Systematic review of biological effects of exposure to static electric fields. Part II: Invertebrates and plants

被引:28
作者
Schmiedchen, Kristina [1 ]
Petri, Anne-Kathrin [1 ]
Driessen, Sarah [1 ]
Bailey, William H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Res Ctr Bioelectromagnet Interact, Pauwelsstr 30, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
[2] Exponent, Ctr Occupat & Environm Hlth Risk Assessment, 17000 Sci Dr,Suite 200, Bowie, MD 20715 USA
关键词
Static electric field; High-voltage direct current; Environmental impact; Field perception; Physiological functions; ELECTROSTATIC FIELDS; GROWTH; DC; PERCEPTION; DROSOPHILA; MECHANISM; OZONE; LIGHT; SEED;
D O I
10.1016/j.envres.2017.09.013
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Background: The construction of high-voltage direct current (HVDC) lines for the long-distance transport of energy is becoming increasingly popular. This has raised public concern about potential environmental impacts of the static electric fields (EF) produced under and near HVDC power lines. As the second part of a comprehensive literature analysis, the aim of this systematic review was to assess the effects of static EF exposure on biological functions in invertebrates and plants and to provide the basis for an environmental impact assessment of such exposures. Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was used to guide the methodological conduct and reporting. Results: Thirty-three studies - 14 invertebrate and 19 plant studies - met the eligibility criteria and were included in this review. The reported behavioral responses of insects and planarians upon exposure strongly suggest that invertebrates are able to perceive the presence of a static EF. Many other studies reported effects on physiological functions that were expressed as, for example, altered metabolic activity or delayed reproductive and developmental stages in invertebrates. In plants, leaf damage, alterations in germination rates, growth and yield, or variations in the concentration of essential elements, for example, have been reported. However, these physiological responses and changes in plant morphology appear to be secondary to surface stimulation by the static EF or caused by concomitant parameters of the electrostatic environment. Furthermore, all of the included studies suffered from methodological flaws, which lowered credibility in the results. Conclusion: At field levels encountered from natural sources or HVDC lines (< 35 kV/m), the available data provide reliable evidence that static EF can trigger behavioral responses in invertebrates, but they do not provide evidence for adverse effects of static EF on other biological functions in invertebrates and plants. At far higher field levels (> 35 kV/m), adverse effects on physiology and morphology, presumably caused by corona-action, appear to be more likely. Higher quality studies are needed to unravel the role of air ions, ozone, nitric oxide and corona current on alterations in physiological functions and morphology.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 76
页数:17
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
ALTMANN G, 1969, Archiv fuer Meteorologie Geophysik und Bioklimatologie Serie B Klimatologie Unweltmeteorologie Strahlungsforschung, V17, P269, DOI 10.1007/BF02243170
[2]  
ALTMANN G., 1959, Zeitschrift fur Bienenforschung, V4, P199
[3]  
[Anonymous], MINN ENV QUAL BOARD
[4]  
[Anonymous], BIOL EFFECTS ULTRA H
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1954, VERH DTSCH ZOOL GES
[6]  
[Anonymous], BIOL EFF EM HOCHSP G
[7]  
[Anonymous], J SCI FOOD AGR
[8]  
[Anonymous], P PA ACAD SCI
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2015, OP POT HLTH EFF EXP
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2015, HDB COND LIT BAS HLT