A hybrid model to support decision making in the stroke clinical pathway

被引:4
|
作者
Boareto, Pedro Antonio [1 ]
Safanelli, Juliana [2 ]
Liberato, Rafaela B. [2 ]
Moro, Carla H. C. [3 ]
Junior, Jose Eduardo Pecora [4 ]
Moro, Claudia [5 ]
Loures, Eduardo de Freitas Rocha [1 ]
Santos, Eduardo Alves Portela [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Pontif Catholic Univ Parana, Dept Prod & Syst Engn, 1155 Imaculada Conceicao St, BR-80215901 Curitiba, PR, Brazil
[2] Joinville Stroke Registry, Joinville, SC, Brazil
[3] Municipal Hosp Sao Jose, Joinville, SC, Brazil
[4] Fed Univ Curitiba, Dept Appl Social Sci, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
[5] Pontif Catholic Univ Parana, Dept Hlth Technol, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
关键词
Process mining; Discrete Event Simulation; Stroke; Healthcare; Decision making support; PROMETHEE II method; DISCRETE-EVENT SIMULATION; HEALTH-CARE; RESOURCES; FRAMEWORK; EVALUATE; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.simpat.2022.102602
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Health processes are highly complex and sensitive, requiring continued improvement. Several methodologies have been developed to support these improvement processes, many of which apply Process Mining (PM) to investigate the current states of processes. Some even use Discrete Event Simulation (DES) techniques to explore alternative scenarios. Among the ones using DES, some rely on Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods (MCDM) to guide them in choosing the best scenario, especially in complex decision-making environments. However, no author presents a single framework combining all three techniques mentioned above, to wit, PM, DES, and MCDM. This paper targets developing this combination and exploring its usefulness in guiding process improvement in the health services area. The clinical path for stroke patients, covering from onset of symptoms to hospital discharge, was used as a test case. The research demonstrated that this proposal provided an innovative diagnostic of the process, identifying the activities that should be improved to obtain the most significant results in the process management indicators. Identifying the activities ensures that the impacts of these improvements are indicated with statistical ac-curacy and eliminating the need to perform on-site testing to test for the best solutions. The research does not address root cause diagnosis of activities to be improved. Therefore, further research needs to be undertaken on an extension of the model to enhance root cause analysis capabilities with a view to validating the framework proposed in other environments and, in this way, assess its replicability.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Validation of a decision support model for investigation and improvement in stroke thrombolysis
    Keshtkaran, Mahsa
    Churilov, Leonid
    Hearne, John
    Abbasi, Babak
    Meretoja, Atte
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 253 (01) : 154 - 169
  • [22] Sensory impairment after stroke: Exploring therapists' clinical decision making
    Doyle, Susan D.
    Bennett, Sally
    Dudgeon, Brian J.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY-REVUE CANADIENNE D ERGOTHERAPIE, 2014, 81 (04): : 215 - 225
  • [23] Shared decision-making in stroke: an evolving approach to improved patient care
    Armstrong, Melissa J.
    STROKE AND VASCULAR NEUROLOGY, 2017, 2 (02) : 84 - 87
  • [24] A Hybrid Multiple Criteria Decision Making Model for Supplier Selection
    Wu, Chung-Min
    Hsieh, Ching-Lin
    Chang, Kuei-Lun
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2013, 2013
  • [25] Artificial intelligence in clinical decision support and outcome prediction - applications in stroke
    Yeo, Melissa
    Kok, Hong Kuan
    Kutaiba, Numan
    Maingard, Julian
    Thijs, Vincent
    Tahayori, Bahman
    Russell, Jeremy
    Jhamb, Ashu
    Chandra, Ronil V.
    Brooks, Mark
    Barras, Christen D.
    Asadi, Hamed
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, : 518 - 528
  • [26] LERM (Logical Elements Rule Method): A method for assessing and formalizing clinical rules for decision support
    Medlock, Stephanie
    Opondo, Dedan
    Eslami, Saeid
    Askari, Marjan
    Wierenga, Peter
    de Rooij, Sophia E.
    Abu-Hanna, Ameen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2011, 80 (04) : 286 - 295
  • [27] In Silico Evaluation of Algorithm-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems: Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Dorosan, Michael
    Chen, Ya-Lin
    Zhuang, Qingyuan
    Lam, Shao Wei Sean
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2025, 14
  • [28] Update and recommendations in decision making referred to limitation of advanced life support treatment
    Estella, A.
    Saralegui, I
    Rubio Sanchiz, O.
    Hernandez-Tejedor, A.
    Lopez Camps, V
    Martin, M. C.
    Cabre Pericas, L.
    Masnou Burrallo, N.
    Recuerda Nunez, M.
    Monzon, J. L.
    MEDICINA INTENSIVA, 2020, 44 (02) : 101 - 112
  • [29] Acceptance of clinical decision support systems in Saudi healthcare organisations
    Aljarboa, Soliman
    Miah, Shah J.
    INFORMATION DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 39 (01) : 86 - 106
  • [30] Harnessing the power of clinical decision support systems: challenges and opportunities
    Chen, Zhao
    Liang, Ning
    Zhang, Haili
    Li, Huizhen
    Yang, Yijiu
    Zong, Xingyu
    Chen, Yaxin
    Wang, Yanping
    Shi, Nannan
    OPEN HEART, 2023, 10 (02):