Local thickness measurement through scattering contrast and electron energy-loss spectroscopy

被引:63
作者
Zhang, Huai-Ruo [1 ]
Egerton, Ray F. [1 ,2 ]
Malac, Marek [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Nanotechnol, Edmonton, AB T6G 2M9, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Dept Phys, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G7, Canada
关键词
Mass-thickness contrast; Electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS); Inelastic mean free path (IMFP); Scattering cross section; Thickness measurement in TEM; HOLLOW CONE ILLUMINATION; SPECIMEN-THICKNESS; IMAGE CONTRAST; TRANSMISSION; FILMS; TEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.micron.2011.07.003
中图分类号
TH742 [显微镜];
学科分类号
摘要
Scattering contrast measurements were performed on thin films of amorphous carbon and polycrystalline Au, as well as single-crystal MgO nanocubes. Based on the exponential absorption law, mass-thickness can be obtained within 10% accuracy by measuring the incident and transmitted intensities in the same image. For mass-thickness measurement of a thin amorphous specimen, a small collection semiangle improves the measurement sensitivity, whereas for the measurement of polycrystalline or single-crystal specimens, a large collection semiangle should be used to reduce diffraction-contrast effects. EELS thickness measurements on MgO nanocubes suggest that the Kramers-Kronig sum-rule method (with correction for plural and surface scattering) gives 10% accuracy at medium collection semiangles but overestimates the thickness at small collection semiangles, due to underestimation of the surface-mode scattering. The log-ratio method, with a formula for inelastic mean free path proposed by Malls et al. (1988), provides 10% accuracy at small collection semiangle, while that proposed by lakoubovskii et al. (2008a) is preferable for medium and large collection semiangles. As a result of this work, we provide recommendations of preferred methods and conditions for local-thickness measurement in the TEM. Crown Copyright (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 15
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], P 33 ANN M EL MICR S
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Springer Ser. Opt. Sci.
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, MICROSC MICROANAL, DOI DOI 10.1017/S1431927610058630
[4]  
[Anonymous], Z NATURFORSCH A
[5]  
[Anonymous], P 12 EUR C EL MICR
[6]   NEW CALCULATION OF ELECTRON SCATTERING CROSS SECTIONS AND A THEORETICAL DISCUSSION OF IMAGE CONTRAST IN ELECTRON MICROSCOPE [J].
BURGE, RE ;
SMITH, GH .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE PHYSICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON, 1962, 79 (510) :673-&
[7]   VARIATION OF CONTRAST IN ELECTRON MICROSCOPE IMAGES WITH SIZE OF OBJECTIVE APERTURE [J].
COUPLAND, JH .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE PHYSICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SECTION B, 1956, 69 (06) :642-646
[8]  
Egerton R.F., 1996, ELECT ENERGY LOSS SP
[9]   MEASUREMENT OF LOCAL THICKNESS BY ELECTRON ENERGY-LOSS SPECTROSCOPY [J].
EGERTON, RF ;
CHENG, SC .
ULTRAMICROSCOPY, 1987, 21 (03) :231-244
[10]   EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF ELECTRON SCATTERING IN ELECTRON MICROSCOPE SPECIMENS [J].
HALL, CE ;
INOUE, T .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 1957, 28 (11) :1346-1348