A machine learning model to precisely immunohistochemically classify pituitary adenoma subtypes with radiomics based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging

被引:36
|
作者
Peng, AiJun [1 ]
Dai, HuMing [2 ]
Duan, HaiHan [2 ]
Chen, YaXing [1 ]
Huang, JianHan [1 ]
Zhou, LiangXue [1 ]
Chen, LiangYin [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Coll Comp Sci, Chengdu 610065, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, Inst Ind Internet Res, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Pituitary adenomas; Pituitary transcription factor; Radiomics support vector machine; CLASSIFICATION; PREVALENCE; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108892
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The type of pituitary adenoma (PA) cannot be clearly recognized with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) but can be classified with immunohistochemical staining after surgery. In this study, a model to precisely immunohistochemically classify the PA subtypes by radiomic features based on preoperative MR images was developed. Methods: Two hundred thirty-five pathologically diagnosed PAs, including t-box pituitary transcription factor (Tpit) family tumors (n = 55), pituitary transcription factor 1 (Pit-1) family tumors (n = 110), and steroidogenic factor 1 (SF-1) family tumors (n = 70), were retrospectively studied. T1-weighted, T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images were obtained from all patients. Through imaging acquisition, feature extraction and radiomic data processing, 18 radiomic features were used to train support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (KNN) and Naive Bayes (NBs) models. Ten-fold cross-validation was applied to evaluate the performance of these models. Results: The SVM model showed high performance (balanced accuracy 0.89, AUC 0.9549) whereas the KNN (balanced accuracy 0.83, AUC 0.9266) and NBs (balanced accuracy 0.80, AUC 0.9324) models displayed low performance based on the T2-weighted images. The performance of the T2-weighted images was better than that of the other two MR sequences. Additionally, significant sensitivity (P = 0.031) and specificity (P = 0.012) differences were observed when classifying the PA subtypes by T2-weighted images. Conclusions: The SVM model was superior to the KNN and NBs models and can potentially precisely immunohistochemically classify PA subtypes with an MR-based radiomic analysis. The developed model exhibited good performance using T2-weighted images and might offer potential guidance to neurosurgeons in clinical decision-making before surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Radiomics based on magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in head and neck cancer: Machine learning study
    Wang, Yuepeng
    Yu, Taihui
    Yang, Zehong
    Zhou, Yuwei
    Kang, Ziqin
    Wang, Yan
    Huang, Zhiquan
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2022, 44 (12): : 2786 - 2795
  • [2] Model Based on Ultrasound Radiomics and Machine Learning to Preoperative Differentiation of Follicular Thyroid Neoplasm
    Deng, Yiwen
    Zeng, Qiao
    Zhao, Yu
    Hu, Zhen
    Zhan, Changmiao
    Guo, Liangyun
    Lai, Binghuang
    Huang, Zhiping
    Fu, Zhiyong
    Zhang, Chunquan
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2025, 44 (03) : 567 - 579
  • [3] Preoperative prediction of cavernous sinus invasion by pituitary adenomas using a radiomics method based on magnetic resonance images
    Niu, Jianxing
    Zhang, Shuaitong
    Ma, Shunchang
    Diao, Jinfu
    Zhou, Wenjianlong
    Tian, Jie
    Zang, Yali
    Jia, Wang
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (03) : 1625 - 1634
  • [4] Radiomics-Based Machine Learning to Predict Recurrence in Glioma Patients Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Hu, Guanjie
    Hu, Xinhua
    Yang, Kun
    Yu, Yun
    Jiang, Zijuan
    Liu, Yong
    Liu, Dongming
    Hu, Xiao
    Xiao, Hong
    Zou, Yuanjie
    You, Yongping
    Liu, Hongyi
    Chen, Jiu
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2023, 47 (01) : 129 - 135
  • [5] Machine Learning Model Based on Radiomics for Preoperative Differentiation of Jaw Cystic Lesions
    Fang, Songling
    Wang, Yuepeng
    He, Yilin
    Yu, Taihui
    Xie, Yutong
    Cai, Yongkang
    Li, Wenhao
    Wang, Yan
    Huang, Zhiquan
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2024, 170 (06) : 1561 - 1569
  • [6] Machine learning-based multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging radiomics model for distinguishing central neurocytoma from glioma of lateral ventricle
    Mo, Haizhu
    Liang, Wen
    Huang, Zhousan
    Li, Xiaodan
    Xiao, Xiang
    Liu, Hao
    He, Jianming
    Xu, Yikai
    Wu, Yuankui
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2023, 33 (06) : 4259 - 4269
  • [7] Predicting Subtype of Growth Hormone Pituitary Adenoma based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics
    Liu, Chen-Xi
    Wang, Sheng-Zhong
    Heng, Li-Jun
    Han, Yu
    Ma, Yu-Hui
    Yan, Lin-Feng
    Yu, Ying
    Wang, Wen
    Hu, Yu-Chuan
    Cui, Guang-Bin
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2022, 46 (01) : 124 - 130
  • [8] Predicting Breast Cancer Subtypes Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Based Radiomics With Automatic Segmentation
    Yue, Wen-Yi
    Zhang, Hong-Tao
    Gao, Shen
    Li, Guang
    Sun, Ze-Yu
    Tang, Zhe
    Cai, Jian-Ming
    Tian, Ning
    Zhou, Juan
    Dong, Jing-Hui
    Liu, Yuan
    Bai, Xu
    Sheng, Fu-Geng
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2023, 47 (05) : 729 - 737
  • [9] Preoperative prediction of cavernous sinus invasion by pituitary adenomas using a radiomics method based on magnetic resonance images
    Jianxing Niu
    Shuaitong Zhang
    Shunchang Ma
    Jinfu Diao
    Wenjianlong Zhou
    Jie Tian
    Yali Zang
    Wang Jia
    European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 1625 - 1634
  • [10] A combined model integrating radiomics and deep learning based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for classification of brain metastases
    Zhang, Bo
    Zhu, Jinling
    Xu, Ruizhe
    Zou, Li
    Lian, Yixin
    Xie, Xin
    Tian, Ye
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2025, 66 (01) : 24 - 34