Impella support for cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: A single-center experience

被引:0
|
作者
Brandao, Mariana [1 ]
Caeiro, Daniel [1 ]
Pires-Morais, Gustavo [1 ]
Almeida, Joao Goncalves [1 ]
Teixeira, Pedro Goncalves [1 ]
Silva, Marisa Passos [1 ]
Ponte, Marta [1 ]
Dias, Adelaide [1 ]
Oliveira, Marco [1 ]
Rodrigues, Alberto [1 ]
Braga, Pedro [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Vila Nova de Gaia, Cardiol Dept, Porto, Portugal
关键词
Mechanical circulatory support; Impella; Cardiogenic shock; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Coronary artery disease; MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; INTRAAORTIC BALLOON PUMP; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; DEVICE; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.repc.2020.12.012
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction and Objectives: The use of mechanical circulatory support is increasing in cases of cardiogenic shock (CS) and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HR-PCI). The Impella (R) is a percutaneous ventricular assist device that unloads the left ventricle by ejecting blood to the ascending aorta. We report our center's experience with the use of the Impella (R) device in these two clinical settings. Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective study including all consecutive patients implanted with the Impella (R) between 2007 and 2019 for CS treatment or prophylactic support of HR-PCI. Data on clinical and safety endpoints were collected and analyzed. Results: Twenty-two patients were included: 12 were treated for CS and 10 underwent an HR-PCI procedure. In the CS-treated population, the main cause of CS was acute myocardial infarction (five patients); hemolysis was the most frequent device-related complication (63.7%). In-hospital, cumulative 30-day and one-year mortality were 58.3%, 66.6% and 83.3%, respectively. In the HR-PCI group, all patients had multivessel disease (mean baseline SYNTAX I score: 44.1 +/- 13.7). In-hospital, 30-day and one-year mortality were 10.0%, 10.0% and 20.0%, respectively. There were no device- or procedure-related deaths in either group. Conclusion: The short- and long-term results of Impella (R)-supported HR-PCI were comparable to those in the literature. In the CS group, in-hospital and short-term outcomes were poor, with high mortality and non-negligible complication rates. (C) 2021 Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U.
引用
收藏
页码:853 / 861
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with the Tandem Heart and Impella Devices: A Single-Center Experience
    Schwartz, Bryan G.
    Ludeman, Daniel J.
    Mayeda, Guy S.
    Kloner, Robert A.
    Economides, Christina
    Burstein, Steven
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 23 (10): : 417 - 424
  • [2] Transradial percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock: A single-center experience
    Rodriguez-Leor, Oriol
    Fernandez-Nofrerias, Eduard
    Carrillo, Xavier
    Mauri, Josepa
    Oliete, Carolina
    del Carmen Rivas, Maria
    Bayes-Genis, Antoni
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 165 (03) : 280 - 285
  • [3] Secular Trend in the Use and Implementation of Impella in High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Cardiogenic Shock: A Real-World Experience
    Hritani, Abdul Wahab
    Wani, Adil S.
    Olet, Susan
    Lauterbach, Claire J.
    Allaqaband, Suhail Q.
    Bajwa, Tanvir
    Jan, M. Fuad
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 31 (09): : E265 - E270
  • [4] Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Strategies under Hemodynamic Support for Cardiogenic Shock: A Single-Center Experience with Two Patients
    Ahmed, Talha
    Chahal, Diljon
    Madathil, Ronson J.
    Kaczorowski, David
    Gupta, Anuj
    CASE REPORTS IN CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 2020
  • [5] Outcomes of Impella-supported high-risk nonemergent percutaneous coronary intervention in a large single-center registry
    Azzalini, Lorenzo
    Johal, Gurpreet S.
    Baber, Usman
    Bander, Jeffrey
    Moreno, Pedro R.
    Bazi, Lucas
    Kapur, Vishal
    Barman, Nitin
    Kini, Annapoorna S.
    Sharma, Samin K.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2021, 97 (01) : E26 - E33
  • [6] LONG-TERM OUTCOME IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING HIGH-RISK PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION WITH THE SUPPORT OF IMPELLA CP: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE
    Azzarelli, S.
    Tomasello, S.
    Franchina, A.
    Milluzzo, R.
    Scardaci, F.
    Di Giorgio, A.
    Argentino, V.
    Amico, F.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2022, 24 (SUPPL C)
  • [7] The Impella percutaneous mechanical circulatory support device in cardiogenic shock: a single-center, real-world, observational experience
    Pazzanese, V.
    Ancona, M. B.
    Bertoldi, L. F.
    Pagnesi, M.
    Marini, C.
    Gramegna, M.
    Montorfano, M.
    Chieffo, A.
    Pappalardo, F.
    Camici, P. G.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2019, 40 : 1010 - 1010
  • [8] Impella devices: a comprehensive review of their development, use, and impact on cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
    Fishkin, Tzvi
    Isath, Ameesh
    Naami, Edmund
    Aronow, Wilbert S. S.
    Levine, Avi
    Gass, Alan
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2023, 21 (09) : 613 - 620
  • [9] Timing of Impella implantation and outcomes in cardiogenic shock or high-risk percutaneous coronary revascularization
    Tarantini, Giuseppe
    Masiero, Giulia
    Burzotta, Francesco
    Pazzanese, Vittorio
    Briguori, Carlo
    Trani, Carlo
    Piva, Tommaso
    De Marco, Federico
    Di Biasi, Maurizio
    Pagnotta, Paolo
    Mojoli, Marco
    Casu, Gavino
    Giustino, Gennaro
    Lorenzoni, Giulia
    Montorfano, Matteo
    Ancona, Marco B.
    Pappalardo, Federico
    Chieffo, Alaide
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2021, 98 (02) : E222 - E234
  • [10] Single-Center Experience with the Tandem Heart Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device to Support Patients undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Al-Husami, Wael
    Yturralde, Frederick
    Mohanty, Guru
    Pastore, Christopher
    Lotun, Kapil
    Venesy, David
    Waxman, Sergio
    Pyne, Christopher
    Gossman, David
    Nesto, Richard
    Piemonte, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 20 (06): : 319 - 322