Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance and Drug Usage in the Human and Livestock Sector and Foodborne Antimicrobial Resistance in Six European Countries

被引:34
|
作者
Varona, Octavio Mesa [1 ]
Chaintarli, Katerina [2 ]
Muller-Pebody, Berit [3 ]
Anjum, Muna F. [2 ]
Eckmanns, Tim [4 ]
Norstrom, Madelaine [5 ]
Boone, Ides [4 ]
Tenhagen, Bernd-Alois [1 ]
机构
[1] German Fed Inst Risk Assessment BfR, Dept Biol Safety, Berlin, Germany
[2] Anim & Plant Hlth Agcy, Dept Bacteriol, Addlestone, Surrey, England
[3] Publ Hlth England, Healthcare Associated Infect & Antimicrobial Resi, Natl Infect Serv, London, England
[4] Robert Koch Inst, Dept Infect Dis Epidemiol, Berlin, Germany
[5] Norwegian Vet Inst, Dept Anal & Diagnost, Sect Epidemiol, Oslo, Norway
来源
INFECTION AND DRUG RESISTANCE | 2020年 / 13卷
关键词
AMR; AMU; food-producing animals; harmonization; monitoring; surveillance; SURVEILLANCE;
D O I
10.2147/IDR.S237038
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Introduction: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR), associated with antimicrobial use (AMU), is a major public concern. Surveillance and monitoring systems are essential to assess and control the trends in AMU and AMR. However, differences in the surveillance and monitoring systems between countries and sectors make comparisons challenging. The purpose of this article is to describe all surveillance and monitoring systems for AMU and AMR in the human and livestock sectors, as well as national surveillance and monitoring systems for AMR in food, in six European countries (Spain, Germany, France, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Norway) as a baseline for developing suggestions to overcome current limitations in comparing AMU and AMR data. Methods: A literature search in 2018 was performed to identify relevant peer-reviewed articles and national and European grey reports as well as AMU/AMR databases. Results: Comparison of AMU and AMR systems across the six countries showed a lack of standardization and harmonization with different AMU data sources (prescription vs sales data) and units of AMU and AMR being used. The AMR data varied by sample type (clinical/non-clinical), laboratory method (disk diffusion, microdilution, and VITEK, among others), data type, ie quantitative (minimum inhibition concentration (MIC) in mg/ L/inhibition zone (IZ) in mm) vs qualitative data (susceptible-intermediate-resistant (SIR)), the standards used (EUCAST/CLSI among others), and/or the evaluation criteria adopted (epidemiological or clinical). Discussion: A One Health approach for AMU and AMR requires harmonization in various aspects between human, animal and food systems at national and international levels. Additionally, some overlap between systems of AMU and AMR has been encountered. Efforts should be made to improve standardization and harmonization and allow more meaningful analyses of AMR and AMU surveillance data under a One Health approach.
引用
收藏
页码:957 / 993
页数:37
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Perspectives on Antimicrobial Resistance in Livestock and Livestock Products in ASEAN Countries
    Archawakulathep, Amornthep
    Kim, Chung Ta Thi
    Meunsene, Dethaloun
    Handijatno, Didik
    Abu Hassim, Hasliza
    Rovira, Hope R. G.
    Myint, Khin Sandar
    Baldrias, Loinda R.
    Sothy, Meas
    Aung, Min
    Wahyu, Nenny H.
    Chea, Rortana
    Boonmasawai, Sookruetai
    Vannamahaxay, Soulasack
    Angkititrakul, Sunpetch
    Collantes, Therese M. A.
    Tho Nguyen Van
    Punyapornwithaya, Veerasak
    Zakaria, Zunita
    Chuanchuen, Rungtip
    THAI JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2014, 44 (01): : 5 - 13
  • [2] Antimicrobial resistance in livestock
    Catry, B
    Laevens, H
    Devriese, LA
    Opsomer, G
    Kruif, A
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2003, 26 (02) : 81 - 93
  • [3] Harmonisation of monitoring zoonoses, antimicrobial resistance and foodborne outbreaks
    Makela, Pia
    Beloeil, Pierre-Alexandre
    Rizzi, Valentina
    Boelaert, Frank
    Deluyker, Hubert
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2012, 10 (10)
  • [4] Antimicrobial resistance of foodborne pathogens
    White, DG
    Zhao, SH
    Simjee, S
    Wagner, DD
    McDermott, PF
    MICROBES AND INFECTION, 2002, 4 (04) : 405 - 412
  • [5] Antimicrobial Usage and -Resistance in Livestock: Where Should We Focus?
    Magouras, Ioannis
    Carmo, Luis P.
    Stark, Katharina D. C.
    Schupbach-Regula, Gertraud
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2017, 4
  • [6] Evaluation of Antimicrobial Usage Supply Chain and Monitoring in the Livestock and Poultry Sector of Pakistan
    Tahir, Muhammad Farooq
    Ullah, Riasat Wasee
    Wang, Jing
    Dukpa, Kinzang
    Zaheer, Muhammad Usman
    Bahadur, Sami Ullah Khan
    Talib, Usman
    Alam, Javaria
    Akram, Muhammad
    Salman, Mo
    Irshad, Hamid
    VETERINARY SCIENCES, 2025, 12 (03)
  • [7] A longitudinal study reveals persistence of antimicrobial resistance on livestock farms is not due to antimicrobial usage alone
    Smith, Richard. P. P.
    May, Hannah. E. E.
    AbuOun, Manal
    Stubberfield, Emma
    Gilson, Daniel
    Chau, Kevin. K. K.
    Crook, Derrick. W. W.
    Shaw, Liam. P. P.
    Read, Daniel. S. S.
    Stoesser, Nicole
    Vilar, Maria Jose
    Anjum, Muna. F. F.
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [8] Effects of antimicrobial usage on the development of antimicrobial resistance
    Butaye, Patrick
    VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2013, 198 (02): : 307 - 308
  • [9] Combating Antimicrobial Resistance in Foodborne Microorganisms
    Lai, Edward P. C.
    Iqbal, Zafar
    Avis, Tyler J.
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2016, 79 (02) : 321 - 336
  • [10] Foodborne Pathogenic Vibrios: Antimicrobial Resistance
    Dutta, Dipanjan
    Kaushik, Anupam
    Kumar, Dhirendra
    Bag, Satyabrata
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 12