Corporate identity orientation and disorientation: A complexity theory perspective

被引:21
作者
Devereux, Luke [1 ]
Melewar, T. C. [1 ]
Dinnie, Keith [2 ]
Lange, Thomas [3 ]
机构
[1] Middlesex Univ London, London, England
[2] Univ Dundee, Dundee, Scotland
[3] Australian Catholic Univ, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Corporate identity; Complexity theory; Strategic orientation; Corporate identity orientation; Corporate identity disorientation; ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTITY; STRATEGIC ORIENTATIONS; MARKET ORIENTATION; ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS; SOCIAL IDENTITY; MANAGEMENT; AMBIDEXTERITY; ANTECEDENTS; AMBIGUITY; IMAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.048
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The importance of corporate identity to organizations is increasing, which has led to the conceptualisation of corporate identity orientation. This paper challenges existing thinking by suggesting that if corporate identity orientation exists, so could corporate identity disorientation. Using a complexity theory perspective this conceptual paper explores how orientation/disorientation could emerge, and how the two could be related. The paper concludes that a combination of orientation and disorientation could be beneficial for corporate identity development, and that disorientation need not be wholly negative. This is relevant because the environment organizations find themselves in increasingly causes identity disorientation, so exploring this further helps address this crucial issue. As such, this paper opens new directions for researchers to look at corporate identity development, and also for practitioners to embrace elements of disorientation and how it may help unlock new opportunities.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 424
页数:12
相关论文
共 152 条
  • [1] The Double Edge of Ambiguity in Strategic Planning
    Abdallah, Chahrazad
    Langley, Ann
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2014, 51 (02) : 235 - 264
  • [2] Abratt R., 1989, Journal of Marketing Management, V5, P63
  • [3] Corporate identity, corporate branding and corporate reputations Reconciliation and integration
    Abratt, Russell
    Kleyn, Nicola
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2012, 46 (7-8) : 1048 - 1063
  • [4] Albert Stuart., 1985, RES ORGAN BEHAV, V7, P263
  • [5] Allen PM, 2010, ISSUES BUS ETHICS, V26, P41, DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-9187-1_3
  • [6] Complexity theory and organization science
    Anderson, P
    [J]. ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (03) : 216 - 232
  • [7] Case study research: The view from complexity science
    Anderson, RA
    Crabtree, BE
    Steele, DJ
    McDaniel, RR
    [J]. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2005, 15 (05) : 669 - 685
  • [8] [Anonymous], DUALITIES PARADIGM H
  • [9] [Anonymous], DIFFERENCE IDENTITY
  • [10] [Anonymous], INT J MANAGEMENT RES