Efficient Sampling of PI Controllers in Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization

被引:1
作者
Reynoso-Meza, Gilberto [1 ]
Santos Coelho, Leandro D. [1 ]
Freire, Roberto Z. [1 ]
机构
[1] Pontifical Univ Catolica Parana PUCPR, Ind & Syst Engn Grad Program PPGEPS, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
来源
GECCO'15: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE | 2015年
关键词
Multivariable PI controllers; evolutionary algorithms; DECISION-MAKING; CURRENT TRENDS; DESIGN; ALGORITHMS;
D O I
10.1145/2739480.2754807
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Proportional-Integral (PI) controllers remain as a practical and reliable solution for multivariable control for several industrial applications. Efforts to develop new tuning techniques fulfilling several performance indicators and guaranteeing robustness are worthwhile. Evolutionary multiobjective optimization (EMO) has been used for multivariable PI controller tuning, due to their flexibility and its advantages to depict the trade off among conflicting objectives. It is a regular practice bounding the search space as a hyperbox; nevertheless, the shape of the feasible space of PI parameters which are internally stable for a given control loop is irregular. Therefore, such hyperbox could enclose feasible and unfeasible solutions or contain a subset of the feasible set. In the former case, convergence capabilities of an algorithm could be compromised; in the latter case, search space is not fully explored. In this work, a coding mechanism is proposed in order to explore more efficiently the PI parameters feasible set (that is, all feasible solutions and only feasible solutions) in EMO. With the example provided, the advantages to approximate a Pareto front for 2, 3 and 5 objectives are shown, validating the mechanism as useful for EMO in multivariable PI controller tuning.
引用
收藏
页码:1263 / 1270
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Review of Evolutionary Multimodal Multiobjective Optimization
    Tanabe, Ryoji
    Ishibuchi, Hisao
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2020, 24 (01) : 193 - 200
  • [22] Multiobjective design optimization by an evolutionary algorithm
    Ray, T
    Tai, K
    Seow, KC
    ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2001, 33 (04) : 399 - 424
  • [23] Multiobjective Data Mining from Solutions by Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization
    Nojima, Yusuke
    Tanigaki, Yuki
    Ishibuchi, Hisao
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE (GECCO'17), 2017, : 617 - 624
  • [24] Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms for multivariable PI controller design
    Reynoso-Meza, Gilberto
    Sanchis, Javier
    Blasco, Xavier
    Herrero, Juan M.
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (09) : 7895 - 7907
  • [25] Tuning of PI Controllers for Electric Drives using Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithm
    dos Santos, Guilherme F.
    da Silva, Wander G.
    da Cruz Junior, Gelson
    2022 IEEE LATIN AMERICAN CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (LA-CCI), 2022, : 65 - 70
  • [26] An Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization Approach for HEV Energy Management System
    Pajares Ferrando, Alberto
    Blasco Ferragud, Xavier
    Reynoso-Meza, Gilberto
    Herrero Dura, Juan Manuel
    CONTROLO'2014 - PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH PORTUGUESE CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2015, 321 : 345 - 354
  • [27] On the Effectiveness of Sampling for Evolutionary Optimization in Noisy Environments
    Qian, Chao
    Yu, Yang
    Tang, Ke
    Jin, Yaochu
    Yao, Xin
    Zhou, Zhi-Hua
    EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2018, 26 (02) : 237 - 267
  • [28] A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for approximating the efficient set
    Hanne, Thomas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 176 (03) : 1723 - 1734
  • [29] Bayesian Inverse Transfer in Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization
    Liu, Jiao
    Gupta, Abhishek
    Ong, Yew-Soon
    ACM Transactions on Evolutionary Learning and Optimization, 2024, 4 (04):
  • [30] Evolutionary multiobjective optimization in noisy problem environments
    Hamidreza Eskandari
    Christopher D. Geiger
    Journal of Heuristics, 2009, 15 : 559 - 595