Closure, Anticoagulation, or Antiplatelet Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke With Patent Foramen Ovale: Systematic Review of Randomized Trials, Sequential Meta-Analysis, and New Insights From the CLOSE Study

被引:116
作者
Turc, Guillaume [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Calvet, David [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Guerin, Patrice [5 ,6 ]
Sroussi, Marjorie [2 ,7 ]
Chatellier, Gilles [2 ,8 ,9 ]
Mas, Jean-Louis [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Hop St Anne, Dept Neurol, Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris 05, Sorbonne Paris Cite, Paris, France
[3] INSERM U894, Paris, France
[4] DHU Neurovasc, Paris, France
[5] Inst Thorax, Dept Cardiol, INSERM UMR 915, Nantes, France
[6] CHU Nantes, Inst Thorax, Nantes, France
[7] Cochin Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Paris, France
[8] Georges Pompidou European Hosp, AP HP, Epidemiol & Clin Res Unit, Paris, France
[9] INSERM CIC 1418, Paris, France
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | 2018年 / 7卷 / 12期
关键词
anticoagulation; patent foramen ovale; patent foramen ovale closure; stroke; TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACK; MEDICAL THERAPY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1161/JAHA.117.008356
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure, anticoagulation, and antiplatelet therapy to prevent stroke recurrence in patients with PFO-associated cryptogenic stroke. Methods and Results-We searched Medline, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE through March 2018. The primary outcome was stroke recurrence. Pooled incidences, hazard ratios, and risk ratios (RRs) were calculated in random-effects meta-analyses. PFO closure was associated with a lower risk of recurrent stroke compared with antithrombotic therapy (antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulation: 3560 patients from 6 RCTs; RR=0.36, 95% CI: 0.17-0.79; I-2=59%). The effect of PFO closure on stroke recurrence was larger in patients with atrial septal aneurysm or large shunt (RR=0.27, 95% CI, 0.11-0.70; I-2=42%) compared with patients without these anatomical features (RR=0.80, 95% CI, 0.43-1.47; I-2=12%). Major complications occurred in 2.40% (95% CI, 1.03-4.25; I-2=77%) of procedures. New-onset atrial fibrillation was more frequent in patients randomized to PFO closure versus antithrombotic therapy (RR=4.33, 95% CI, 2.37-7.89; I-2=14%). One RCT compared PFO closure versus anticoagulation (353 patients; hazard ratio=0.14, 95% CI, 0.00-1.45) and 2 RCTs compared PFO closure versus antiplatelet therapy (1137 patients; hazard ratio=0.18, 95% CI, 0.05-0.63; I-2=12%). Three RCTs compared anticoagulation versus antiplatelet therapy, with none showing a significant difference. Conclusions-PFO closure is superior to antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke recurrence after cryptogenic stroke. The annual absolute risk reduction of stroke was low, but it has to be tempered by a substantial time at risk (at least 5 years) in young and middle-aged patients. PFO closure was associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation.
引用
收藏
页数:37
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Percutaneous Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale in Patients with Cryptogenic Stroke - An Updated Comprehensive Meta-Analysis
    Sitwala, Puja
    Khalid, Muhammad Faisal
    Khattak, Furqan
    Bagai, Jayant
    Bhogal, Sukhdeep
    Ladia, Vatsal
    Mukherjee, Debabrata
    Daggubati, Ramesh
    Paul, Timir K.
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2019, 20 (08) : 687 - 694
  • [42] Updated meta-analysis of closure of patent foramen ovale versus medical therapy after cryptogenic stroke
    Bin Nasir, Usama
    Qureshi, Wacias T.
    Jogu, Humanatha
    Wolfe, Elizabeth
    Dutta, Abhishek
    Majeed, Chaudhry Nasir
    Tan, Walter A.
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2019, 20 (03) : 187 - 193
  • [43] Percutaneous closure versus medical therapy for stroke with patent foramen Ovale: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xin-Lin Zhang
    Li-Na Kang
    Lian Wang
    Biao Xu
    BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 18
  • [44] Recurrent Stroke and Patent Foramen Ovale A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Katsanos, Aristeidis H.
    Spence, J. David
    Bogiatzi, Chrysi
    Parissis, John
    Giannopoulos, Sotirios
    Frogoudaki, Alexandra
    Safouris, Apostolos
    Voumvourakis, Konstantinos
    Tsivgoulis, Georgios
    STROKE, 2014, 45 (11) : 3352 - 3359
  • [45] Stroke prevention by percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wolfrum, Mathias
    Froehlich, Georg M.
    Knapp, Guido
    Casaubon, Leanne K.
    DiNicolantonio, James J.
    Lansky, Alexandra J.
    Meier, Pascal
    HEART, 2014, 100 (05) : 389 - 395
  • [46] Patent foramen ovale closure versus medical therapy for prevention of recurrent cryptogenic embolism: updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Alushi, Brunilda
    Lauten, Alexander
    Cassese, Salvatore
    Colleran, Roisin
    Schuepke, Stefanie
    Rai, Himanshu
    Schunkert, Heribert
    Meier, Bernhard
    Landmesser, Ulf
    Kastrati, Adnan
    CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 107 (09) : 788 - 798
  • [47] Patent foramen ovale closure versus medical therapy after cryptogenic stroke: An updated meta-analysis of all randomized clinical trials
    Kheiri, Babikir
    Abdalla, Ahmed
    Osman, Mohammed
    Ahmed, Sahar
    Hassan, Mustafa
    Bachuwa, Ghassan
    CARDIOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 26 (01) : 47 - 55
  • [48] Recurrent Stroke Reduction with Patent Foramen Ovale Closure versus Medical Therapy Based on Patent Foramen Ovale Characteristics: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Garg, Aakash
    Thawabi, Mohammed
    Rout, Amit
    Sossou, Chris
    Cohen, Marc
    Kostis, John B.
    CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 144 (1-2) : 40 - 49
  • [49] Device Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale for Cryptogenic Stroke: Patient Selection and Outcomes According to New Randomized Trials
    Carroll, Adam M.
    Carroll, John D.
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS, 2019, 21 (06)
  • [50] The Fragility Index in Randomized Controlled Trials for Patent Foramen Ovale Closure in Cryptogenic Stroke
    Topcuoglu, Mehmet Akif
    Arsava, Ethem Murat
    JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2019, 28 (06) : 1636 - 1639