Haptic object matching by blind and sighted adults and children

被引:21
作者
Withagen, Ans [1 ]
Kappers, Astrid M. L. [2 ]
Vervloed, Mathijs P. J. [3 ]
Knoors, Harry [3 ,4 ]
Verhoeven, Ludo [3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Visio, Natl Fdn Visually Impaired & Blind, NL-1272 RX Huizen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Helmholtz Inst, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Sch Educ Sci, Inst Behav Sci, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Royal Kentalis, St Michielsgestel, Netherlands
关键词
Blind; Touch; Object identification; Child; Accuracy; Response times; CROSS-MODAL PLASTICITY; TACTILE PERCEPTION; CONGENITALLY BLIND; EXPLORATION; JUDGMENTS; CURVATURE; ACUITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.11.012
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The present study describes a tactual object matching task based on the study of Lederman and Klatzky (1987) for the dimensions Exact shape, Weight. Volume and Texture. Participants were congenitally blind children and their sighted classmates, congenitally blind adults and sighted adults. To study a possible effect of familiarity the task was performed four times. Based on Millar's CAPIN (Convergent Active Processes in Interrelated Networks) model of spatial processing (Millar, 1994) it was thought that this manipulation would add redundant information to the experiment from which the children and blind participants could benefit. The results showed that accuracy was affected more by age than visual status, especially for the dimension Exact Shape. With regard to response times, children were in most cases faster than adults, especially the sighted adults. Familiarization had a significant effect on response times for all dimensions. Extra exercise only increased accuracy for the dimension Texture. These results were generally in line with the CAPIN model. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 271
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Knowledge is not everything: Analysis of children's performance on a haptic comparison task [J].
Alexander, JM ;
Johnson, KE ;
Schreiber, JB .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 82 (04) :341-366
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1966, SENSES CONSIDERED PE
[3]   Exploratory behavior: A comparison of infants who are congenitally blind and infants who are sighted [J].
Bradley-Johnson, S ;
Johnson, CM ;
Swanson, J ;
Jackson, A .
JOURNAL OF VISUAL IMPAIRMENT & BLINDNESS, 2004, 98 (08) :496-502
[4]  
Bushnell E.W., 1991, PSYCHOL TOUCH, P139
[5]  
Bushnell EW, 1998, CLIN DEV MED, P144
[7]  
D'Angiulli A, 1998, SCAND J PSYCHOL, V39, P187
[8]   HAPTIC JUDGMENTS OF CURVATURE BY BLIND AND SIGHTED HUMANS [J].
DAVIDSON, PW .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1972, 93 (01) :43-&
[9]   HAPTIC EQUIVALENCE MATCHING OF CURVATURE BY BLIND AND SIGHTED HUMANS [J].
DAVIDSON, PW ;
WHITSON, TT .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1974, 102 (04) :687-690
[10]  
Gentaz E., 2003, TOUCHING KNOWING, P123