68Ga-PSMA PET/CT Detects the Location and Extent of Primary Prostate Cancer

被引:152
|
作者
Fendler, Wolfgang P. [1 ]
Schmidt, Dorothea F. [1 ]
Wenter, Vera [1 ]
Thierfelder, Kolja M. [2 ]
Zach, Christian [1 ]
Stief, Christian [3 ,4 ]
Bartenstein, Peter [1 ]
Kirchner, Thomas [5 ]
Gildehaus, Franz J. [1 ]
Gratzke, Christian [3 ,4 ]
Faber, Claudius [5 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Dept Nucl Med, Marchioninistr 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[2] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Inst Clin Radiol, Munich, Germany
[3] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Dept Urol, Munich, Germany
[4] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Comprehens Canc Ctr, Munich, Germany
[5] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Inst Pathol, Munich, Germany
关键词
biopsy; PET; prostate cancer; PSMA; GA-68-LABELED PSMA LIGAND; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; MEMBRANE ANTIGEN; BIOPSY; FUSION;
D O I
10.2967/jnumed.116.172627
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
We evaluated the accuracy of PET/CT with Ga-68-PSMA-HBED-CC-a Ga-68-conjugated ligand of human prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) to localize cancer in the prostate and surrounding tissue at initial diagnosis. Methods: Twenty-one patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer underwent Ga-68-PSMA-HBED-CC (Ga-68-PSMA) PET/CT at a median of 4 d (range, 0-47 d) before radical prostatectorriy. Based on a 6-segment model, the Gleason score and proportion of tumor tissue within each segment (segmental tumor burden, or STB) as determined by histopathology (STBHP) were correlated with SUVmax and STB as determined by different SUV cutoffs for Ga-68-PSMA PET (STBPET1-6). Furthermore, the involvement of seminal vesicles and other extracapsular extension were assessed by histopathology and PET/CT. Results: Histopathology-positive segments (n = 100 of 126; 79%) demonstrated a significantly higher mean +/- SD SUVmax (11.8 +/- 7.6) than histopathology-negative segments (4.9 +/- 2.9; P < 0.001). Receiver-operating-characteristic analysis revealed an optimal SUVmax cutoff of 6.5 for discrimination of histopathology-positive segments from histopathology-negative segments (area under the curve, 0.84; P < 0.001), which gave 67% sensitivity, 92% specificity, a 97% positive predictive value, a 42% negative predictive value, and 72% accuracy. STBPET3 as determined by (2 x blood SUV) + (2 x SD) correlated best with STBHP (Pearson rho = 0.68; P < 0.001; mean difference +/- SD, 19% 15%). PET/CT correctly detected invasion of seminal vesicles (n = 11 of 21 patients; 52%) with 86% accuracy and tumor spread through the capsule (n = 12; 57%) with 71% accuracy. Conclusion: Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT accurately detected the location and extent of primary prostate cancer. Our preliminary findings warrant further investigation of Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT in conjunction with needle biopsy.
引用
收藏
页码:1720 / 1725
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Metastases From Colorectal Cancer Avid on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT
    Hangaard, Lise
    Jochumsen, Mads Ryo
    Vendelbo, Mikkel Holm
    Bouchelouche, Kirsten
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2017, 42 (07) : 532 - 533
  • [42] 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for the evaluation of metastasis in patients with prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhou, Jing
    Wu, Renhui
    Wang, Wenrong
    Zhao, Yigang
    Liu, Xiaohua
    HELLENIC JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2022, 25 (03) : 297 - 311
  • [43] 68Ga-DOTATOC and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT Unmasked a Case of Prostate Cancer With Neuroendocrine Differentiation
    Chen, Sirong
    Cheung, Shing Kee
    Wong, Ka-nin
    Wong, Kwok Kee
    Ho, Chi-lai
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 41 (12) : 959 - 960
  • [44] Correlation of Intraprostatic Tumor Extent with 68Ga-PSMA Distribution in Patients with Prostate Cancer
    Rahbar, Kambiz
    Weckesser, Matthias
    Huss, Sebastian
    Semjonow, Axel
    Breyholz, Hans-Joerg
    Schrader, Andres J.
    Schaefers, Michael
    Boegemann, Martin
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 57 (04) : 563 - 567
  • [45] 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and PET/MRI in high-risk prostate cancer patients
    Sanli, Yasemin
    Sanli, Oner
    Simsek, Duygu Has
    Subramaniam, Rathan M.
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 39 (10) : 871 - 880
  • [46] Synchronous Paraganglioma Masquerading as 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT-Avid Metastasis in Carcinoma Prostate-How Specific Is 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT?
    Tyagi, Shantanu
    Singh, Shrawan Kumar
    Narain, Tushar Aditya
    Singh, Harmandeep
    Kumar, Rajender
    Vadi, Shelvin Kumar
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2019, 44 (06) : E420 - E422
  • [47] PET/MRI with a 68Ga-PSMA ligand for the detection of prostate cancer
    Ali Afshar-Oromieh
    Uwe Haberkorn
    Boris Hadaschik
    Gregor Habl
    Matthias Eder
    Michael Eisenhut
    Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
    Matthias C. Roethke
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2013, 40 : 1629 - 1630
  • [48] 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT: Joint EANM and SNMMI procedure guideline for prostate cancer imaging: version 1.0
    Wolfgang P. Fendler
    Matthias Eiber
    Mohsen Beheshti
    Jamshed Bomanji
    Francesco Ceci
    Steven Cho
    Frederik Giesel
    Uwe Haberkorn
    Thomas A. Hope
    Klaus Kopka
    Bernd J. Krause
    Felix M. Mottaghy
    Heiko Schöder
    John Sunderland
    Simon Wan
    Hans-Jürgen Wester
    Stefano Fanti
    Ken Herrmann
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2017, 44 : 1014 - 1024
  • [49] 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT: Joint EANM and SNMMI procedure guideline for prostate cancer imaging: version 1.0
    Fendler, Wolfgang P.
    Eiber, Matthias
    Beheshti, Mohsen
    Bomanji, Jamshed
    Ceci, Francesco
    Cho, Steven
    Giesel, Frederik
    Haberkorn, Uwe
    Hope, Thomas A.
    Kopka, Klaus
    Krause, Bernd J.
    Mottaghy, Felix M.
    Schoder, Heiko
    Sunderland, John
    Wan, Simon
    Wester, Hans-Juergen
    Fanti, Stefano
    Herrmann, Ken
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2017, 44 (06) : 1014 - 1024
  • [50] Evaluation of whole-body tumor burden with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in the biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer
    Brito, A. E. T.
    Mourato, F. A.
    de Oliveira, R. P. M.
    Leal, A. L. G.
    Filho, P. J. A.
    de Filho, J. L. L.
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2019, 33 (05) : 344 - 350