The development and validation of a multivariable prognostic model to predict foot ulceration in diabetes using a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analyses

被引:31
作者
Crawford, F. [1 ]
Cezard, G. [2 ,3 ]
Chappell, F. M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Queen Margaret Hosp, NHS Fife, Res & Dev, Dunfermline, Fife, Scotland
[2] Univ St Andrews, SGSD, PHRG, Irvine Bldg, St Andrews, Fife, Scotland
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Usher Inst Populat Hlth Sci & Informat, Ctr Populat Hlth Sci, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] Univ Edinburgh, Ctr Clin Brain Sci, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
RISK-FACTORS; PEOPLE; ULCERS; PRESSURE; IDENTIFY; WEST; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/dme.13797
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims Diabetes guidelines recommend screening for the risk of foot ulceration but vary substantially in the underlying evidence base. Our purpose was to derive and validate a prognostic model of independent risk factors for foot ulceration in diabetes using all available individual patient data from cohort studies conducted worldwide. MethodsResultsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 10 cohort studies of risk factors in the prediction of foot ulceration in diabetes. Predictors were selected for plausibility, availability and low heterogeneity. Logistic regression produced adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for foot ulceration by ulceration history, monofilament insensitivity, any absent pedal pulse, age, sex and diabetes duration. The 10 studies contained data from 16385 participants. A history of foot ulceration produced the largest OR [6.59 (95% CI 2.49 to 17.45)], insensitivity to a 10g monofilament [3.18 (95% CI 2.65 to 3.82)] and any absent pedal pulse [1.97 (95% CI 1.62 to 2.39)] were consistently, independently predictive. Combining three predictors produced sensitivities between 90.0% (95% CI 69.9% to 97.2%) and 95.3% (95% CI 84.5% to 98.7%); the corresponding specificities were between 12.1% (95% CI 8.2% to 17.3%) and 63.9% (95% CI 61.1% to 66.6%). ConclusionsWhat's new?This prognostic model of only three risk factors, a history of foot ulceration, an inability to feel a 10g monofilament and the absence of any pedal pulse, compares favourably with more complex approaches to foot risk assessment recommended in clinical diabetes guidelines. Cohort studies to identify risk factors for foot ulceration in people with diabetes have been published in the biomedical literature since the early 1990s. We assembled an international data set of risk factors collected from 16385 individuals with diabetes who took part in cohort studies to derive and validate a prognostic model of three risk factors: a history of foot ulceration, an inability to feel a 10g monofilament and at least one absent pedal pulse. The use of only these three risk factors in foot risk assessments during annual diabetes foot checks could reduce the amount of time spent assessing risk and thereby increase the number of people with diabetes who have checks performed. The frequency of risk assessment should be considered in future research.
引用
收藏
页码:1480 / 1493
页数:14
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] Preventing foot ulceration in diabetes: systematic review and meta-analyses of RCT data
    Crawford, Fay
    Nicolson, Donald J.
    Amanna, Aparna E.
    Martin, Angela
    Gupta, Saket
    Leese, Graham P.
    Heggie, Robert
    Chappell, Francesca M.
    McIntosh, Heather H.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2020, 63 (01) : 49 - 64
  • [2] A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of prognostic factors for foot ulceration in people with diabetes: the international research collaboration for the prediction of diabetic foot ulcerations (PODUS)
    Crawford, Fay
    Cezard, Genevieve
    Chappell, Francesca M.
    Murray, Gordon D.
    Price, Jacqueline F.
    Sheikh, Aziz
    Simpson, Colin R.
    Stansby, Gerard P.
    Young, Matthew J.
    HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2015, 19 (57) : 1 - +
  • [3] Using individual patient data in meta-analyses of glucose-lowering studies
    J. S. Yudkin
    B. Richter
    Diabetologia, 2010, 53 : 216 - 217
  • [4] Using individual patient data in meta-analyses of glucose-lowering studies
    Yudkin, J. S.
    Richter, B.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2010, 53 (01) : 216 - 217
  • [5] Development and validation of an incidence risk prediction model for early foot ulcer in diabetes based on a high evidence systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Dong
    Wang, Meijun
    Shang, Xin
    Liu, Xixi
    Liu, Xinbang
    Ge, Tiantian
    Ren, Qiuyue
    Ren, Xiaoxia
    Song, Xin
    Xu, Hongmei
    Sun, Mingyan
    Zhou, Hongmei
    Chang, Bai
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021, 180
  • [6] Diagnostic accuracy of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) for detecting major depression in pregnant and postnatal women: protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analyses
    Thombs, Brett D.
    Benedetti, Andrea
    Kloda, Lorie A.
    Levis, Brooke
    Riehm, Kira E.
    Azar, Marleine
    Cuijpers, Pim
    Gilbody, Simon
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    McMillan, Dean
    Patten, Scott B.
    Shrier, Ian
    Steele, Russell J.
    Ziegelstein, Roy C.
    Tonelli, Marcello
    Mitchell, Nicholas
    Comeau, Liane
    Schinazi, Joy
    Vigod, Simone
    BMJ OPEN, 2015, 5 (10):
  • [7] Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model Using Administrative Health Data to Predict Onset of Type 2 Diabetes
    Ravaut, Mathieu
    Harish, Vinyas
    Sadeghi, Hamed
    Leung, Kin Kwan
    Volkovs, Maksims
    Kornas, Kathy
    Watson, Tristan
    Poutanen, Tomi
    Rosella, Laura C.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (05) : E2111315
  • [8] Preoperative prognostic factors associated with postoperative delirium in older people undergoing surgery: protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis
    Buchan, Tayler A.
    Sadeghirad, Behnam
    Schmutz, Nayeli
    Goettel, Nicolai
    Foroutan, Farid
    Couban, Rachel
    Mbuagbaw, Lawrence
    Dodsworth, Benjamin T.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, 9 (01)