Pain and Discomfort during Flexible Nasolaryngoscopy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial Assessing the Efficacy of Oral Mouthwash and Topical Lidocaine

被引:5
作者
Bonaparte, James P. [1 ]
Corsten, Martin [1 ]
Odell, Michael [1 ]
Kilty, Shaun [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
laryngoscopy; otolaryngology; pain; DOUBLE-BLIND; NASENDOSCOPY; ANESTHESIA; PLACEBO;
D O I
10.2310/7070.2011.110012
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: To test the hypothesis that using Listerine mouthwash prior to administration of topical nasal lidocaine will result in improved pain and comfort outcomes during flexible nasolaryngoscopy (FNL). Design: Randomized, controlled trial. Subjects: A total of 120 patients were randomized to receive a combination of either treatment or placebo mouthwash followed by treatment or placebo nasal spray prior to an FNL examination. Outcome Measures: Pain and discomfort using a 100 mm visual analogue scale. Results: The use of lidocaine significantly reduced pain (p = .011) and discomfort (p = .008) compared to placebo nasal spray. Using Listerine prior to administration of lidocaine resulted in the largest reductions. Patients having an extended nasal examination reported more pain (p = .001) and discomfort (p = .03) levels while demonstrating a greater benefit of topical lidocaine compared to those undergoing a primary laryngeal examination (p < .001). Discussion: Using Listerine prior to application of lidocaine nasal spray reduces the pain and discomfort of FNL. This effect was most clinically significant in patients undergoing an extended or full bilateral nasal examination.
引用
收藏
页码:S13 / S20
页数:8
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   Reducing the Flavour of Oral Lidocaine: Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing the Efficacy of Mint-Flavoured Mouthwash [J].
Bonaparte, James P. ;
Corsten, Martin ;
Rourke, Ryan .
JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2010, 39 (01) :96-101
[2]   The use of topical nasal anaesthesia before flexible nasendoscopy: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing cophenylcaine with placebo [J].
Cain, AJ ;
Murray, DP ;
McClymont, LG .
CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2002, 27 (06) :485-488
[3]   Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Assessing the Effectiveness of Local Anesthetic, Vasoconstrictive, and Lubricating Agents in Flexible Fibre-optic Nasolaryngoscopy [J].
Conlin, Anne Elizabeth ;
McLean, Laurie .
JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2008, 37 (02) :240-249
[4]  
Frosh AC, 1998, CLIN OTOLARYNGOL, V23, P259
[5]   Cophenylcaine spray vs. placebo in flexible nasendoscopy: a prospective double-blind randomised controlled trial [J].
Georgalas, C ;
Sandhu, G ;
Frosh, A ;
Xenellis, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2005, 59 (02) :130-133
[6]   A prospective, double-blind, randomized study on the use of a topical anesthetic, vasoconstrictor and placebo during transnasal flexible fiberoptic endoscopy [J].
Leder, SB ;
Ross, DA ;
Briskin, KB ;
Sasaki, CT .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1997, 40 (06) :1352-1357
[7]   The taxonomy of pain [J].
Merskey, Harold .
MEDICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2007, 91 (01) :13-+
[8]   Nasal and instrument preparation prior to rigid and flexible nasendoscopy: a systematic review [J].
Nankivell, P. C. ;
Pothier, D. D. .
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2008, 122 (10) :1024-1028
[9]   The efficacy of topical anaesthesia in flexible nasendoscopy: a double-blind randomised controlled trial [J].
Sadek, SAA ;
De, R ;
Scott, A ;
Whiter, AP ;
Wilson, PS ;
Carlin, WV .
CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2001, 26 (01) :25-28