A machine learning model to precisely immunohistochemically classify pituitary adenoma subtypes with radiomics based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging

被引:36
|
作者
Peng, AiJun [1 ]
Dai, HuMing [2 ]
Duan, HaiHan [2 ]
Chen, YaXing [1 ]
Huang, JianHan [1 ]
Zhou, LiangXue [1 ]
Chen, LiangYin [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Coll Comp Sci, Chengdu 610065, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, Inst Ind Internet Res, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Pituitary adenomas; Pituitary transcription factor; Radiomics support vector machine; CLASSIFICATION; PREVALENCE; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108892
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The type of pituitary adenoma (PA) cannot be clearly recognized with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) but can be classified with immunohistochemical staining after surgery. In this study, a model to precisely immunohistochemically classify the PA subtypes by radiomic features based on preoperative MR images was developed. Methods: Two hundred thirty-five pathologically diagnosed PAs, including t-box pituitary transcription factor (Tpit) family tumors (n = 55), pituitary transcription factor 1 (Pit-1) family tumors (n = 110), and steroidogenic factor 1 (SF-1) family tumors (n = 70), were retrospectively studied. T1-weighted, T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images were obtained from all patients. Through imaging acquisition, feature extraction and radiomic data processing, 18 radiomic features were used to train support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (KNN) and Naive Bayes (NBs) models. Ten-fold cross-validation was applied to evaluate the performance of these models. Results: The SVM model showed high performance (balanced accuracy 0.89, AUC 0.9549) whereas the KNN (balanced accuracy 0.83, AUC 0.9266) and NBs (balanced accuracy 0.80, AUC 0.9324) models displayed low performance based on the T2-weighted images. The performance of the T2-weighted images was better than that of the other two MR sequences. Additionally, significant sensitivity (P = 0.031) and specificity (P = 0.012) differences were observed when classifying the PA subtypes by T2-weighted images. Conclusions: The SVM model was superior to the KNN and NBs models and can potentially precisely immunohistochemically classify PA subtypes with an MR-based radiomic analysis. The developed model exhibited good performance using T2-weighted images and might offer potential guidance to neurosurgeons in clinical decision-making before surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Machine Learning and Radiomics Analysis for Tumor Budding Prediction in Colorectal Liver Metastases Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment
    Granata, Vincenza
    Fusco, Roberta
    Brunese, Maria Chiara
    Ferrara, Gerardo
    Tatangelo, Fabiana
    Ottaiano, Alessandro
    Avallone, Antonio
    Miele, Vittorio
    Normanno, Nicola
    Izzo, Francesco
    Petrillo, Antonella
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (02)
  • [22] A Radiomics Model for the Differentiation of Intracranial Solitary Fibrous Tumor/Hemangiopericytoma and Meningioma Based on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Xiong, Hua
    Yin, Ping
    Luo, Weiqiang
    Li, Yihui
    Wang, Sicong
    NEUROLOGY INDIA, 2024, 72 (04) : 779 - 783
  • [23] The Diagnostic Value of Radiomics-Based Machine Learning in Predicting the Grade of Meningiomas Using Conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Preliminary Study
    Chen, Chaoyue
    Guo, Xinyi
    Wang, Jian
    Guo, Wen
    Ma, Xuelei
    Xu, Jianguo
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2019, 9
  • [24] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Machine Learning Model in Classifying Jaw Lesions: A Preliminary Study
    Muraoka, Hirotaka
    Kaneda, Takashi
    Ito, Kotaro
    Otsuka, Kohei
    Tokunaga, Satoshi
    ORAL SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2025, 22 (02)
  • [25] Brain disease research based on functional magnetic resonance imaging data and machine learning: a review
    Teng, Jing
    Mi, Chunlin
    Shi, Jian
    Li, Na
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 17
  • [26] Machine-Learning-Based Radiomics for Classifying Glioma Grade from Magnetic Resonance Images of the Brain
    Kumar, Anuj
    Jha, Ashish Kumar
    Agarwal, Jai Prakash
    Yadav, Manender
    Badhe, Suvarna
    Sahay, Ayushi
    Epari, Sridhar
    Sahu, Arpita
    Bhattacharya, Kajari
    Chatterjee, Abhishek
    Ganeshan, Balaji
    Rangarajan, Venkatesh
    Moyiadi, Aliasgar
    Gupta, Tejpal
    Goda, Jayant S.
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2023, 13 (06):
  • [27] Radiomics-based machine learning model for efficiently classifying transcriptome subtypes in glioblastoma patients from MRI
    Le, Nguyen Quoc Khanh
    Hung, Truong Nguyen Khanh
    Do, Duyen Thi
    Lam, Luu Ho Thanh
    Dang, Luong Huu
    Huynh, Tuan-Tu
    COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2021, 132
  • [28] Prediction of High-Risk Cytogenetic Status in Multiple Myeloma Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Utility of Radiomics and Comparison of Machine Learning Methods
    Liu, Jianfang
    Zeng, Piaoe
    Guo, Wei
    Wang, Chunjie
    Geng, Yayuan
    Lang, Ning
    Yuan, Huishu
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2021, 54 (04) : 1303 - 1311
  • [29] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Peritumoral Radiomics for Preoperative Prediction of the Presence of Extracapsular Extension With Prostate Cancer
    Bai, Honglin
    Xia, Wei
    Ji, Xuefu
    He, Dong
    Zhao, Xingyu
    Bao, Jie
    Zhou, Jian
    Wei, Xuedong
    Huang, Yuhua
    Li, Qiong
    Gao, Xin
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2021, 54 (04) : 1222 - 1230
  • [30] Discrimination between non-functioning pituitary adenomas and hypophysitis using machine learning methods based on magnetic resonance imaging-derived texture features
    Sahin, Serdar
    Yildiz, Gokcen
    Oguz, Seda Hanife
    Civan, Orkun
    Cicek, Ebru
    Durcan, Emre
    Comunoglu, Nil
    Ozkaya, Hande Mefkure
    Oz, Aysim Buge
    Soylemezoglu, Figen
    Oguz, Kader Karli
    Dagdelen, Selcuk
    Erbas, Tomris
    Kizilkilic, Osman
    Kadioglu, Pinar
    PITUITARY, 2022, 25 (03) : 474 - 479