Patient-reported outcome measures in the emergency department: a scoping review protocol

被引:1
作者
Poulsen, Ninna Rysholt [1 ,2 ]
Schougaard, Liv Marit Valen [3 ]
Sovso, Morten Breinholt [4 ]
Leutscher, Peter Derek Christian [1 ,5 ]
Pedersen, Mona Kyndi [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] North Denmark Reg Hosp, Clin Res Ctr, Hjorring, Denmark
[2] North Denmark Reg Hosp, Emergency Dept, Hjorring, Denmark
[3] Reg Hosp West Jutland, Unit Patient Reported Outcomes, AmbuFlex, Herning, Denmark
[4] Aalborg Univ, Dept Clin Med, Ctr Prehosp & Emergency Res, Aalborg, Denmark
[5] Aalborg Univ, Dept Clin Med, Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
clinical decision-making; emergency medicine; emergency service; hospital; patient-reported outcome measures;
D O I
10.11124/JBIES-20-00532
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to identify and characterize validated patient-reported outcome measures used to assess adult patients' health status in the emergency department to support clinical decision-making and to develop individual care and treatment plans. Introduction: In recent years, the workload in emergency departments has increased and patient management is characterized by a fast pace. The accelerated approach may lead to unintentional negligence by health care professionals of patient-reported signs and symptoms in the emergency department. Thus, use of patient-reported outcome measures in the emergency department may improve health care professionals' attention to the needs and health status of patients. Inclusion criteria: Studies assessing adult patients' health status in the emergency department using patient-reported outcome measures will be considered. The patient-reported outcome measures should be self-reported, assisted by a proxy, or administered through interviews. Only studies reporting on the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures will be included. Moreover, health-related information retrieved using patient-reported outcome measures should be applicable at an individual patient level. Methods: A systematic literature search will be performed primarily in the databases MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. Both published and unpublished sources of information will be considered. Studies published from 2000 onwards in Danish, Swedish, Norwegian, German, and English will be included. Using the JBI methodology for scoping reviews, two reviewers will independently perform the study selection and data extraction. The results will be presented in a tabular form together with a narrative summary.
引用
收藏
页码:3102 / 3112
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2009, Guidance for Industry Patient-Reported OutcomeMeasures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims
  • [2] Patient Impression and Satisfaction of a Self-administered, Automated Medical History-taking Device in the Emergency Department
    Arora, Sanjay
    Goldberg, Andrew D.
    Menchine, Michael
    [J]. WESTERN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2014, 15 (01) : 35 - 40
  • [3] Patient-directed intelligent an interactive computer medical history-gathering systems: A utility and feasibility study in the emergency department
    Benaroia, Mark
    Elinson, Roman
    Zarnke, Kelly
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2007, 76 (04) : 283 - 288
  • [4] Trends in diagnostic patterns and mortality in emergency ambulance service patients in 2007-2014: a population-based cohort study from the North Denmark Region
    Christensen, Erika Frischknecht
    Bendtsen, Mette Dahl
    Larsen, Thomas Mulvad
    Jensen, Flemming Bogh
    Lindskou, Tim Alex
    Holdgaard, Hans Ole
    Hansen, Poul Anders
    Johnsen, Soren Paaske
    Christiansen, Christian Fynbo
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (08):
  • [5] deVet HC, 2011, Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511996214
  • [6] The qualitative content analysis process
    Elo, Satu
    Kyngaes, Helvi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2008, 62 (01) : 107 - 115
  • [7] Fayers PM., 2007, Quality of life the assessment, analysis, and interpretation of patientreported outcomes, V2nd
  • [8] Galen L S van, 2016, Acute Med, V15, P13
  • [9] Greenhalgh J., 2017, NIHR Journals Library, V5
  • [10] The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and why?
    Greenhalgh, Joanne
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2009, 18 (01) : 115 - 123