Does childhood emotional abuse moderate the effect of cognitive behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy versus meta-cognitive therapy in depression? A propensity score analysis on an observational study

被引:5
|
作者
Klein, Jan Philipp [1 ]
Dale, Rachel [2 ]
Glanert, Sarah [1 ]
Grave, Ulrike [1 ]
Surig, Svenja [1 ]
Zurowski, Bartosz [1 ]
Borgwardt, Stefan [1 ]
Schweiger, Ulrich [1 ]
Fassbinder, Eva [1 ]
Probst, Thomas [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lubeck, Dept Psychiat Psychosomat & Psychotherapy, Translat Psychiat Unit, D-23538 Lubeck, Germany
[2] Danube Univ Krems, Dept Psychotherapy & Biopsychosocial Hlth, Krems An Der Donau, Austria
关键词
Depression; Psychotherapy; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Childhood Emotional Abuse; Observational Study; NONSPECIFIC PSYCHOTHERAPY; GERMAN VERSION; MALTREATMENT; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jad.2021.12.087
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) and Metacognitive Therapy (MCT) are effective for depression. CBASP might offer most benefit in patients reporting childhood emotional abuse (CEA). This needs to be confirmed in real-world settings and in comparisons with depression-specific psychotherapies. This study examines the moderating influence of CEA on the effectiveness of CBASP versus MCT. Methods In this observational study, we recruited patients treated with either CBASP or MCT in an intensive day treatment program for depression. CEA was assessed using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ). Patients reported symptoms weekly using the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms (QIDS-SR). Mixed model analysis was run on the Intention to Treat dataset (ITT) using propensity matching to overcome baseline imbalances. Results A total of 141 patients were included in the analysis (MCT n = 78, CBASP n = 63). CEA moderated the treatment effect (time x CEA x treatment: beta = 0.03, SE = 0.01, p = 0.014). Post-hoc analyses revealed that CBASP was more effective than MCT in patients without CEA (time x treatment: beta = -0.01, SE = 0.007, p = .045). The difference between CBASP and MCT was not statistically significant for patients with CEA (beta = 0.015, SE = 0.008, p = .11). Limitations Because of non-random treatment allocation the differences between CBASP and MCT can be due to unobserved baseline imbalances. Conclusions Our findings suggest that in patients reporting CEA, CBASP might not offer additional benefits above other depression-specific psychotherapies. Public Health Significance Statements This study shows that, on average, individuals with depression benefit equally from CBASP and MCT under the conditions of routine practice. Yet, CBASP was more effective than MCT for those without childhood emotional abuse. If childhood emotional abuse was present, CBASP and MCT were equally effective.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 75
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Versus Interpersonal Psychotherapy in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Zhou She-Gang
    Hou Yan-Fei
    Liu Ding
    Zhang Xiao-Yuan
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2017, 130 (23) : 2844 - 2851
  • [22] Treatment of chronic major depression using the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP)
    Jehle P.J.
    McCullough Jr. J.P.
    Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 2002, 32 (4) : 263 - 271
  • [23] Efficacy and Acceptability of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Yang, Lining
    Zhou, Xinyu
    Zhou, Chanjuan
    Zhang, Yuqing
    Pu, Juncai
    Liu, Lanxiang
    Gong, Xue
    Xie, Peng
    ACADEMIC PEDIATRICS, 2017, 17 (01) : 9 - 16
  • [24] Potential mechanisms of change in cognitive behavioral therapy for childhood anxiety: A meta-analysis
    Luo, Aileen
    McAloon, John
    DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, 2021, 38 (02) : 220 - 232
  • [25] Cognitive behavioral therapy for depression and anxiety of Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Qi
    Yang, Xia
    Song, Huimin
    Jin, Yi
    COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 39
  • [26] Effects of cognitive behavioral therapy on people living with HIV and depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shi, Ying
    Zhao, Minghui
    Chen, Si
    Wang, Shouqi
    Li, Huanhuan
    Ying, Jie
    Zhang, Meiling
    Li, Yuan
    Xing, Zhuangjie
    Sun, Jiao
    PSYCHOLOGY HEALTH & MEDICINE, 2019, 24 (05) : 578 - 594
  • [27] Cognitive-behavioral therapy of depression and depressive symptoms during adolescence: A review and meta-analysis
    Reinecke, MA
    Ryan, NE
    DuBois, DL
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 1998, 37 (01) : 26 - 34
  • [28] Impaired empathic functioning in chronic depression: Behavioral evidence for the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) model
    Guhn, Anne
    Merkel, Lydia
    Heim, Christine
    Klawitter, Heiko
    Teich, Paula
    Betzler, Felix
    Sterzer, Philipp
    Koehler, Stephan
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2022, 152 : 79 - 85
  • [29] A Meta-analysis of the Effectiveness of Behavioral Intervention Technologies and Face-to-Face Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Youth with Depression
    Higinbotham M.K.
    Emmert-Aronson B.
    Bunge E.L.
    Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 2020, 5 (4) : 324 - 335
  • [30] A meta-(re)analysis of the effects of cognitive therapy versus 'other therapies' for depression
    Wampold, BE
    Minami, T
    Baskin, TW
    Tierney, SC
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2002, 68 (2-3) : 159 - 165