Nonstandard, not substandard - The relationship among work arrangements, work attitudes, and job performance

被引:59
作者
Broschak, Joseph R. [1 ]
Davis-Blake, Alison [2 ]
Block, Emily S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Eller Coll Management, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Carlson Sch Management, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
nonstandard work arrangements; employment relations; flexibility; job performance;
D O I
10.1177/0730888407309604
中图分类号
F24 [劳动经济];
学科分类号
020106 ; 020207 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The authors investigate how nonstandard work arrangements shape work attitudes and behaviors. They find that attitudes and behaviors vary across different types of nonstandard work arrangements. As expected, retention part-time workers have more positive and agency temporary workers more negative attitudes toward their work arrangements than do standard workers. But contrary to conventional wisdom about temporary work arrangements, agency temporary workers who have opportunities to transition to standard employment arrangements have more positive attitudes toward supervisors and coworkers and are better performers than their peers in standard work arrangements. Part-time arrangements designed to retain valued workers do not produce increased commitment or other attitudinal benefits consistent with retention. The authors discuss the implications of the findings for the study of nonstandard work and the management of nonstandard workers.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 43
页数:41
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   THE MEASUREMENT AND ANTECEDENTS OF AFFECTIVE, CONTINUANCE AND NORMATIVE COMMITMENT TO THE ORGANIZATION [J].
ALLEN, NJ ;
MEYER, JP .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 63 (01) :1-18
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Working in Restructured Workplaces: New Directions for the Sociology of Work
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1968, SOCIAL STRUCTURE SOC
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, RELATIONAL WEALTH NE
[5]   Work-based critical incidents and problem drinking - Taking intrusive reactions, traumatic distress, and the kindling effect into account [J].
Bamberger, PA .
WORK AND OCCUPATIONS, 2005, 32 (03) :257-289
[6]  
Beard K. M., 1995, TRENDS ORG BEHAV, P109
[7]  
Becker G., 1975, Human capital
[8]  
BEFORT SF, 2003, BERKELEY J EMP LAB L, V24, P153, DOI DOI 10.15779/Z38T63T
[9]  
Belous R.S., 1989, CONTINGENT EC GROWTH
[10]  
BENDAPUDI V, 2003, HUMAN RESOURCE PLANN, V26, P24