Does childhood emotional abuse moderate the effect of cognitive behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy versus meta-cognitive therapy in depression? A propensity score analysis on an observational study

被引:5
|
作者
Klein, Jan Philipp [1 ]
Dale, Rachel [2 ]
Glanert, Sarah [1 ]
Grave, Ulrike [1 ]
Surig, Svenja [1 ]
Zurowski, Bartosz [1 ]
Borgwardt, Stefan [1 ]
Schweiger, Ulrich [1 ]
Fassbinder, Eva [1 ]
Probst, Thomas [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lubeck, Dept Psychiat Psychosomat & Psychotherapy, Translat Psychiat Unit, D-23538 Lubeck, Germany
[2] Danube Univ Krems, Dept Psychotherapy & Biopsychosocial Hlth, Krems An Der Donau, Austria
关键词
Depression; Psychotherapy; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Childhood Emotional Abuse; Observational Study; NONSPECIFIC PSYCHOTHERAPY; GERMAN VERSION; MALTREATMENT; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jad.2021.12.087
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) and Metacognitive Therapy (MCT) are effective for depression. CBASP might offer most benefit in patients reporting childhood emotional abuse (CEA). This needs to be confirmed in real-world settings and in comparisons with depression-specific psychotherapies. This study examines the moderating influence of CEA on the effectiveness of CBASP versus MCT. Methods In this observational study, we recruited patients treated with either CBASP or MCT in an intensive day treatment program for depression. CEA was assessed using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ). Patients reported symptoms weekly using the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms (QIDS-SR). Mixed model analysis was run on the Intention to Treat dataset (ITT) using propensity matching to overcome baseline imbalances. Results A total of 141 patients were included in the analysis (MCT n = 78, CBASP n = 63). CEA moderated the treatment effect (time x CEA x treatment: beta = 0.03, SE = 0.01, p = 0.014). Post-hoc analyses revealed that CBASP was more effective than MCT in patients without CEA (time x treatment: beta = -0.01, SE = 0.007, p = .045). The difference between CBASP and MCT was not statistically significant for patients with CEA (beta = 0.015, SE = 0.008, p = .11). Limitations Because of non-random treatment allocation the differences between CBASP and MCT can be due to unobserved baseline imbalances. Conclusions Our findings suggest that in patients reporting CEA, CBASP might not offer additional benefits above other depression-specific psychotherapies. Public Health Significance Statements This study shows that, on average, individuals with depression benefit equally from CBASP and MCT under the conditions of routine practice. Yet, CBASP was more effective than MCT for those without childhood emotional abuse. If childhood emotional abuse was present, CBASP and MCT were equally effective.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 75
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Propensity Score Analysis of Homework Adherence-Outcome Relations in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression
    Callan, Judith A.
    Kazantzis, Nikolaos
    Park, Seo Young
    Moore, Charity G.
    Thase, Michael E.
    Minhajuddin, Abu
    Kornblith, Sander
    Siegle, Greg J.
    BEHAVIOR THERAPY, 2019, 50 (02) : 285 - 299
  • [2] Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy versus Escitalopram in Chronic Major Depression
    Schramm, Elisabeth
    Zobel, Ingo
    Schoepf, Dieter
    Fangmeier, Thomas
    Schnell, Knut
    Walter, Henrik
    Drost, Sarah
    Schmidt, Paul
    Brakemeier, Eva-Lotta
    Berger, Mathias
    Normann, Claus
    PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2015, 84 (04) : 227 - 240
  • [3] Treatment for chronic depression using Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP)
    McCullough, JP
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 59 (08) : 833 - 846
  • [4] Cognitive Restructuring, Behavioral Activation and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in the Treatment of Adult Depression: A Network Meta-Analysis
    Ciharova, Marketa
    Furukawa, Toshi A.
    Efthimiou, Orestis
    Karyotaki, Eirini
    Miguel, Clara
    Noma, Hisashi
    Cipriani, Andrea
    Riper, Heleen
    Cuijpers, Pim
    JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 89 (06) : 563 - 574
  • [5] Cognitive behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy versus antidepressants: A systematic review
    Arkaç M.
    Elsheikh M.
    Jähne A.
    Zeitschrift für Allgemeinmedizin, 2017, 93 (1): : 17 - 23
  • [6] Does cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders improve threat reappraisal?: A meta-analysis
    Draheim, Amanda A.
    Anderson, Page L.
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND COGNITIVE THERAPY, 2021, 31 (02) : 125 - 135
  • [7] Change in Interpersonal and Metacognitive Skills During Treatment With Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy and Metacognitive Therapy: Results From an Observational Study
    Suerig, Svenja
    Ohm, Katharina
    Grave, Ulrike
    Glanert, Sarah
    Herzog, Philipp
    Fassbinder, Eva
    Borgwardt, Stefan
    Klein, Jan Philipp
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 12
  • [8] A meta-analysis of group Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) interventions for adolescents with depression
    Keles, Serap
    Idsoe, Thormod
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENCE, 2018, 67 : 129 - 139
  • [9] The influence of cognitive-behavioral therapy on depression in dialysis patients meta-analysis
    Zegarow, Pawel
    Manczak, Malgorzata
    Rysz, Jacek
    Olszewski, Robert
    ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 16 (06) : 1271 - 1278
  • [10] Can Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety and Depression Be Improved with Pharmacotherapy? A Meta-analysis
    Tolin, David F.
    PSYCHIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2017, 40 (04) : 715 - 738