Can Green Credit Policy Promote Firms' Green Innovation? Evidence from China

被引:40
作者
Gao, Da [1 ]
Mo, Xinlin [2 ]
Duan, Kun [2 ]
Li, Yi [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Sch Math & Stat, Hangzhou 314423, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
关键词
green credit policy; green innovation; score matching method; difference-in-difference; moderating effects; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION; INTENSITY; SUBSIDIES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/su14073911
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To achieve the twin goals of "stable growth" and "environmental protection", it is necessary to promote green innovation in firms and green transformation of the economy. This paper regards China's Green Credit Guidelines policy in 2012 as a quasi-natural experiment to explore the impact of the policy on the green innovation of heavy-polluting firms. This analysis uses Chinese A-share listed industrial enterprises from 2008-2019 as the research sample and difference-in-difference (DID) as the empirical method. The results show that implementing the green credit policy has significantly contributed to firms' green technology innovation enhancement. Moreover, the mechanism suggests that the green credit policy can promote firms' green innovation through channels, such as inhibiting the compression of heavy-polluting firms' financing space, increasing their debt financing costs, and promoting firm transformation and upgrading. Further study finds that the green credit policy promotes green innovation significantly for state-owned and large firms but not for non-state-owned and small-scale firms. Based on our empirical results, we can conclude that the green credit policy is an efficient way to realize the goal of "environmental excellence" and guide firms to effectively carry out green innovation.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Corporate governance and green innovation [J].
Amore, Mario Daniele ;
Bennedsen, Morten .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 75 :54-72
[2]   Efficacy of Command-and-Control and Market-Based Environmental Regulation in Developing Countries [J].
Blackman, Allen ;
Li, Zhengyan ;
Liu, Antung A. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF RESOURCE ECONOMICS, VOL 10, 2018, 10 :381-404
[3]   REGULATION AS A MEANS FOR THE SOCIAL-CONTROL OF TECHNOLOGY [J].
BRAUN, E ;
WIELD, D .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 1994, 6 (03) :259-272
[4]   Can direct environmental regulation promote green technology innovation in heavily polluting industries? Evidence from Chinese listed companies [J].
Cai, Xiang ;
Zhu, Bangzhu ;
Zhang, Haijing ;
Li, Liang ;
Xie, Meiying .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 746
[5]   Environmental Policy and Directed Technological Change: Evidence from the European Carbon Market [J].
Calel, Raphael ;
Dechezlepretre, Antoine .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2016, 98 (01) :173-191
[6]   Financial constraints and public funding of eco-innovation: empirical evidence from European SMEs [J].
Cecere, Grazia ;
Corrocher, Nicoletta ;
Mancusi, Maria Luisa .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2020, 54 (01) :285-302
[7]   FDI and the capital intensity of "dirty" sectors: A missing piece of the pollution haven puzzle [J].
Cole, MA ;
Elliott, RJR .
REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2005, 9 (04) :530-548
[8]   The effect of public subsidies on firms' investment-cash flow sensitivity: Transient or persistent? [J].
Colombo, Massimo G. ;
Croce, Annalisa ;
Guerini, Massimiliano .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2013, 42 (09) :1605-1623
[9]   You can't manage right what you can't measure well: Technological innovation efficiency [J].
Cruz-Cazares, Claudio ;
Bayona-Saez, Cristina ;
Garcia-Marco, Teresa .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2013, 42 (6-7) :1239-1250
[10]   Carbon Pricing Induces Innovation: Evidence from China's Regional Carbon Market Pilots [J].
Cui, Jingbo ;
Zhang, Junjie ;
Zheng, Yang .
AEA PAPERS AND PROCEEDINGS, 2018, 108 :453-457