Error Mitigation for Deep Quantum Optimization Circuits by Leveraging Problem Symmetries

被引:14
作者
Shaydulin, Ruslan [1 ]
Galda, Alexey [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Argonne Natl Lab, Math & Comp Sci Div, Lemont, IL 60439 USA
[2] Menten AI Inc, Palo Alto, CA 94303 USA
[3] Univ Chicago, James Franck Inst, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[4] Argonne Natl Lab, Computat Sci Div, Lemont, IL 60439 USA
来源
2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON QUANTUM COMPUTING AND ENGINEERING (QCE 2021) / QUANTUM WEEK 2021 | 2021年
关键词
quantum computing; error mitigation; quantum optimization; Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm;
D O I
10.1109/QCE52317.2021.00046
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
High error rates and limited fidelity of quantum gates in near-term quantum devices are the central obstacles to successful execution of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA). In this paper we introduce an application-specific approach for mitigating the errors in QAOA evolution by leveraging the symmetries present in the classical objective function to be optimized. Specifically, the QAOA state is projected into the symmetry-restricted subspace, with projection being performed either at the end of the circuit or throughout the evolution. Our approach improves the fidelity of the QAOA state, thereby increasing both the accuracy of the sample estimate of the QAOA objective and the probability of sampling the binary string corresponding to that objective value. We demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed methods on QAOA applied to the MaxCut problem, although our methods are general and apply to any objective function with symmetries, as well as to the generalization of QAOA with alternative mixers. We experimentally verify the proposed methods on an IBM Quantum processor, utilizing up to 5 qubits. When leveraging a global bit-flip symmetry, our approach leads to a 23% average improvement in quantum state fidelity.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 300
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Abraham H., 2019, QISKIT OPEN SOURCE F, DOI DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.2562110
  • [2] Quantum Computer Systems for Scientific Discovery
    Alexeev, Yuri
    Bacon, Dave
    Brown, Kenneth R.
    Calderbank, Robert
    Carr, Lincoln D.
    Chong, Frederic T.
    DeMarco, Brian
    Englund, Dirk
    Farhi, Edward
    Fefferman, Bill
    Gorshkov, Alexey, V
    Houck, Andrew
    Kim, Jungsang
    Kimmel, Shelby
    Lange, Michael
    Lloyd, Seth
    Lukin, Mikhail D.
    Maslov, Dmitri
    Maunz, Peter
    Monroe, Christopher
    Preskill, John
    Roetteler, Martin
    Savage, Martin J.
    Thompson, Jeff
    [J]. PRX QUANTUM, 2021, 2 (01):
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2019, IEEE HIGH PERF EXTR, DOI DOI 10.1109/hpec.2019.8916288
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2021, **DROPPED REF**
  • [5] Improving Variational Quantum Optimization using CVaR
    Barkoutsos, Panagiotis Kl.
    Nannicini, Giacomo
    Robert, Anton
    Tavernelli, Ivano
    Woerner, Stefan
    [J]. QUANTUM, 2020, 4
  • [6] Optimal, reliable estimation of quantum states
    Blume-Kohout, Robin
    [J]. NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2010, 12
  • [7] Low-cost error mitigation by symmetry verification
    Bonet-Monroig, X.
    Sagastizabal, R.
    Singh, M.
    O'Brien, T. E.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2018, 98 (06)
  • [8] Bravyi S., 2020, ARXIV201206074
  • [9] Clifford Circuit Optimization with Templates and Symbolic Pauli Gates
    Bravyi, Sergey
    Shaydulin, Ruslan
    Hui, Shaohan
    Maslov, Dmitri
    [J]. QUANTUM, 2021, 5
  • [10] Obstacles to Variational Quantum Optimization from Symmetry Protection
    Bravyi, Sergey
    Kliesch, Alexander
    Koenig, Robert
    Tang, Eugene
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2020, 125 (26)