A techno-economic analysis of solar catalytic chemical looping biomass refinery for sustainable production of high purity hydrogen

被引:17
|
作者
Sajjadi, Baharak [1 ]
Chen, Wei -Yin [1 ]
Fan, Maohong [2 ,3 ]
Rony, Asif [2 ,3 ]
Saxe, Jennie [4 ]
Leszczynski, Jerzy [5 ]
Righetti, Tara K. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mississippi, Dept Chem Engn, University, MS 38677 USA
[2] Univ Wyoming, Dept Chem, Laramie, WY 82071 USA
[3] Univ Wyoming, Dept Petr Engn, Laramie, WY 82071 USA
[4] Univ Delaware, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Newark, DE 19716 USA
[5] Jackson State Univ, Dept Chem Phys & Atmospher Sci, Interdisciplinary Ctr Nanotox, Jackson, MS 39217 USA
[6] Univ Wyoming, Coll Law, Laramie, WY 82071 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Techno-Economic Analysis; Chemical Looping; Hydrogen; Pyrolysis; Gasification; Solar energy; AIR-STEAM GASIFICATION; CORN STOVER; FLUIDIZED-BED; SYNGAS PRODUCTION; FAST PYROLYSIS; GAS-PRODUCTION; SIMULATION; CA2FE2O5; MODEL; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114341
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Compared to traditional biomass and coal-fired power plants, a process that includes integrated pyrolysis and subsequent gasification is a promising technology to deliver a larger electrical output through the production of high-purity hydrogen with a low carbon footprint. Chemical looping can further enhance the biomass contribution to the global renewable energy demand while fulfilling the stringent CO2 emission cuts needed in the energy sector. This study aims at investigating the feasibility of developing a solar catalytic chemical looping biomass refinery (SCCLBR) power plant for sustainable production of energy using a comprehensive plant modeling and techno-economic assessment. The plant is composed of 7 sequential units: i) biomass preparation (drying, transferring, and grinding), ii) reacting unit (SCCLBR), iii) water gas shift unit and heat recovery, iv) CO2 and H2S separation (Rectisol Process), v) sulfur removal (Claus Process), vi) air separation and vii) catalyst regeneration. The simulation was performed for 1-6 tonne/hour of biomass as input. The effect of key variables (feedstock load, water injection, and temperature) on the economic performance of the plant were analyzed. The simulated results of the chemical looping reactor were validated against the experimental results, while the results of Rectisol and air separation units were validated against the thermodynamic simulation. The results demonstrated that the CCLBR (without solar integration) and integrated SCCLBR can reach the efficiency of 34% and 41% respectively, yet the results have not been optimized. The sensitivity analysis indicated that water injection rate is the most influential parameter, which can even suppress the impact of biomass loading rate. A separate thermodynamic simulation was also performed to investigate the reaction equilibrium of oxygen carrier regeneration (Ca2Fe2O5) using CO2. The results demonstrated that a temperature above 730 degrees C is required to avoid carbonation (Fe2O3 and CaCO3 production). The maximum greenhouse gas emission in SCCLBR is 10.70, which is significantly lower than traditional coal-to-hydrogen and biomass-to-hydrogen power plants. It has also been found that across varying feedstock input rates, greenhouse gas emissions average 12.8% lower when solar PV supplements refinery power needs; optimization of the steam/biomass ratio may reduce emissions even further.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Techno-Economic Analysis of Hydrogen and Electricity Production by Biomass Calcium Looping Gasification
    Shaikh, Abdul Rahim
    Wang, Qinhui
    Han, Long
    Feng, Yi
    Sharif, Zohaib
    Li, Zhixin
    Cen, Jianmeng
    Kumar, Sunel
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (04)
  • [2] Synergistic solar energy integration for enhanced biomass chemical looping hydrogen production: Thermodynamics and techno-economic analyses
    Chen, Xiangxiang
    Sun, Zhuang
    Kuo, Po-Chih
    Aziz, Muhammad
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2024, 485
  • [3] Techno-economic analysis of sustainable methanol and ammonia production by chemical looping hydrogen generation from waste plastic
    Palone, Orlando
    Gagliardi, Gabriele G.
    Mechelli, Marco
    Cedola, Luca
    Borello, Domenico
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 292
  • [4] Investigating the techno-economic and environmental performance of chemical looping technology for hydrogen production
    Anaya, Karina
    Oni, Abayomi Olufemi
    Kumar, Amit
    SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2023, 56
  • [5] Development and techno-economic analyses of a novel hydrogen production process via chemical looping
    Bahzad, Husain
    Shah, Nilay
    Mac Dowell, Niall
    Boot-Handford, Matthew
    Soltani, Salman Masoudi
    Minh Ho
    Fennell, Paul S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2019, 44 (39) : 21251 - 21263
  • [6] Hydrogen production from woody biomass gasification: a techno-economic analysis
    Gubin, Veronica
    Benedikt, Florian
    Thelen, Ferdinand
    Hammerschmid, Martin
    Popov, Tom
    Hofbauer, Hermann
    Mueller, Stefan
    BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2024, 18 (04): : 818 - 836
  • [7] Techno-economic analysis of solar/wind power based hydrogen production
    Hasan, Masad Mezher
    Genc, Gamze
    FUEL, 2022, 324
  • [8] Techno-economic analysis of solar/wind power based hydrogen production
    Hasan, Masad Mezher
    Genç, Gamze
    Fuel, 2022, 324
  • [9] Mild catalytic pyrolysis of biomass for production of transportation fuels: a techno-economic analysis
    Thilakaratne, Rajeeva
    Brown, Tristan
    Li, Yihua
    Hu, Guiping
    Brown, Robert
    GREEN CHEMISTRY, 2014, 16 (02) : 627 - 636
  • [10] Biomass direct chemical looping for hydrogen and power co-production: Process configuration, simulation, thermal integration and techno-economic assessment
    Cormos, Calin-Cristian
    FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 137 : 16 - 23