Who Is the Most Vulnerable to Anxiety at the Beginning of the COVID-19 Outbreak in China? A Cross-Sectional Nationwide Survey

被引:4
作者
Liu, Bei
Han, Bingfeng
Zheng, Hui
Liu, Hanyu
Zhao, Tianshuo
Wan, Yongmei
Cui, Fuqiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Laboratorial Sci & Technol, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
关键词
COVID-19; anxiety scores; population; psychosocial; China; ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROME; RISK PERCEPTION; BEHAVIORAL-RESPONSES; SARS EPIDEMIC; HONG-KONG; EXPOSURE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/healthcare9080970
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
(1) Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has not only changed people's health behavior, but also induced a psychological reaction among the public. Research data is needed to develop scientific evidence-driven strategies to reduce adverse mental health effects. The aims of this study are to evaluate the anxiety reaction of Chinese people and the related determinants during the earliest phase of the COVID-19 outbreak in China. Evidence from this survey will contribute to a targeted reference on how to deliver psychological counseling service in the face of outbreaks. (2) Methods: A cross-sectional, population-based online survey was conducted from 28 January to 5 February 2020 using an open online questionnaire for people aged 18 years or above, residing in China and abroad. The socio-demographic information of the respondents was collected, and anxiety scores were calculated. A direct standardization method was used to standardize anxiety scores and a general linear model was used to identify associations between some factors (e.g., sex, age, education, etc.) and anxiety scores. (3) Results: A total of 10,946 eligible participants were recruited in this study, with a completion rate of 98.16% (10,946/11,151). The average anxiety score was 6.46 +/- 4.12 (total score = 15); women (6.86 +/- 4.11) scored higher than men (5.67 +/- 4.04). The age variable was inversely and significantly associated with the anxiety score (beta = -2.12, 95% CI: -2.47--1.78). People possessing higher education (beta = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.88-1.41) or a higher awareness of cognitive risk (beta = 4.89, 95% CI: 4.33-5.46) reported higher levels of anxiety. There was a close association between poor subjective health and anxiety status (beta = 2.83, 95% CI: 2.58-3.09). With the increase of confidence, the anxiety of the population exhibited a gradual decline (beta = -2.45, 95% CI: -2.77--2.13). (4) Conclusion: Most people were vulnerable to anxiety during the earliest phase of the COVID-19 outbreak in China. Younger women, individuals with high education, people with high cognitive risk and subjective poor health were vulnerable to anxiety during the epidemic. In addition, increasing confidence in resisting this pandemic is a protective determinant for individuals to develop anxiety. The findings suggest that policymakers adopt psychosocial interventions to reduce anxiety during the pandemic.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] Risk perception and behavioral change during epidemics: Comparing models of individual and collective learning
    Abdulkareem, Shaheen A.
    Augustijn, Ellen-Wien
    Filatova, Tatiana
    Musial, Katarzyna
    Mustafa, Yaseen T.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (01):
  • [2] Epidemic of COVID-19 in China and associated Psychological Problems
    Ahmed, Md Zahir
    Ahmed, Oli
    Aibao, Zhou
    Hanbin, Sang
    Siyu, Liu
    Ahmad, Akbaruddin
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 51
  • [3] Coronaphobia: Fear and the 2019-nCoV outbreak
    Asmundson, Gordon J. G.
    Taylor, Steven
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2020, 70
  • [4] A Social Media Based Index of Mental Well-Being in College Campuses
    Bagroy, Shrey
    Kumaraguru, Ponnurangam
    De Choudhury, Munmun
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 ACM SIGCHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI'17), 2017, : 1634 - 1646
  • [5] Measured voluntary avoidance behaviour during the 2009 A/H1N1 epidemic
    Bayham, Jude
    Kuminoff, Nicolai V.
    Gunn, Quentin
    Fenichel, Eli P.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 282 (1818)
  • [6] Psychological Predictors of Health Anxiety in Response to the Zika Virus
    Blakey, Shannon M.
    Abramowitz, Jonathan S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY IN MEDICAL SETTINGS, 2017, 24 (3-4) : 270 - 278
  • [7] The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence
    Brooks, Samantha K.
    Webster, Rebecca K.
    Smith, Louise E.
    Woodland, Lisa
    Wessely, Simon
    Greenberg, Neil
    Rubin, Gideon James
    [J]. LANCET, 2020, 395 (10227) : 912 - 920
  • [8] SARS risk perception, knowledge, precautions, and information sources, the Netherlands
    Brug, J
    Aro, AR
    Oenema, A
    de Zwart, O
    Richardus, JH
    Bishop, GD
    [J]. EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 10 (08) : 1486 - 1489
  • [9] Bults M, 2010, PSYCHOL HEALTH, V25, P121
  • [10] The Commerce and Crossover of Resources: Resource Conservation in the Service of Resilience
    Chen, Shoshi
    Westman, Mina
    Hobfoll, Stevan E.
    [J]. STRESS AND HEALTH, 2015, 31 (02) : 95 - 105