Closure, Anticoagulation, or Antiplatelet Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke With Patent Foramen Ovale: Systematic Review of Randomized Trials, Sequential Meta-Analysis, and New Insights From the CLOSE Study

被引:116
|
作者
Turc, Guillaume [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Calvet, David [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Guerin, Patrice [5 ,6 ]
Sroussi, Marjorie [2 ,7 ]
Chatellier, Gilles [2 ,8 ,9 ]
Mas, Jean-Louis [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Hop St Anne, Dept Neurol, Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris 05, Sorbonne Paris Cite, Paris, France
[3] INSERM U894, Paris, France
[4] DHU Neurovasc, Paris, France
[5] Inst Thorax, Dept Cardiol, INSERM UMR 915, Nantes, France
[6] CHU Nantes, Inst Thorax, Nantes, France
[7] Cochin Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Paris, France
[8] Georges Pompidou European Hosp, AP HP, Epidemiol & Clin Res Unit, Paris, France
[9] INSERM CIC 1418, Paris, France
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | 2018年 / 7卷 / 12期
关键词
anticoagulation; patent foramen ovale; patent foramen ovale closure; stroke; TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACK; MEDICAL THERAPY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1161/JAHA.117.008356
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure, anticoagulation, and antiplatelet therapy to prevent stroke recurrence in patients with PFO-associated cryptogenic stroke. Methods and Results-We searched Medline, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE through March 2018. The primary outcome was stroke recurrence. Pooled incidences, hazard ratios, and risk ratios (RRs) were calculated in random-effects meta-analyses. PFO closure was associated with a lower risk of recurrent stroke compared with antithrombotic therapy (antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulation: 3560 patients from 6 RCTs; RR=0.36, 95% CI: 0.17-0.79; I-2=59%). The effect of PFO closure on stroke recurrence was larger in patients with atrial septal aneurysm or large shunt (RR=0.27, 95% CI, 0.11-0.70; I-2=42%) compared with patients without these anatomical features (RR=0.80, 95% CI, 0.43-1.47; I-2=12%). Major complications occurred in 2.40% (95% CI, 1.03-4.25; I-2=77%) of procedures. New-onset atrial fibrillation was more frequent in patients randomized to PFO closure versus antithrombotic therapy (RR=4.33, 95% CI, 2.37-7.89; I-2=14%). One RCT compared PFO closure versus anticoagulation (353 patients; hazard ratio=0.14, 95% CI, 0.00-1.45) and 2 RCTs compared PFO closure versus antiplatelet therapy (1137 patients; hazard ratio=0.18, 95% CI, 0.05-0.63; I-2=12%). Three RCTs compared anticoagulation versus antiplatelet therapy, with none showing a significant difference. Conclusions-PFO closure is superior to antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke recurrence after cryptogenic stroke. The annual absolute risk reduction of stroke was low, but it has to be tempered by a substantial time at risk (at least 5 years) in young and middle-aged patients. PFO closure was associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation.
引用
收藏
页数:37
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patent Foramen Ovale and Cryptogenic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: To Close or Not to Close? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lattanzi, Simona
    Brigo, Francesco
    Cagnetti, Claudia
    Di Napoli, Mario
    Silvestrini, Mauro
    CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2018, 45 (5-6) : 193 - 203
  • [22] Patent Foramen Ovale Closure for Secondary Prevention of Cryptogenic Stroke: Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Vaduganathan, Muthiah
    Qamar, Arman
    Gupta, Ankur
    Bajaj, Navkaranbir
    Golwala, Harsh B.
    Pandey, Ambarish
    Bhatt, Deepak L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 131 (05) : 575 - 577
  • [23] Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale versus Medical Therapy After Cryptogenic Stroke: Meta Analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials
    Nasir, Usama
    Qureshi, Waqas T.
    Shabbir, Omer
    Dutta, Abhishek
    Al-Mallah, Mouaz
    CIRCULATION, 2017, 136
  • [24] Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale following cryptogenic stroke: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Riaz, Haris
    Khan, Muhammad Shahzeb
    Schenone, Aldo L.
    Waheed, Anam A.
    Khan, Arooj Razzak
    Krasuski, Richard A.
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 199 : 44 - 50
  • [25] Device Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale Versus Medical Therapy in Cryptogenic Stroke A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Khan, Abdur R.
    Bin Abdulhak, Aref A.
    Sheikh, Mujeeb A.
    Khan, Sobia
    Erwin, Patricia J.
    Tleyjeh, Imad
    Khuder, Sadik
    Eltahawy, Ehab A.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2013, 6 (12) : 1316 - 1323
  • [26] Transcatheter Patent Foramen Ovale Closure After Cryptogenic Stroke An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
    Mojadidi, Mohammad Khalid
    Elgendy, Akram Y.
    Elgendy, Islam Y.
    Mahmoud, Ahmed N.
    Elbadawi, Ayman
    Eshtehardi, Parham
    Patel, Nimesh K.
    Wayangankar, Siddharth
    Tobis, Jonathan M.
    Meier, Bernhard
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 10 (21) : 2228 - 2230
  • [27] Recurrence Risk in Patients with Cryptogenic Stroke, Patent Foramen Ovale, and Thrombophilia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Hviid, Claus V. B.
    Simonsen, Claus Ziegler
    Hvas, Anne-Mette
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2019, 119 (11) : 1839 - 1848
  • [28] Patent foramen ovale closure or medical therapy for cryptogenic ischemic stroke: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Schulze, Volker
    Lin, Yingfeng
    Karathanos, Athanasios
    Brockmeyer, Maximilian
    Zeus, Tobias
    Polzin, Amin
    Perings, Stefan
    Kelm, Malte
    Wolff, Georg
    CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 107 (09) : 745 - 755
  • [29] Percutaneous Closure versus Medical Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke in Patients With a Patent Foramen Ovale: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Pickett, Christopher
    Villines, Todd
    Ferguson, Michael
    Hulten, Edward
    CIRCULATION, 2013, 128 (22)
  • [30] Patent foramen ovale closure or medical therapy for secondary prevention of cryptogenic stroke An update meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Ma, Yingxu
    Li, Dongping
    Bai, Fan
    Qin, Fen
    Li, Jiayi
    Li, Yixi
    Liu, Na
    Xie, Hui
    Zhou, Shenghua
    Liu, Qiming
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (34)