Does Research Output Cause Economic Growth or Vice Versa? Evidence From 34 OECD Countries

被引:39
作者
Ntuli, Hamilton [1 ]
Inglesi-Lotz, Roula [2 ]
Chang, Tsangyao [3 ]
Pouris, Anastassios [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Treasury, ZA-0002 Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa
[2] Univ Pretoria, Dept Econ, ZA-0002 Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa
[3] Feng Chia Univ, Dept Finance, Taichung 40724, Taiwan
[4] Univ Pretoria, Inst Technol Innovat, ZA-0002 Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa
关键词
national productivity; scholarly publishing; econometrics; countries and regions; international aspects; IMPACT; INDICATORS; INFERENCE; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1002/asi.23285
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The causal relation between research and economic growth is of particular importance for political support of science and technology as well as for academic purposes. This article revisits the causal relationship between research articles published and economic growth in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries for the period 1981-2011, using bootstrap panel causality analysis, which accounts for cross-section dependency and heterogeneity across countries. The article, by the use of the specific method and the choice of the country group, makes a contribution to the existing literature. Our empirical results support unidirectional causality running from research output (in terms of total number of articles published) to economic growth for the US, Finland, Hungary, and Mexico; the opposite causality from economic growth to research articles published for Canada, France, Italy, New Zealand, the UK, Austria, Israel, and Poland; and no causality for the rest of the countries. Our findings provide important policy implications for research policies and strategies for OECD countries.
引用
收藏
页码:1709 / 1716
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, World Development Indicators
[2]   What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? a literature survey [J].
Bornmann, Lutz .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 64 (02) :217-233
[3]   A parametric approach to the estimation of cointegration vectors in panel data [J].
Breitung, J .
ECONOMETRIC REVIEWS, 2005, 24 (02) :151-173
[4]   THE LAGRANGE MULTIPLIER TEST AND ITS APPLICATIONS TO MODEL-SPECIFICATION IN ECONOMETRICS [J].
BREUSCH, TS ;
PAGAN, AR .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1980, 47 (01) :239-253
[5]   FORGING INTO THE INNOVATION LEAD - A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SCIENTIFIC CAPACITY [J].
Chuang, Yun-Wen ;
Lee, Ling-Chu ;
Hung, Wen-Chi ;
Lin, Pin-Hua .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2010, 14 (03) :511-529
[6]   Science in America Latina:: A comparison of bibliometric and scientific-technical indicators [J].
De Moya-Anegón, F ;
Herrero-Solana, V .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 1999, 46 (02) :299-320
[7]  
Fedderke J.W., 2005, TECHNOLOGY HUMAN CAP
[8]   The R&D performance of the South African manufacturing sector, 1970-1993 [J].
Fedderke, Johannes ;
Schirmer, Stefan .
ECONOMIC CHANGE AND RESTRUCTURING, 2006, 39 (1-2) :125-151
[9]   Commentary - Some aspects of causal relationships [J].
Granger, CWJ .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2003, 112 (01) :69-71
[10]   The influence of scientific research output of academics on economic growth in South Africa: an autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) application [J].
Inglesi-Lotz, R. ;
Pouris, A. .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2013, 95 (01) :129-139