Prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: a systematic review of termination rates (1995-2011)

被引:149
作者
Natoli, Jaime L. [1 ]
Ackerman, Deborah L. [2 ]
McDermott, Suzanne [1 ]
Edwards, Janice G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[2] Oregon Coll Oriental Med, Portland, OR USA
关键词
ELECTIVE TERMINATION; SYNDROME PREGNANCIES; PARENTAL DECISIONS; SCREENING-PROGRAM; MATERNAL AGE; POPULATION; TRISOMY-21; ABNORMALITIES; CHILDREN; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1002/pd.2910
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Objective The objective of this study was to review the published literature on pregnancy termination following a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome in the United States. Method A systematic search of US English-language articles (1995-2011) was conducted to identify primary research studies that reported data for pregnancies with definitive prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome with subsequent pregnancy termination. Studies that provided indirect estimates of pregnancy termination, such as mathematical models, were excluded. The weighted mean termination rate was calculated across studies. Results Twenty-four studies were accepted. The weighted mean termination rate was 67% (range: 61%-93%) among seven population-based studies, 85% (range: 60%-90%) among nine hospital-based studies, and 50% (range: 0%-100%) among eight anomaly-based studies. Evidence suggests that termination rates have decreased in recent years. Termination rates also varied with maternal age, gestational age, and maternal race/ethnicity. Conclusion This systematic review presents the largest synthesis of United States data on termination rates following a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome. Evidence suggests that termination rates are lower than noted in a previous review that was based on less contemporary studies and had an international focus. Heterogeneity across studies suggests that a summary termination rate may not be applicable to the entire US population. (C) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 153
页数:12
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins, 2007, Obstet Gynecol, V109, P217
  • [2] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2007, Obstet Gynecol, V110, P1459
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2007, Thompson Thompson Genetics in Medicine
  • [4] [Anonymous], GUID COND BIRTH DEF
  • [5] Benn PA, 1998, PRENATAL DIAG, V18, P319, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199804)18:4<319::AID-PD261>3.0.CO
  • [6] 2-Q
  • [7] Changes in the utilization of prenatal diagnosis
    Benn, PA
    Egan, JFX
    Fang, M
    Smith-Bindman, R
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (06) : 1255 - 1260
  • [8] THE CENTRALIZED PRENATAL GENETICS SCREENING-PROGRAM OF NEW-YORK-CITY .3. THE 1ST 7,000 CASES
    BENN, PA
    HSU, LYF
    CARLSON, A
    TANNENBAUM, HL
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 1985, 20 (02): : 369 - 384
  • [9] Bishop J, 1997, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V145, P134
  • [10] Britt DW, 2000, AM J MED GENET, V93, P410, DOI 10.1002/1096-8628(20000828)93:5<410::AID-AJMG12>3.3.CO