共 50 条
Retrospective observational study of the management of multiple sclerosis patients with resistant spasticity in Spain: the '5E' study
被引:0
|作者:
Arroyo, Rafael
[1
]
Vila, Carlos
[2
]
Clissold, Steve
[3
]
机构:
[1] Hosp Clin San Carlos, Neurol Serv, Madrid, Spain
[2] Almirall, Global Med Affairs, Barcelona 08021, Spain
[3] Content Ed Net, Madrid 28036, Spain
关键词:
healthcare costs;
multiple sclerosis;
Spain;
spasticity;
MODIFIED ASHWORTH SCALE;
NUMERIC RATING-SCALE;
CLINICAL IMPORTANCE;
DOUBLE-BLIND;
RELIABILITY;
INTERRATER;
DISABILITY;
VALIDITY;
BURDEN;
COSTS;
D O I:
10.1586/ERP.11.6
中图分类号:
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background: Multiple sclerosis spasticity (MSS) is a common and disabling symptom for which a number of antispastic agents are available; however, evidence-based guidelines for optimal management are lacking. Objective: This retrospective observational assessment investigated the current management approach for resistant MSS in Spain. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the evolution of MSS and to estimate the social and health-related costs of managing MSS in the Spanish healthcare system. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed using case records from 212 MS patients with spasticity that were resistant to >= 1 previous therapy. Data were collected over 1-3 years (mean 2.1 years), including: sociodemographics, medical history, clinical scores and all therapy/other resources consumed (e.g., rehabilitation and carers' time). Disease progression was estimated from the evolution of recorded clinical scales, and an analysis of costs from a Spanish healthcare and social perspective was performed. Results: The majority of patients were female and most had secondary progressive MS. Baclofen (76-80%), tizanidine and benzodiazepines were the most common antispastic drugs administered. A variety of spasticity rating scales were employed, and they demonstrated the same general trends. MS progressed, with the composite score for spasticity and mobility deteriorating in 46.4% of patients, and there were no marked differences between antispasticity drugs. The annual healthcare-related cost of treating an MSS resistant patient in the Spanish healthcare system was (sic)15,405, largely attributable to the cost of disease-modifying drugs and care provision. Other aspects, such as medical visits and antispastic treatments, formed only a small portion of cost. Conclusions: MSS progresses despite treatment with currently available antispastic agents, and it is associated with a high level of disability. Spasticity treatment represents a minor element of the overall cost of managing MSS patients in Spain. The approach to the assessment of spasticity varies between centers.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 213
页数:9
相关论文