Acceptability of COVID-19 Certificates: A Qualitative Study in Geneva, Switzerland, in 2020

被引:5
作者
Fargnoli, Vanessa [1 ]
Nehme, Mayssam [2 ]
Guessous, Idris [3 ]
Burton-Jeangros, Claudine [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Geneva, Inst Sociol Res, Geneva Sch Social Sci, Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Geneva Univ Hosp, Div & Dept Primary Care Med, Geneva, Switzerland
[3] Univ Geneva, Fac Med, Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
immunity certificates; COVID-19; anti-SARS-CoV-2; serology; social acceptability; qualitative study; public health policy;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2021.682365
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Immunity certificates related to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been under discussion since the beginning of the pandemic with conflicting opinions. In order to identify arguments in favor of and against the possible implementation of documents certifying immunity of an individual based on serological testing, we developed a qualitative study in Geneva, Switzerland. The study took place between two lockdowns with a sense of semi-normalcy during summer 2020 in Switzerland but at a time when no vaccine was available and seroprevalence was below 21%. Eleven focus groups with members of the public and 14 semi-structured interviews with stakeholders were conducted between July and November 2020, with a total of 68 participants with an age range between 24 and 77 years. Interviews and focus groups transcripts were coded with the ATLAS.ti CAQDAS. Few participants considered immunity certificates based on serological testing as an acceptable public health measure. Major concerns included the reliability of scientific data related to COVID-19 immunity and serological testing potential re-infection as well as the possibility that the use of certificates could result in deleterious outcomes. Discrimination, counterfeiting, incitement for self-infection, invasion of the private sphere, violation of personal integrity, and violation of medical secrecy were perceived as the major risks. Benefits of immunity certificates were more perceived when in relation to vaccination, and included gains in medical knowledge and protection in certain contexts involving leisure or work-related activities. The consequences of implementing immunity certificates are numerous, and the acceptability by the general population has to be considered when engaging in such policy. Even if the results provide a snapshot of arguments discussed around immunity certificates based on serological testing before the implementation of the COVID-19 vaccine, most of the issues discussed are central in the current debates about vaccination certificates.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [11] Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in Geneva, Switzerland (SEROCoV-POP): a population-based study
    Stringhini, Silvia
    Wisniak, Ania
    Piumatti, Giovanni
    Azman, Andrew S.
    Lauer, Stephen A.
    Baysson, Helene
    De Ridder, David
    Petrovic, Dusan
    Schrempft, Stephanie
    Marcus, Kailing
    Yerly, Sabine
    Vernez, Isabelle Arm
    Keiser, Olivia
    Hurst, Samia
    Posfay-Barbe, Klara M.
    Trono, Didier
    Pittet, Didier
    Getaz, Laurent
    Chappuis, Francois
    Eckerle, Isabella
    Vuilleumier, Nicolas
    Meyer, Benjamin
    Flahault, Antoine
    Kaiser, Laurent
    Guessous, Idris
    [J]. LANCET, 2020, 396 (10247) : 313 - 319
  • [12] Unhealthy geopolitics: can the response to COVID-19 reform climate change policy?
    Voo, Teck Chuan
    Reis, Andreas A.
    Thome, Beatriz
    Ho, Calvin W. L.
    Tam, Clarence C.
    Kelly-Cirino, Cassandra
    Emanuel, Ezekiel
    Beca, Juan P.
    Littler, Katherine
    Smith, Maxwell J.
    Parker, Michael
    Kass, Nancy
    Gobat, Nina
    Lei, Ruipeng
    Upshur, Ross
    Hurst, Samia
    Munsaka, Sody
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2021, 99 (02) : 155 - 161
  • [13] WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2020, WHOEURO2020116040906
  • [14] Incentivizing Vaccination Uptake The "Green Pass" Proposal in Israel
    Wilf-Miron, Rachel
    Myers, Vicki
    Saban, Mor
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2021, 325 (15): : 1503 - 1504