Impella support for cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: A single-center experience

被引:0
|
作者
Brandao, Mariana [1 ]
Caeiro, Daniel [1 ]
Pires-Morais, Gustavo [1 ]
Almeida, Joao Goncalves [1 ]
Teixeira, Pedro Goncalves [1 ]
Silva, Marisa Passos [1 ]
Ponte, Marta [1 ]
Dias, Adelaide [1 ]
Oliveira, Marco [1 ]
Rodrigues, Alberto [1 ]
Braga, Pedro [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Vila Nova de Gaia, Cardiol Dept, Porto, Portugal
关键词
Mechanical circulatory support; Impella; Cardiogenic shock; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Coronary artery disease; MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; INTRAAORTIC BALLOON PUMP; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; DEVICE; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.repc.2020.12.012
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction and Objectives: The use of mechanical circulatory support is increasing in cases of cardiogenic shock (CS) and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HR-PCI). The Impella (R) is a percutaneous ventricular assist device that unloads the left ventricle by ejecting blood to the ascending aorta. We report our center's experience with the use of the Impella (R) device in these two clinical settings. Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective study including all consecutive patients implanted with the Impella (R) between 2007 and 2019 for CS treatment or prophylactic support of HR-PCI. Data on clinical and safety endpoints were collected and analyzed. Results: Twenty-two patients were included: 12 were treated for CS and 10 underwent an HR-PCI procedure. In the CS-treated population, the main cause of CS was acute myocardial infarction (five patients); hemolysis was the most frequent device-related complication (63.7%). In-hospital, cumulative 30-day and one-year mortality were 58.3%, 66.6% and 83.3%, respectively. In the HR-PCI group, all patients had multivessel disease (mean baseline SYNTAX I score: 44.1 +/- 13.7). In-hospital, 30-day and one-year mortality were 10.0%, 10.0% and 20.0%, respectively. There were no device- or procedure-related deaths in either group. Conclusion: The short- and long-term results of Impella (R)-supported HR-PCI were comparable to those in the literature. In the CS group, in-hospital and short-term outcomes were poor, with high mortality and non-negligible complication rates. (C) 2021 Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U.
引用
收藏
页码:853 / 861
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Percutaneous cardiopulmonary support-guided coronary intervention: A single-center experience.
    Cho, J. R.
    Kim, J. S.
    Shim, C. Y.
    Moon, J. Y.
    Ko, Y. G.
    Choi, D. H.
    Jang, Y. S.
    Shim, W. H.
    Cho, S. Y.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 99 (08): : 71F - 71F
  • [32] Percutaneous coronary intervention with Impella support with and without intra-aortic balloon in cardiogenic shock patients
    Bhuiyan, Refayat
    Bimal, Tia
    Fishbein, Joanna
    Gandotra, Puneet
    Selim, Samy
    Ong, Lawrence
    Gruberg, Luis
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2023, 55 : 68 - 73
  • [33] Percutaneous Impella Recover circulatory support in high-risk coronary angioplasty
    Arieti, Mario
    Pesarini, Gabriele
    Ribichini, Flavio
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2008, 9 (04) : 269 - 274
  • [34] COMPARISON OF ECMO AND PLVAD FOR PATIENTS WITH CARDIOGENIC SHOCK UNDERGOING HIGH-RISK PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION
    Doshi, Rajkumar
    Patel, Krunalkumar
    Shah, Jay
    Jauhar, Rajiv
    Waqar, Zainulabedin
    Meraj, Perwaiz
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 71 (11) : 1006 - 1006
  • [35] High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Native Coronary Arteries Without Mechanical Circulatory Support in Acute Coronary Syndrome Without Cardiogenic Shock
    Khalid, Nauman
    Zhang, Cheng
    Shea, Corey
    Shlofmitz, Evan
    Chen, Yuefeng
    Musallam, Anees
    Case, Brian C.
    Yerasi, Charan
    Hashim, Hayder
    Rogers, Toby
    Ben-Dor, Itsik
    Bernardo, Nelson L.
    Satler, Lowell F.
    Waksman, Ron
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 158 : 37 - 44
  • [36] Utilization of the Impella for hemodynamic support during percutaneous intervention and cardiogenic shock: an insight
    Nalluri, Nikhil
    Patel, Nileshkumar
    Saouma, Samer
    Anugu, Viswajit Reddy
    Anugula, Dixitha
    Asti, Deepak
    Mehta, Varshil
    Kumar, Varun
    Atti, Varunsiri
    Edla, Sushruth
    Grewal, Rasleen K.
    Khan, Hafiz M.
    Kanotra, Ritesh
    Maniatis, Gregory
    Kandov, Ruben
    Lafferty, James C.
    Dyal, Michael
    Alfonso, Carlos E.
    Cohen, Mauricio G.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2017, 14 (10) : 789 - 804
  • [37] IMPELLA OR INTRA-AORTIC BALLOON PUMP SUPPORT IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING HIGH RISK PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION: A REAL WORLD SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE
    Sorrentino, Sabato
    Baber, Usman
    Chandrasekhar, Jaya
    Farhan, Serdar
    Faggioni, Michela
    Vogel, Birgit
    Sartori, Samantha
    Kovacic, Jason
    Moreno, Pedro
    Srinivas, Kesanakurthy
    Vijay, Pooja
    Giustino, Gennaro
    Dangas, George
    Mehran, Roxana
    Kini, Annapoorna
    Sharma, Samin
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 69 (11) : 1118 - 1118
  • [38] IMPELLA 2.5 IS SAFE AND DRASTICALLY REDUCES PROCEDURE TIMES IN HIGH-RISK PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTIONS WHEN COMPARED TO THE TANDEMHEART PTVA: SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE
    Nguyen, Huy Trong
    Karajgikar, Rucha
    Kaplish, Dheeraj
    Sharma, Samin K.
    Kini, Annapoorna S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (10)
  • [39] Avoiding Hemodynamic Collapse During High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Advanced Hemodynamics of Impella Support
    Verma, Sanjay
    Burkhoff, Daniel
    O'Neill, William W.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 89 (04) : 672 - 675
  • [40] Use of the Impella 2.5 for prophylactic circulatory support during elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
    Alasnag, Mirvat A.
    Gardi, Delair O.
    Elder, Mahir
    Kannam, Hari
    Ali, Farhan
    Petrina, Mircea
    Kheterpal, Vipin
    Hout, Mariah S.
    Schreiber, Theodore L.
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2011, 12 (05) : 299 - 303