Holding Control of Bus Bunching without Explicit Service Headways

被引:10
作者
Zimmermann, Lucas [1 ]
Kraus, Werner, Jr. [1 ]
Koehler, Luiz Alberto [2 ]
Camponogara, Eduardo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Dept Automat & Syst Engn, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
[2] Univ Reg Blumenau, Dept Elect & Telecommun Engn, Blumenau, SC, Brazil
来源
IFAC PAPERSONLINE | 2016年 / 49卷 / 03期
关键词
Bus bunching; headway control; predictive control; feedback control; microsimulation analysis; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.035
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Holding-based control methods for bus operation are examined to point out that allowing greater variance in headways between consecutive buses leads to possible gains in total delay, as compared to strict adherence to a service headway. This result, obtained empirically, indicates that optimal operation is not necessarily attained with even headways. Such finding is related to the well-known fact that there should not be too many control points for headway corrections when operating under the traditional method of scheduled departures from bus stations. Current feedback and predictive methods, however, can be productively applied at all stations, hence the importance of studying the effects of frequent control actions. Several feedback schemes are tested, as well as a rolling horizon predictive control method that seeks to minimize onboard and at, station delays. The latter has 110 headway reference and hence yields larger headway variations. The scenario is a BET corridor modeled in a microsimulation environment,. Simulation results indicate gains of 29% in total delay for predictive control in relation to open loop operation, and superior performance when compared to the tested proportional feedback control methods. (C) 2016, IFAC (International Federation of Automatic Control) Hosting by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 214
页数:6
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Impacts of Holding Control Strategies on Transit Performance Bus Simulation Model Analysis
    Cats, Oded
    Larijani, Anahid Nabavi
    Koutsopoulos, Haris N.
    Burghout, Wilco
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2011, (2216) : 51 - 58
  • [2] The holding problem with real-time information available
    Eberlein, XJ
    Wilson, NHM
    Bernstein, D
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE, 2001, 35 (01) : 1 - 18
  • [3] Iterative Quadratic Optimization for the Bus Holding Control Problem
    Koehler, Luiz Alberto
    Kraus, Werner, Jr.
    Camponogara, Eduardo
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2011, 12 (04) : 1568 - 1575
  • [4] Newell G F., 1964, Proceedings of the 2nd Australian Road Research Board. vol, V2, P388
  • [5] Strathman JamesG., 2001, Journal of Public Transportation, V4, P1, DOI DOI 10.5038/2375-0901.4.1.1
  • [6] Transport Simulation Systems, 2012, AIMSUN DYN SIM US MA
  • [7] Turnquist M., 1982, NTISDOTRSPADPB508127
  • [8] Whelan Gerard., 2009, P 1 INT C CHOICE MOD, V30
  • [9] Wright L., 2007, BUS RAPID TRANSIT PL, V3rd
  • [10] Dynamic bus holding strategies for schedule reliability: Optimal linear control and performance analysis
    Xuan, Yiguang
    Argote, Juan
    Daganzo, Carlos F.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2011, 45 (10) : 1831 - 1845