Impella support for cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: A single-center experience

被引:0
|
作者
Brandao, Mariana [1 ]
Caeiro, Daniel [1 ]
Pires-Morais, Gustavo [1 ]
Almeida, Joao Goncalves [1 ]
Teixeira, Pedro Goncalves [1 ]
Silva, Marisa Passos [1 ]
Ponte, Marta [1 ]
Dias, Adelaide [1 ]
Oliveira, Marco [1 ]
Rodrigues, Alberto [1 ]
Braga, Pedro [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Vila Nova de Gaia, Cardiol Dept, Porto, Portugal
关键词
Mechanical circulatory support; Impella; Cardiogenic shock; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Coronary artery disease; MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; INTRAAORTIC BALLOON PUMP; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; DEVICE; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.repc.2020.12.012
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction and Objectives: The use of mechanical circulatory support is increasing in cases of cardiogenic shock (CS) and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HR-PCI). The Impella (R) is a percutaneous ventricular assist device that unloads the left ventricle by ejecting blood to the ascending aorta. We report our center's experience with the use of the Impella (R) device in these two clinical settings. Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective study including all consecutive patients implanted with the Impella (R) between 2007 and 2019 for CS treatment or prophylactic support of HR-PCI. Data on clinical and safety endpoints were collected and analyzed. Results: Twenty-two patients were included: 12 were treated for CS and 10 underwent an HR-PCI procedure. In the CS-treated population, the main cause of CS was acute myocardial infarction (five patients); hemolysis was the most frequent device-related complication (63.7%). In-hospital, cumulative 30-day and one-year mortality were 58.3%, 66.6% and 83.3%, respectively. In the HR-PCI group, all patients had multivessel disease (mean baseline SYNTAX I score: 44.1 +/- 13.7). In-hospital, 30-day and one-year mortality were 10.0%, 10.0% and 20.0%, respectively. There were no device- or procedure-related deaths in either group. Conclusion: The short- and long-term results of Impella (R)-supported HR-PCI were comparable to those in the literature. In the CS group, in-hospital and short-term outcomes were poor, with high mortality and non-negligible complication rates. (C) 2021 Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U.
引用
收藏
页码:853 / 861
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prolonged Impella 5.5 Support - A Single-Center Experience
    Kuznetsov, Ivan
    Kieserman, Jake
    Toubat, Omar
    Ranum, Alison
    Peterson, Adrian
    Brown, Alyson
    Biscotti, Mauer
    King, Jacob
    Cevasco, Marisa
    Bermudez, Christian
    Wald, Joyce
    CIRCULATION, 2024, 150
  • [42] Efficacy and Safety of Percutaneous Life Support During High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Refractory Cardiogenic Shock and In-Laboratory Cardiopulmonary Arrest
    Bagai, Jayant
    Webb, David
    Kasasbeh, Ehab
    Crenshaw, Marshall
    Salloum, Joseph
    Chen, Jack
    Zhao, David
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 23 (04): : 141 - 147
  • [43] Predictors of the Need for Continuous Impella Support in High Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Sharma, Saurabh
    Palacios, Igor
    O'Neill, William
    Witzke, Christian F.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 68 (18) : B50 - B50
  • [44] Clinical Predictors of Impella Dependence During High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Sanborn, Luke
    Laifman, Eric
    Huang, Christie
    Tun, Han
    Matthews, Ray
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2023, 16 (04) : S25 - S25
  • [45] An unexpected complication after impella use for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
    Roccasalva, Fausto
    Cannata, Francesco
    Chiarito, Mauro
    Pellegrino, Marta
    Pagnotta, Paolo
    Lancini, Damiano Regazzoli
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2019, 21 (0J) : J105 - J105
  • [46] A Review of Bleeding Risk with Impella-supported High-risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Vetrovec, George W.
    Kaki, Amir
    Dahle, Thom G.
    HEART INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 14 (02): : 92 - 99
  • [47] High-risk percutaneous coronary intervention in three-vessel coronary artery disease and aortic stenosis with Impella support
    Bendetti, Alice
    D'Angelo, Livio
    Masiero, Giulia
    Fraccaro, Chiara
    Pavei, Andrea
    Napodano, Massimo
    Tarantini, Giuseppe
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2020, 22 (0N) : N52 - N52
  • [48] Insertion of the Impella via the axillary artery for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
    Truong, Huu Tam D.
    Hunter, Glenn
    Lotun, Kapildeo
    Shetty, Ranjith
    Shanmugasundaram, Madhan
    Kapoor, Divya
    Thai, Hoang M.
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2018, 19 (05) : 540 - 544
  • [49] Outcomes of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support for Complex High-Risk Elective Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Single-Center Experience and Review of the Literature
    Shaukat, Arslan
    Hryniewicz-Czeneszew, Katarzyna
    Sun, Benjamin
    Mudy, Karol
    Wilson, Kelly
    Tajti, Peter
    Stanberry, Larissa
    Garberich, Ross
    Sandoval, Yader
    Burke, M. Nicholas
    Chavez, Ivan
    Gossl, Mario
    Henry, Timothy
    Lips, Daniel
    Mooney, Michael
    Poulose, Anil
    Sorajja, Paul
    Traverse, Jay
    Wang, Yale
    Bradley, Steven
    Brilakis, Emmanouil S.
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 30 (12): : 456 - 460
  • [50] Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Using Impella Devices for Decompensated Cardiogenic Shock: A Pediatric Heart Center Experience
    Parekh, Dhaval
    Jeewa, Aamir
    Tume, Sebastian C.
    Dreyer, William J.
    Pignatelli, Ricardo
    Horne, David
    Justino, Henri
    Qureshi, Athar M.
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2018, 64 (01) : 98 - 104