Effect of operation parameters on CO2-foam process

被引:4
作者
Asghari, K [1 ]
Khalil, F [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Regina, Fac Engn, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada
关键词
CO2-foam; CO2; flooding; mobility control; Chaser CD-1045;
D O I
10.1081/LFT-200028155
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Reducing the mobility of CO2 by means of generating in situ foam is an effective method for improving the oil recovery in CO2 flooding processes. Implementation of the CO2-foam technique typically involves the co-injection of CO2 and surfactant solution into the porous medium. The surfactant molecules form bubble films that trap the. owing CO2 molecules. The effectiveness of the CO2-foam process is measured in terms of foam mobility. The mobility of CO2-foam is affected by different operation parameters, such as pressure, temperature, foam quality, and brine concentration. However, surfactant type governs the overall efficiency of the CO2-foam process. This paper presents the results of a series of experiments conducted to study the effect of various parameters on the CO2-foam process. Bottle tests were conducted for four commercially available surfactants and among them, Chaser CD-1045 was found to be the most effective surfactant for CO2-foam flow under reservoir conditions. It was observed that an increase in pressure from 1,200 psi to 1,500 psi leads to increase of the mobility of CO2-foam, and an increase in temperature from 72 to 122 degrees F reduces the mobility. Also, as the foam quality increases from 20 to 80%, the mobility decreases. It was observed that there was no significant effect on the mobility with an increase in brine concentration from 1 to 3 wt%.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 198
页数:10
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]  
Bernard G.G., 1980, SOC PET ENG J AUG, P281
[2]   Foam Flow in Heterogeneous Porous Media: Effect of Cross Flow [J].
Bertin, H. J. ;
Apaydin, O. G. ;
Castanier, L. M. ;
Kovscek, A. R. .
SPE JOURNAL, 1999, 4 (02) :75-82
[3]  
CASTEEL JF, 1998, SPE RESERVOIR ENG, P1186
[4]   Effects of foam quality and flow rate on CO2-foam behavior at reservoir temperature and pressure [J].
Chang, SH ;
Grigg, RB .
SPE RESERVOIR EVALUATION & ENGINEERING, 1999, 2 (03) :248-254
[5]  
HELLER JP, 1984, 1984 SPE DOE ENH OIL, P16
[6]  
LEE HO, 1990, 1990 EOR S TULS APR
[7]  
YAGHOOBI H, 1998, 1998 PERM BAS OIL GA