033
[26]   Toward an ontology-driven blockchain design for supply-chain provenance [J].
Kim, Henry M. ;
Laskowski, Marek .
INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS IN ACCOUNTING FINANCE & MANAGEMENT, 2018, 25 (01) :18-27
[27]   Hawk: The Blockchain Model of Cryptography and Privacy-Preserving Smart Contracts [J].
Kosba, Ahmed ;
Miller, Andrew ;
Shi, Elaine ;
Wen, Zikai ;
Papamanthou, Charalampos .
2016 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON SECURITY AND PRIVACY (SP), 2016, :839-858
[28]  
Lansiti M, 2017, HARVARD BUS REV, V95, P119
[29]   ManuChain: Combining Permissioned Blockchain With a Holistic Optimization Model as Bi-Level Intelligence for Smart Manufacturing [J].
Leng, Jiewu ;
Yan, Douxi ;
Liu, Qiang ;
Xu, Kailin ;
Zhao, J. Leon ;
Shi, Rui ;
Wei, Lijun ;
Zhang, Ding ;
Chen, Xin .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2020, 50 (01) :182-192
[30]   Makerchain: A blockchain with chemical signature for self-organizing process in social manufacturing [J].
Leng, Jiewu ;
Jiang, Pingyu ;
Xu, Kailin ;
Liu, Qiang ;
Zhao, J. Leon ;
Bian, Yiyang ;
Shi, Rui .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 234 :767-778