Catch-Up Growth in Full-Term Small for Gestational Age Infants: A Systematic Review

被引:73
作者
Campisi, Susan C. [1 ,7 ]
Carbone, Sarah E. [2 ,3 ]
Zlotkin, Stanley [1 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Nutr Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Lawrence S Bloomberg Fac Nursing, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Pediat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Munk Sch Publ Affairs & Publ Policy, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Hosp Sick Children, Ctr Global Child Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
small for gestational age; catch-up growth; systematic review; full-term infants; growth standards; INSULIN SENSITIVITY; HEAD CIRCUMFERENCE; CHILDREN; BIRTH; WEIGHT; STANDARDS; LENGTH; SECRETION; CONSENSUS; HEIGHT;
D O I
10.1093/advances/nmy091
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
This is the first systematic review to examine the global prevalence of catch-up growth (CUG) in small for gestational age (SGA) infants who were born at full term (FT). Size at birth and subsequent growth is an important indicator of neonatal and adult health. Globally, 16% of infants are SGA at birth, ranging from 7% in industrialized countries to 41.5% in South Asia. SGA infants are at increased risk for negative developmental and adult health outcomes. Some achieve CUG but others do not. CUG has immediate and late health implications especially in low-and middle-income countries. This systematic review sought to determine the global prevalence of CUG among FT-SGA infants. We performed a literature search of MEDLINE, Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus, as well as grey literature databases, and identified 3137 studies. The final analysis included 11 studies. The median prevalence of CUG was 87.4% across all definitions of SGA and CUG. However, multiple definitions were used to classify SGA and CUG. Nine unique reference populations were used to classify SGA, and 6 to approximate CUG. Due to this heterogeneity, a meta-analysis could not be conducted. Program implementation for this vulnerable group of infants is dependent on proper classification. Given the wide range of definitions and reference standards used in the past, it is not possible to determine the global need for programs to address CUG for FT-SGA infants or to rationally plan any such programs. We highlight the need and propose standard definitions and references for SGA and CUG.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 111
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   NATURAL GROWTH IN CHILDREN BORN SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE WITH AND WITHOUT CATCH-UP GROWTH [J].
ALBERTSSONWIKLAND, K ;
KARLBERG, J .
ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 1994, 83 :64-71
[2]  
[Anonymous], HORMONE RES PAEDIAT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, ADV DATA, V314, P1, DOI DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-6-146
[4]  
[Anonymous], CONTRIBUTIONS EMBRYO
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1995, PHYS STAT UINT ANT
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, JOANNA BRIGGS INSTIT
[7]  
Cameron N, 2012, HUMAN GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2ND EDITION, P1, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-383882-7.00001-5
[8]   Associated Factors for Accelerated Growth in Childhood: A Systematic Review [J].
Chrestani, Maria Aurora ;
Santos, Ina S. ;
Horta, Bernardo L. ;
Dumith, Samuel C. ;
Souza de Oliveira Dode, Maria Alice .
MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2013, 17 (03) :512-519
[9]   WHO Child Growth Standards based on length/height, weight and age [J].
de Onis, Mercedes ;
Martorell, Reynaldo ;
Garza, Cutberto ;
Lartey, Anna .
ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2006, 95 :76-85
[10]   Update on the Implementation of the WHO Child Growth Standards [J].
de Onis, Mercedes .
NUTRITION AND GROWTH, 2013, 106 :75-82