More than spatial coordination - How Dutch agricultural collectives foster social capital for effective governance of agri-environmental measures

被引:9
作者
Barghusen, Rena [1 ]
Sattler, Claudia [1 ]
Berner, Richard [2 ]
Matzdorf, Bettina [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Governance Ecosyst Serv Working Grp, Leibniz Ctr Agr Landscape Res ZALF, Eberswalder Str 84, D-15374 Muncheberg, Germany
[2] Humboldt Univ, Master Program Integrated Nat Resource Management, Hannoversche Str 27, D-10115 Berlin, Germany
[3] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Inst Environm Planning, Herrenhauser Str 2, D-30419 Hannover, Germany
关键词
Bottom-up vs. top-down initiated; Governance of ecosystem services; Social-ecological systems; AECM; Social network analysis; Net-map tool; FARMERS; SCHEMES; CONSERVATION; MANAGEMENT; INSIGHTS; WORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.10.023
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Collective approaches for agri-environmental measures are known for aiming at spatial coordination of measures to enhance ecological effectiveness. In the Netherlands, governance networks for agri-environmental measures are centered around agricultural collectives that function as intermediaries between individual farmers and governmental as well as non-governmental actors. Against the background that some agricultural collectives are bottom-up and other top-down initiated, we analyzed in how far they can build up social capital through formal and informal relations. We used the Net-Map method to collect qualitative and quantitative data for a Social Network Analysis to uncover the network characteristics that contribute to a certain level of social capital. The results revealed that the umbrella organization links the collectives to the national governmental level and to other collectives. This is especially important for top-down initiated collectives. The facilitation of internal meetings within the collectives is important for social learning. Furthermore, a formalization of the exchange between collectives and stakeholders of nature conservation could strengthen cooperation where traditionally conflicts dominate. By analyzing interaction in detail, the social reasoning to promote collective agri-environmental measures was highlighted. They enable collaboration of different stakeholders at multiple levels to the end that knowledge and resources are bundled.
引用
收藏
页码:246 / 258
页数:13
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Area-based Initiatives-And Their Work in Bonding, Bridging and Linking Social Capital [J].
Agger, Annika ;
Jensen, Jesper Ole .
EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2015, 23 (10) :2045-2061
[2]  
Ahn T.K., 2002, 2002 ANN M AM POL SC
[3]   Motivations of farmers to participate in collective agri-environmental schemes: the case of Dutch agricultural collectives [J].
Barghusen, Rena ;
Sattler, Claudia ;
Deijl, Lisa ;
Weebers, Carleen ;
Matzdorf, Bettina .
ECOSYSTEMS AND PEOPLE, 2021, 17 (01) :539-555
[4]   What Determines Social Capital in a Social-Ecological System? Insights from a Network Perspective [J].
Barnes-Mauthe, Michele ;
Gray, Steven Allen ;
Arita, Shawn ;
Lynham, John ;
Leung, PingSun .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2015, 55 (02) :392-410
[5]   Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems [J].
Bodin, Orjan .
SCIENCE, 2017, 357 (6352) :659-+
[6]   The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? [J].
Bodin, Orjan ;
Crona, Beatrice I. .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2009, 19 (03) :366-374
[7]  
Boonstra F. G., 2021, Rapport 3066
[8]  
Borgatti S. P., 2002, Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis, DOI [10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01613.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1439-0310.2009.01613.X]
[9]  
Borgatti Stephen, 2018, ANAL SOCIAL NETWORKS, DOI DOI 10.1080/0022250X.2015.1053371
[10]  
Boulton A., 2013, Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report