Realistic Advantages of Early Surgical Drain Removal after Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Single-Institution Retrospective Study

被引:4
作者
Yoon, So-Jeong [1 ]
Yoon, So-Kyung [1 ]
Jung, Ji-Hye [1 ]
Han, In-Woong [1 ]
Choi, Dong-Wook [1 ]
Heo, Jin-Seok [1 ]
Shin, Sang-Hyun [1 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Div Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, Dept Surg, Sch Med,Samsung Med Ctr, Seoul 06351, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
pancreatoduodenectomy; postoperative pancreatic fistula; surgical drain; perianastomotic drain; enhanced recovery after surgery; PANCREATIC FISTULA; RISK;
D O I
10.3390/jcm10122716
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The latest guidelines from the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society stated that early drain removal after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is beneficial in decreasing complications including postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPFs). This study aimed to ascertain the actual benefits of early drain removal after PD. The data of 450 patients who underwent PD between 2018 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The surgical outcomes were compared between patients whose drains were removed within 3 postoperative days (early removal group) and after 5 days (late removal group). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for clinically relevant POPFs (CR-POPFs). Among the patients with drain fluid amylase < 5000 IU on the first postoperative day, the early removal group had fewer complications and shorter hospital stays than the late removal group (30.9% vs. 54.5%, p < 0.001; 9.8 vs. 12.5 days, p = 0.030, respectively). The incidences of specific complications including CR-POPFs were comparable between the two groups. Risk factor analysis showed that early drain removal did not increase CR-POPFs (p = 0.163). Although early drain removal has not been identified as apparently beneficial, this study showed that it may contribute to an early return to normal life without increasing complications.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Centralization of Pancreatic Surgery Improves Results: Review
    Ahola, R.
    Sand, J.
    Laukkarinen, J.
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 109 (01) : 4 - 10
  • [2] The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After
    Bassi, Claudio
    Marchegiani, Giovanni
    Dervenis, Christos
    Sarr, Micheal
    Abu Hilal, Mohammad
    Adham, Mustapha
    Allen, Peter
    Andersson, Roland
    Asbun, Horacio J.
    Besselink, Marc G.
    Conlon, Kevin
    Del Chiaro, Marco
    Falconi, Massimo
    Fernandez-Cruz, Laureano
    Fernandez-Del Castillo, Carlos
    Fingerhut, Abe
    Friess, Helmut
    Gouma, Dirk J.
    Hackert, Thilo
    Izbicki, Jakob
    Lillemoe, Keith D.
    Neoptolemos, John P.
    Olah, Attila
    Schulick, Richard
    Shrikhande, Shailesh V.
    Takada, Tadahiro
    Takaori, Kyoichi
    Traverso, William
    Vollmer, Charles
    Wolfgang, Christopher L.
    Yeo, Charles J.
    Salvia, Roberto
    Buehler, Marcus
    [J]. SURGERY, 2017, 161 (03) : 584 - 591
  • [3] Early Versus Late Drain Removal After Standard Pancreatic Resections Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial
    Bassi, Claudio
    Molinari, Enrico
    Malleo, Giuseppe
    Crippa, Stefano
    Butturini, Giovanni
    Salvia, Roberto
    Talamini, Giorgio
    Pederzoli, Paolo
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2010, 252 (02) : 207 - 214
  • [4] Variation in Drain Management After Pancreatoduodenectomy Early Versus Delayed Removal
    Beane, Joal D.
    House, Michael G.
    Ceppa, Eugene P.
    Dolejs, Scott C.
    Pitt, Henry A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2019, 269 (04) : 718 - 724
  • [5] What is a better predictor of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD): postoperative day one drain amylase (POD1DA) or the fistula risk score (FRS)?
    Bertens, Kimberly A.
    Crown, Angelena
    Clanton, Jesse
    Alenni, Farzad
    Alseidi, Adnan A.
    Biehl, Thomas
    Helton, William S.
    Rocha, Flavio G.
    [J]. HPB, 2017, 19 (01) : 75 - 81
  • [6] Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Braga, Marco
    Pecorelli, Nicol
    Ariotti, Riccardo
    Capretti, Giovanni
    Greco, Massimiliano
    Balzano, Gianpaolo
    Castoldi, Renato
    Beretta, Luigi
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 38 (11) : 2960 - 2966
  • [7] A Prospectively Validated Clinical Risk Score Accurately Predicts Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreatoduodenectomy
    Callery, Mark P.
    Pratt, Wande B.
    Kent, Tara S.
    Chaikof, Elliot L.
    Vollmer, Charles M., Jr.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2013, 216 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [8] Impact of Surgeon and Hospital Volume on Mortality, Length of Stay, and Cost of Pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Enomoto, Laura M.
    Gusani, Niraj J.
    Dillon, Peter W.
    Hollenbeak, Christopher S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2014, 18 (04) : 690 - 700
  • [9] Systematic review and meta-analysis of the volume-outcome relationship in pancreatic surgery
    Gooiker, G. A.
    van Gijn, W.
    Wouters, M. W. J. M.
    Post, P. N.
    van de Velde, C. J. H.
    Tollenaar, R. A. E. M.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 98 (04) : 485 - 494
  • [10] Risk prediction platform for pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy using artificial intelligence
    Han, In Woong
    Cho, Kyeongwon
    Ryu, Youngju
    Shin, Sang Hyun
    Heo, Jin Seok
    Choi, Dong Wook
    Chung, Myung Jin
    Kwon, Oh Chul
    Cho, Baek Hwan
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 26 (30) : 4453 - 4464