What makes a word so attractive? Disclosing the urge to read while bisecting

被引:0
作者
Girelli, Luisa [1 ,2 ]
Previtali, Paola [1 ]
Arduino, Lisa S. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Psychol, Piazza Ateneo Nuovo,1 U6, I-20126 Milan, Italy
[2] Milan Ctr Neurosci, NeuroMi, Milan, Italy
[3] LUMSA Univ, Dept Human Sci, Rome, Italy
[4] CNR, Inst Cognit Sci & Technol ISTC, Rome, Italy
关键词
pseudoneglect; reading habits; spatial bias; word bisection; LINE BISECTION; LANDING POSITION; RECOGNITION; NEGLECT; REPRESENTATION; DIRECTION; MODEL; PSEUDONEGLECT; HABITS; LENGTH;
D O I
10.1111/bjop.12303
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Expert readers have been repeatedly reported to misperceive the centre of visual stimuli, shifting systematically to the left the bisection of any lines (pseudoneglect) while showing a cross-over effect while bisecting different types of orthographic strings (Arduino etal., 2010, Neuropsychologia, 48, 2140). This difference has been attributed to asymmetrical allocation of attention that visuo-verbal material receives when lexical access occurs (e.g., Fischer, 2004, Cognitive Brain Research, 4, 163). The aim of this study was to further examine which visual features guide recognition of potentially orthographic materials. To disentangle the role of orthography, heterogeneity, and visuo-perceptual discreteness, we presented Italian unimpaired adults with four experiments exploiting the bisection paradigm. The results showed that a cross-over effect emerges in most discrete strings, especially when their internal structure, that is being composed of heterogeneous elements, is suggestive of orthographically relevant material. Interestingly, the cross-over effect systematically characterized the processing of letter strings (Experiment 2) and words (Experiments 3 and 4), whether visually discrete or not. Overall, this pattern of results suggests that neither discreteness nor heterogeneity per se are responsible for activating visual scanning mechanisms implied in text exploration, although both contribute to increasing the chance of a visual stimulus undergoing a perceptual analysis dedicated to pre-lexical processing.
引用
收藏
页码:862 / 878
页数:17
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   The centre is not in the middle: Evidence from line and word bisection [J].
Arduino, Lisa S. ;
Previtali, Paola ;
Girelli, Luisa .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2010, 48 (07) :2140-2146
[2]   Growth in Phonological, Orthographic, and Morphological Awareness in Grades 1 to 6 [J].
Berninger, Virginia W. ;
Abbott, Robert D. ;
Nagy, William ;
Carlisle, Joanne .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 2010, 39 (02) :141-163
[3]  
Bertinetto P.M., 2005, Corpus e Lessico di frequenza dell'Italiano Scritto (CoLFIS)
[4]   PSEUDONEGLECT - EFFECTS OF HEMISPACE ON A TACTILE LINE BISECTION TASK [J].
BOWERS, D ;
HEILMAN, KM .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1980, 18 (4-5) :491-498
[5]   Constraints on letter-in-string identification in peripheral vision: effects of number of flankers and deployment of attention [J].
Chanceaux, Myriam ;
Grainger, Jonathan .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 4
[6]   Scanning direction and line bisection: a study of normal subjects and unilateral neglect patients with opposite reading habits [J].
Chokron, S ;
Bartolomeo, P ;
Perenin, MT ;
Helft, G ;
Imbert, M .
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 1998, 7 (02) :173-178
[7]   INFLUENCE OF READING HABITS ON LINE BISECTION [J].
CHOKRON, S ;
IMBERT, M .
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 1993, 1 (04) :219-222
[8]   Brain activity during landmark and line bisection tasks [J].
Cicek, Metehan ;
Deouell, Leon Y. ;
Knight, Robert T. .
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 3
[9]   The neural code for written words: a proposal [J].
Dehaene, S ;
Cohen, L ;
Sigman, M ;
Vinckier, F .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2005, 9 (07) :335-341
[10]   What determines the eyes' landing position in words? [J].
Ducrot, S ;
Pynte, J .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2002, 64 (07) :1130-1144