Does childhood emotional abuse moderate the effect of cognitive behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy versus meta-cognitive therapy in depression? A propensity score analysis on an observational study

被引:5
|
作者
Klein, Jan Philipp [1 ]
Dale, Rachel [2 ]
Glanert, Sarah [1 ]
Grave, Ulrike [1 ]
Surig, Svenja [1 ]
Zurowski, Bartosz [1 ]
Borgwardt, Stefan [1 ]
Schweiger, Ulrich [1 ]
Fassbinder, Eva [1 ]
Probst, Thomas [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lubeck, Dept Psychiat Psychosomat & Psychotherapy, Translat Psychiat Unit, D-23538 Lubeck, Germany
[2] Danube Univ Krems, Dept Psychotherapy & Biopsychosocial Hlth, Krems An Der Donau, Austria
关键词
Depression; Psychotherapy; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Childhood Emotional Abuse; Observational Study; NONSPECIFIC PSYCHOTHERAPY; GERMAN VERSION; MALTREATMENT; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jad.2021.12.087
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) and Metacognitive Therapy (MCT) are effective for depression. CBASP might offer most benefit in patients reporting childhood emotional abuse (CEA). This needs to be confirmed in real-world settings and in comparisons with depression-specific psychotherapies. This study examines the moderating influence of CEA on the effectiveness of CBASP versus MCT. Methods In this observational study, we recruited patients treated with either CBASP or MCT in an intensive day treatment program for depression. CEA was assessed using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ). Patients reported symptoms weekly using the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms (QIDS-SR). Mixed model analysis was run on the Intention to Treat dataset (ITT) using propensity matching to overcome baseline imbalances. Results A total of 141 patients were included in the analysis (MCT n = 78, CBASP n = 63). CEA moderated the treatment effect (time x CEA x treatment: beta = 0.03, SE = 0.01, p = 0.014). Post-hoc analyses revealed that CBASP was more effective than MCT in patients without CEA (time x treatment: beta = -0.01, SE = 0.007, p = .045). The difference between CBASP and MCT was not statistically significant for patients with CEA (beta = 0.015, SE = 0.008, p = .11). Limitations Because of non-random treatment allocation the differences between CBASP and MCT can be due to unobserved baseline imbalances. Conclusions Our findings suggest that in patients reporting CEA, CBASP might not offer additional benefits above other depression-specific psychotherapies. Public Health Significance Statements This study shows that, on average, individuals with depression benefit equally from CBASP and MCT under the conditions of routine practice. Yet, CBASP was more effective than MCT for those without childhood emotional abuse. If childhood emotional abuse was present, CBASP and MCT were equally effective.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 75
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression and Anxiety in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Reavell, James
    Hopkinson, Michael
    Clarkesmith, Danielle
    Lane, Deirdre A.
    PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 2018, 80 (08): : 742 - 753
  • [32] Pilot Study Dismantling the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy: Identifying the Active Ingredients
    Long, Lee R.
    Foster, Mark
    Burr, Kara
    Penberthy, J. Kim
    Baker, Tracy N.
    McCullough Jr, James P.
    COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH, 2024, 48 (04) : 757 - 765
  • [33] A systematic review and meta-analysis of cognitive behavioral and psychodynamic therapy for depression in Parkinson's disease patients
    Xie, Cheng-Long
    Wang, Xiao-Dan
    Chen, Jie
    Lin, Hua-Zhen
    Chen, Yi-He
    Pan, Jia-Lin
    Wang, Wen-Wen
    NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 36 (06) : 833 - 843
  • [34] A systematic review and meta-analysis of cognitive behavioral and psychodynamic therapy for depression in Parkinson’s disease patients
    Cheng-Long Xie
    Xiao-Dan Wang
    Jie Chen
    Hua-Zhen Lin
    Yi-He Chen
    Jia-Lin Pan
    Wen-Wen Wang
    Neurological Sciences, 2015, 36 : 833 - 843
  • [35] The Effects of Online Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Postpartum Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Pan, Jingyu
    Luo, Wenjing
    Zhang, Haijuan
    Wang, Yong
    Lu, Hong
    Wang, Chongkun
    Li, Chunying
    Fu, Li
    Hu, Yinchu
    Li, Yuxuan
    Shen, Meidi
    HEALTHCARE, 2025, 13 (07)
  • [36] Cognitive behavioral therapy for treatment-resistant depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Jia-Mei
    Zhang, Yi
    Su, Wen-Jun
    Liu, Lin-Lin
    Gong, Hong
    Peng, Wei
    Jiang, Chun-Lei
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2018, 268 : 243 - 250
  • [37] Does Gender Moderate the Effect of Virtual Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Interventions on Depressive Symptoms in Rural Cardiac Patients? Preliminary Analysis of the Combat Study
    Thompson, Jessica H.
    Chung, Misook L.
    Feltner, Frances J.
    Martin, Gia Mudd
    Biddle, Martha J.
    Miller, Jennifer
    Rayens, Mary Kay
    Lennie, Terry
    Wu, Jia Rong
    Okoli, Chizimuzo
    Fisher, Mary Beth
    Moser, Debra K.
    CIRCULATION, 2023, 148
  • [38] Evaluation of the effect of cognitive behavioral therapy on tocophobia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Najafi, Tahereh Fathi
    Dashti, Sareh
    Bolghanabadi, Nasibeh
    Rezvanifard, Malihe
    Andaroon, Nafise
    Abadibavil, Dina
    Golkhatmy, Fahimeh Tahoonian
    Bahri, Narjes
    ARCHIVES OF PSYCHIATRIC NURSING, 2021, 35 (03) : 255 - 260
  • [39] The effectiveness of technology-based cognitive behavioral therapy on perinatal depression and anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ching, Hannie
    Chua, Joelle Yan Xin
    Chua, Jing Shi
    Shorey, Shefaly
    WORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING, 2023, 20 (05) : 451 - 464
  • [40] The Impact of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Peripheral Interleukin-6 Levels in Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ma, Haijing
    Xu, Jiatong
    Li, Ruonan
    McIntyre, Roger S.
    Teopiz, Kayla M.
    Cao, Bing
    Yang, Fahui
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 13