Trade-offs and synergies associated with maize leaf stripping within crop-livestock systems in northern Ghana

被引:6
作者
Komarek, Adam M. [1 ,2 ]
Rahman, Nurudeen Abdul [3 ]
Bandyopadhyay, Arkadeep [1 ]
Kizito, Fred [3 ,4 ]
Koo, Jawoo [1 ]
Addah, Weseh [5 ]
机构
[1] Int Food Policy Res Inst, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Agr & Food Sci, Gatton, Qld 4343, Australia
[3] Int Inst Trop Agr IITA, POB TL 06, Tamale 03720, Ghana
[4] Alliance Biovers & Int Ctr Trop Agr CIAT, Nairobi 82300621, Kenya
[5] Univ Dev Studies, Fac Agr, Anim Sci Dept, POB TL 1882, Tamale, Ghana
关键词
Ghana; Labour; Leaf stripping; Maize; Sheep; Sustainable intensification; CONSTRAINTS; DEFOLIATION; INNOVATION; DIVERSITY; SAVANNA; RISK; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103206
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
CONTEXT: The accessibility and availability of forages is a common concern in crop-livestock systems in West Africa; however, options to increase forage production may entail trade-offs within the farm system that can be challenging to quantify explicitly. OBJECTIVE: This study examined how maize (Zea mays L.) leaf stripping affected maize and sheep productivity and associated labour requirements, and farm system trade-offs and synergies in four communities in the Northern Region of Ghana. METHODS: Maize leaf stripping involved removing almost senesced leaves from maize plants below the cob level at silking. We combined data from three sources: on-farm maize trials with 28 farmers from two seasons (2017 and 2018), on-farm sheep feeding trials where the pasture-based diets of weaner sheep were supplemented with stripped maize leaves fed in pens (conducted in 2019), and farm survey data from 117 households (conducted in 2014), seven of which were in the on-farm maize trials and owned sheep. We examined the trial data using linear mixed-effects models. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Maize leaf stripping had no significant effect on maize grain yield but had a significant positive effect on maize forage protein yield from leaf and stover. Offering maize leaves to weaner sheep had a significant positive effect on average daily liveweight gain, estimated marginal mean was 29.3 g with maize leaves and -10.9 g without maize leaves. For the maize-sheep systems of the seven households, noninferential statistics suggested that on average maize leaf stripping reduced total maize grain production by 12% (range -46 to 38) and increased maize forage protein production from leaf and stover by 90% (range -16 to 298). Stripping the maize leaves from one hectare of land took an extra 34 h (range 27 to 42) of labour, which was counterbalanced by reduced labour time for grazing as sheep were fed the maize leaves in pens. For the 117 farmers, heterogeneity in maize areas planted and livestock numbers resulted in heterogeneous production and labour effects of maize leaf stripping. Farmers qualitatively described how maize leaf stripping released labour so children could spend more time at school rather than shepherding. SIGNIFICANCE: We quantified in northern Ghana how maize leaf stripping altered crop and livestock productivity and associated trade-offs and synergies in the farm system, including labour. Changes in crop management often have implications beyond the crop's field and examining these implications can provide insights into the suitability of alternative farm management options.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] Adams F, 2015, THESIS FACULTY AGR K
  • [2] Adu GB, 2014, RECOMMENDED PRODUCTI, DOI [10.13140/2.1.4376.3527, DOI 10.13140/2.1.4376.3527]
  • [3] Diagnosing constraints to market participation of small ruminant producers in northern Ghana: An innovation systems analysis
    Amankwah, K.
    Klerkx, L.
    Oosting, S. J.
    Sakyi-Dawson, O.
    van der Zijpp, A. J.
    Millar, D.
    [J]. NJAS-WAGENINGEN JOURNAL OF LIFE SCIENCES, 2012, 60-63 : 37 - 47
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2006, World Soil Resources Reports. Vol, V103
  • [5] Precision farming for increased land and labour productivity in semi-arid West Africa. A review
    Aune, Jens B.
    Coulibaly, Adama
    Giller, Ken E.
    [J]. AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 37 (03)
  • [6] Awunyo-Vitor D., 2016, Agriculture Food Security, V5, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1186/S40066-016-0076-2, 10.1186/s40066-016-0076-2]
  • [7] Improving adoption of technologies and interventions for increasing supply of quality livestock feed in low- and middle-income countries
    Balehegn, Mulubrhan
    Duncan, Alan
    Tolera, Adugna
    Ayantunde, Augustine A.
    Issa, Salissou
    Karimou, Moctar
    Zampaligre, Nouhoun
    Andre, Kiema
    Gnanda, Isidore
    Varijakshapanicker, Padmakumar
    Kebreab, Ermias
    Dubeux, Jose
    Boote, Kenneth
    Minta, Muluneh
    Feyissa, Fekede
    Adesogan, Adegbola T.
    [J]. GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY-AGRICULTURE POLICY ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 26
  • [8] Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
    Bates, Douglas
    Maechler, Martin
    Bolker, Benjamin M.
    Walker, Steven C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01): : 1 - 48
  • [9] Feeding, crop residue and manure management for integrated soil fertility management - A case study from Kenya
    Castellanos-Navarrete, A.
    Tittonell, P.
    Rufino, M. C.
    Giller, K. E.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2015, 134 : 24 - 35
  • [10] Yield and labor relations of sustainable intensification options for smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. A meta-analysis
    Dahlin, A. Sigrun
    Rusinamhodzi, Leonard
    [J]. AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 39 (03)