Robust and fast nonlinear optimization of diffusion MRI microstructure models

被引:81
|
作者
Harms, R. L. [1 ,2 ]
Fritz, F. J. [1 ]
Tobisch, A. [3 ]
Goebel, R. [1 ]
Roebroeck, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Fac Psychol & Neurosci, Dept Cognit Neurosci, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Brain Innovat BV, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] German Ctr Neurodegenerat Dis DZNE, Bonn, Germany
关键词
Diffusion MRI; Microstructure; Biophysical compartment models; Nonlinear optimization; Graphics Processing Unit; Parallel computing; NEURITE ORIENTATION DISPERSION; BRAIN WHITE-MATTER; COMPARTMENT MODELS; SPHERICAL DECONVOLUTION; TISSUE MICROSTRUCTURE; CORPUS-CALLOSUM; WATER DIFFUSION; SIMPLEX-METHOD; AXON DIAMETER; TENSOR MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.064
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Advances in biophysical multi-compartment modeling for diffusion MRI (dMRI) have gained popularity because of greater specificity than DTI in relating the dMRI signal to underlying cellular microstructure. A large range of these diffusion microstructure models have been developed and each of the popular models comes with its own, often different, optimization algorithm, noise model and initialization strategy to estimate its parameter maps. Since data fit, accuracy and precision is hard to verify, this creates additional challenges to comparability and generalization of results from diffusion microstructure models. In addition, non-linear optimization is computationally expensive leading to very long run times, which can be prohibitive in large group or population studies. In this technical note we investigate the performance of several optimization algorithms and initialization strategies over a few of the most popular diffusion microstructure models, including NODDI and CHARMED. We evaluate whether a single well performing optimization approach exists that could be applied to many models and would equate both run time and fit aspects. All models, algorithms and strategies were implemented on the Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) to remove run time constraints, with which we achieve whole brain dataset fits in seconds to minutes. We then evaluated fit, accuracy, precision and run time for different models of differing complexity against three common optimization algorithms and three parameter initialization strategies. Variability of the achieved quality of fit in actual data was evaluated on ten subjects of each of two population studies with a different acquisition protocol. We find that optimization algorithms and multi-step optimization approaches have a considerable influence on performance and stability over subjects and over acquisition protocols. The gradient-free Powell conjugate-direction algorithm was found to outperform other common algorithms in terms of run time, fit, accuracy and precision. Parameter initialization approaches were found to be relevant especially for more complex models, such as those involving several fiber orientations per voxel. For these, a fitting cascade initializing or fixing parameter values in a later optimization step from simpler models in an earlier optimization step further improved run time, fit, accuracy and precision compared to a single step fit. This establishes and makes available standards by which robust fit and accuracy can be achieved in shorter run times. This is especially relevant for the use of diffusion microstructure modeling in large group or population studies and in combining microstructure parameter maps with tractography results.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 96
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robust and Fast Markov Chain Monte Carlo Sampling of Diffusion MRI Microstructure Models
    Harms, Robbert L.
    Roebroeck, Alard
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROINFORMATICS, 2018, 12
  • [2] Fast and robust quantification of uncertainty in non-linear diffusion MRI models
    Harms, R. L.
    Fritz, F. J.
    Schoenmakers, S.
    Roebroeck, A.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2024, 285
  • [3] Assessing Myocardial Microstructure With Biophysical Models of Diffusion MRI
    Farzi, Mohsen
    McClymont, Darryl
    Whittington, Hannah
    Zdora, Marie-Christine
    Khazin, Leah
    Lygate, Craig A.
    Rau, Christoph
    Dall'Armellina, Erica
    Teh, Irvin
    Schneider, Juergen E.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2021, 40 (12) : 3775 - 3786
  • [4] Accelerated Microstructure Imaging via Convex Optimization (AMICO) from diffusion MRI data
    Daducci, Alessandro
    Canales-Rodriguez, Erick J.
    Zhang, Hui
    Dyrby, Tim B.
    Alexander, Daniel C.
    Thiran, Jean-Philippe
    NEUROIMAGE, 2015, 105 : 32 - 44
  • [5] Diffusion MRI microstructure models with in vivo human brain Connectome data: results from a multi-group comparison
    Ferizi, Uran
    Scherrer, Benoit
    Schneider, Torben
    Alipoor, Mohammad
    Eufracio, Odin
    Fick, Rutger H. J.
    Deriche, Rachid
    Nilsson, Markus
    Loya-Olivas, Ana K.
    Rivera, Mariano
    Poot, Dirk H. J.
    Ramirez-Manzanares, Alonso
    Marroquin, Jose L.
    Rokem, Ariel
    Potter, Christian
    Dougherty, Robert F.
    Sakaie, Ken
    Wheeler-Kingshott, Claudia
    Warfield, Simon K.
    Witzel, Thomas
    Wald, Lawrence L.
    Raya, Jose G.
    Alexander, Daniel C.
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2017, 30 (09)
  • [6] Placenta microstructure and microcirculation imaging with diffusion MRI
    Slator, Paddy J.
    Hutter, Jana
    McCabe, Laura
    Gomes, Ana Dos Santos
    Price, Anthony N.
    Panagiotaki, Eleftheria
    Rutherford, Mary A.
    Hajnal, Joseph V.
    Alexander, Daniel C.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2018, 80 (02) : 756 - 766
  • [7] Assessing white matter microstructure of the newborn with multi-shell diffusion MRI and biophysical compartment models
    Kunz, Nicolas
    Zhang, Hui
    Vasung, Lana
    O'Brien, Kieran R.
    Assaf, Yaniv
    Lazeyras, Francois
    Alexander, Daniel C.
    Hueppi, Petra S.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2014, 96 : 288 - 299
  • [8] Imaging brain microstructure with diffusion MRI: practicality and applications
    Alexander, Daniel C.
    Dyrby, Tim B.
    Nilsson, Markus
    Zhang, Hui
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2019, 32 (04)
  • [9] Microstructure with diffusion MRI: what scale we are sensitive to?
    Kiselev, Valerij G.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2021, 347
  • [10] Half Way There: Theoretical Considerations for Power Laws and Sticks in Diffusion MRI for Tissue Microstructure
    Hall, Matt G.
    Ingo, Carson
    MATHEMATICS, 2021, 9 (16)