The Three Domains of Disgust Scale: Factor Structure, Psychometric Properties, and Conceptual Limitations

被引:88
|
作者
Olatunji, Bunmi O. [1 ]
Adams, Thomas [2 ]
Ciesielski, Bethany
David, Bieke
Sarawgi, Shivali
Broman-Fulks, Joshua [3 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Psychol, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[2] Univ Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
[3] Appalachian State Univ, Boone, NC 28608 USA
关键词
Three Domains of Disgust Scale; TDDS; factor structure; disgust; pathogen; moral; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; SEX-DIFFERENCES; SENSITIVITY; VALIDATION; RELIABILITY; COMPONENTS; INVENTORY; SYMPTOMS; EQUATION; INDEXES;
D O I
10.1177/1073191111432881
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This investigation examined the measurement properties of the Three Domains of Disgust Scale (TDDS). Principal components analysis in Study 1 (n = 206) revealed three factors of Pathogen, Sexual, and Moral Disgust that demonstrated excellent reliability, including test-retest over 12 weeks. Confirmatory factor analyses in Study 2 (n = 406) supported the three factors. Supportive evidence for the validity of the Pathogen and Sexual Disgust subscales was found in Study 1 and Study 2 with strong associations with disgust/contamination and weak associations with negative affect. However, the validity of the Moral Disgust subscale was limited. Study 3 (n = 200) showed that the TDDS subscales differentially related to personality traits. Study 4 (n = 47) provided evidence for the validity of the TDDS subscales in relation to multiple indices of disgust/contamination aversion in a select sample. Study 5 (n = 70) further highlighted limitations of the Moral Disgust subscale given the lack of a theoretically consistent association with moral attitudes. Lastly, Study 6 (n = 178) showed that responses on the Moral Disgust scale were more intense when anger was the response option compared with when disgust was the response option. The implications of these findings for the assessment of disgust are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 225
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Persian version of the parental bonding instrument: Factor structure and psychometric properties
    Behzadi, Behnaz
    Parker, Gordon
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2015, 225 (03) : 580 - 587
  • [32] Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire
    Ye, Niansi
    Peng, Ling
    Deng, Bei
    Hu, Hui
    Wang, Yuncui
    Zheng, Taoyun
    Ai, Yating
    Liu, Xueting
    Zhou, Shi
    Li, Yucan
    EARLY INTERVENTION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2025, 19 (01)
  • [33] Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Perceived Stress Scale in Russian adolescents
    Marakshina, Julia
    Adamovich, Timofey
    Vasin, Georgy
    Ismatullina, Victoria
    Lobaskova, Marina
    Malykh, Artem
    Kolyasnikov, Pavel
    Tabueva, Anna
    Zakharov, Ilya
    Malykh, Sergey
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [34] THE EMOTIONAL CONTAGION SCALE: FACTOR STRUCTURE AND PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES IN A PORTUGUESE SAMPLE
    Rueff-Lopes, Rita
    Caetano, Antonio
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2012, 111 (03) : 898 - 904
  • [35] Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Swedish version of the Perceived Stress Scale
    Eklund, Mona
    Backstrom, Martin
    Tuvesson, Hanna
    NORDIC JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 68 (07) : 494 - 499
  • [36] Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of the Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children in an African American Adolescent Sample
    Kingery, Julie Newman
    Ginsburg, Golda S.
    Burstein, Marcy
    CHILD PSYCHIATRY & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2009, 40 (02) : 287 - 300
  • [37] “Psychometric properties and factor structure of the attitudes to fertility and childbearing scale (AFCS) in a sample of polish women”
    Karolina Kossakowska
    Malin Söderberg
    Current Psychology, 2021, 40 : 3125 - 3135
  • [38] Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Irrational Procrastination Scale: Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance Across Gender
    Shaw, Amy
    Zhang, Jennifer J.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [39] Psychometric properties and factor structure of the attitudes to fertility and childbearing scale (AFCS) in a sample of polish women
    Kossakowska, Karolina
    Soderberg, Malin
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 40 (07) : 3125 - 3135
  • [40] Factor structures and psychometric properties of three brief versions of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale in the Korean population
    Kim, Gyumyoung
    Yim, Minkyung
    Bae, Hayoung
    Hur, Ji-Won
    BMC PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 12 (01)