Does childhood emotional abuse moderate the effect of cognitive behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy versus meta-cognitive therapy in depression? A propensity score analysis on an observational study

被引:5
作者
Klein, Jan Philipp [1 ]
Dale, Rachel [2 ]
Glanert, Sarah [1 ]
Grave, Ulrike [1 ]
Surig, Svenja [1 ]
Zurowski, Bartosz [1 ]
Borgwardt, Stefan [1 ]
Schweiger, Ulrich [1 ]
Fassbinder, Eva [1 ]
Probst, Thomas [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lubeck, Dept Psychiat Psychosomat & Psychotherapy, Translat Psychiat Unit, D-23538 Lubeck, Germany
[2] Danube Univ Krems, Dept Psychotherapy & Biopsychosocial Hlth, Krems An Der Donau, Austria
关键词
Depression; Psychotherapy; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Childhood Emotional Abuse; Observational Study; NONSPECIFIC PSYCHOTHERAPY; GERMAN VERSION; MALTREATMENT; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jad.2021.12.087
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) and Metacognitive Therapy (MCT) are effective for depression. CBASP might offer most benefit in patients reporting childhood emotional abuse (CEA). This needs to be confirmed in real-world settings and in comparisons with depression-specific psychotherapies. This study examines the moderating influence of CEA on the effectiveness of CBASP versus MCT. Methods In this observational study, we recruited patients treated with either CBASP or MCT in an intensive day treatment program for depression. CEA was assessed using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ). Patients reported symptoms weekly using the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms (QIDS-SR). Mixed model analysis was run on the Intention to Treat dataset (ITT) using propensity matching to overcome baseline imbalances. Results A total of 141 patients were included in the analysis (MCT n = 78, CBASP n = 63). CEA moderated the treatment effect (time x CEA x treatment: beta = 0.03, SE = 0.01, p = 0.014). Post-hoc analyses revealed that CBASP was more effective than MCT in patients without CEA (time x treatment: beta = -0.01, SE = 0.007, p = .045). The difference between CBASP and MCT was not statistically significant for patients with CEA (beta = 0.015, SE = 0.008, p = .11). Limitations Because of non-random treatment allocation the differences between CBASP and MCT can be due to unobserved baseline imbalances. Conclusions Our findings suggest that in patients reporting CEA, CBASP might not offer additional benefits above other depression-specific psychotherapies. Public Health Significance Statements This study shows that, on average, individuals with depression benefit equally from CBASP and MCT under the conditions of routine practice. Yet, CBASP was more effective than MCT for those without childhood emotional abuse. If childhood emotional abuse was present, CBASP and MCT were equally effective.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 75
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy of internet-based cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression in adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu, Yanan
    Fenfen, E.
    Wang, Yan
    Xu, Meng
    Liu, Simin
    Zhou, Liying
    Song, Guihang
    Shang, Xue
    Yang, Chaoqun
    Yang, Kehu
    Li, Xiuxia
    INTERNET INTERVENTIONS-THE APPLICATION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN MENTAL AND BEHAVIOURAL HEALTH, 2023, 34
  • [42] Addressing depression in older adults with Alzheimer's through cognitive behavioral therapy: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gonzalez-Martin, Ana Maria
    Aibar Almazan, Agustin
    Rivas Campo, Yulieth
    Rodriguez Sobrino, Noelia
    Castellote Caballero, Yolanda
    FRONTIERS IN AGING NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 15
  • [43] The Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression Among Individuals with Diabetes: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Qiuling An
    Zhan Yu
    Fei Sun
    Jiaxuan Chen
    Anao Zhang
    Current Diabetes Reports, 2023, 23 : 245 - 252
  • [44] Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression Among Chinese Diabetes Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yu, Zhan
    An, Qiuling
    Hawkins, Jaclynn
    Zhang, Anao
    RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2024, 34 (03) : 277 - 292
  • [45] The Clinical Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Patients with Insomnia and Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Feng, Guiyu
    Han, Mei
    Li, Xun
    Geng, Le
    Miao, Yingchun
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 2020
  • [46] Computerized Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Treatment of Depression and Anxiety in Adolescents: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Wickersham, Alice
    Barack, Tamara
    Cross, Lauren
    Downs, Johnny
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (04)
  • [47] Reducing relapse and recurrence in unipolar depression: A comparative meta-analysis of cognitive-behavioral therapy's effects
    Vittengl, Jeffrey R.
    Clark, Lee Anna
    Dunn, Todd W.
    Jarrett, Robin B.
    JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 75 (03) : 475 - 488
  • [48] The Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression Among Individuals with Diabetes: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    An, Qiuling
    Yu, Zhan
    Sun, Fei
    Chen, Jiaxuan
    Zhang, Anao
    CURRENT DIABETES REPORTS, 2023, 23 (09) : 245 - 252
  • [49] Two-Year Follow-Up after Treatment with the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy versus Supportive Psychotherapy for Early-Onset Chronic Depression
    Schramm, Elisabeth
    Kriston, Levente
    Elsaesser, Moritz
    Fangmeier, Thomas
    Meister, Ramona
    Bausch, Paul
    Zobel, Ingo
    Bailer, Josef
    Wambach, Katrin
    Backenstrass, Matthias
    Klein, JanPhilipp
    Schoepf, Dieter
    Schnell, Knut
    Gumz, Antje
    Loewe, Bernd
    Walter, Henrik
    Wolf, Markus
    Domschke, Katharina
    Berger, Mathias
    Hautzinger, Martin
    Haerter, Martin
    PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2019, 88 (03) : 154 - 164
  • [50] Effect of Sleep Disturbance Symptoms on Treatment Outcome in Blended Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression (E-COMPARED Study): Secondary Analysis
    Jensen, Esben Skov
    Ladegaard, Nicolai
    Mellentin, Angelina Isabella
    Ebert, David Daniel
    Titzler, Ingrid
    Araya, Ricardo
    Pashoja, Arlinda Cerga
    Haw, Jean-Baptiste
    Holtzmann, Jerome
    Cieslak, Roman
    Smoktunowicz, Ewelina
    Banos, Rosa
    Herrero, Rocio
    Garcia-Palacios, Azucena
    Botella, Cristina
    Berger, Thomas
    Krieger, Tobias
    Holmberg, Trine Theresa
    Topooco, Naira
    Andersson, Gerhard
    van Straten, Annemieke
    Kemmeren, Lise
    Kleiboer, Annet
    Riper, Heleen
    Mathiasen, Kim
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (03)