Sex-sorted bovine spermatozoa and DNA damage: I. Static features

被引:37
作者
Gosalvez, J. [1 ]
Ramirez, M. A. [1 ]
Lopez-Fernandez, C. [1 ]
Crespo, F. [2 ]
Evans, K. M. [3 ]
Kjelland, M. E. [3 ]
Moreno, J. F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Madrid UAM, Dept Biol, Unidad Genet, Madrid 28049, Spain
[2] FESCCR Minist Def, Ctr Mil Cria Caballar Avila, Avila, Spain
[3] Sexing Technol, Navasota, TX 77868 USA
关键词
Bovine reproduction; Anthology; Flow cytometry; Sex-sorting; Sperm DNA fragmentation; CHROMATIN-STRUCTURE; MAMMALIAN SPERM; BULL; SEMEN; FRAGMENTATION; FERTILITY; VIABILITY; INSEMINATION; INTEGRITY; HEIFERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.08.006
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This study examined the static response of Spermatozoa DNA Fragmentation (SDF) after sex selection in bulls using a MoFlo (R) SX (Beckman Coulter, Miami FL) spermatozoa sorter to produce three different subpopulations: 1) Spermatozoa bearing X-chromosomes with a purity of 95%, 2) Spermatozoa bearing Y-chromosomes with a purity of 95%, and 3) non-viable spermatozoa. The static response of SDF refers to the baseline values observed for DNA damage when analyzed pre- and post sex-sorting. Results showed that while the baseline level SDF in pre-sorted bull spermatozoa samples ranged from 5.3% to 11% with an average of 7.9% +/- 2.1%, the level of SDF obtained in X- and Y-chromosome sorted samples was much lower (3.1% +/- 1.9%) and statistical differences were obtained after comparing both groups (P < 0.01). Spermatozoa containing a fragmented DNA molecule tend to be accumulated in the non-viable subpopulation. The baseline SDF level in X- and Y-chromosome sorted subpopulations is reduced, by 63% on average when compared to the values obtained in the neat semen sample. Different bulls exhibit unique SDF reduction efficiencies via the X- and Y-chromosome sex selection process. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 205
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Fertility in heifers and cows after low dose insemination with sex-sorted and non-sorted sperm under field conditions
    Bodmer, M
    Janett, F
    Hässig, M
    den Daas, N
    Reichert, P
    Thun, R
    [J]. THERIOGENOLOGY, 2005, 64 (07) : 1647 - 1655
  • [2] DNA integrity in sexed bull sperm assessed by neutral Comet assay and sperm chromatin structure assay
    Boe-Hansen, GB
    Morris, ID
    Ersboll, AK
    Greve, T
    Christensen, P
    [J]. THERIOGENOLOGY, 2005, 63 (06) : 1789 - 1802
  • [3] The aetiology of sperm protamine abnormalities and their potential impact on the sperm epigenome
    Carrell, Douglas T.
    Emery, Benjamin R.
    Hammoud, Sue
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2008, 31 (06): : 537 - 545
  • [4] Viability and DNA fragmentation in differently sorted boar spermatozoa
    De Ambrogi, M.
    Spinaci, M.
    Galeati, G.
    Tamanini, C.
    [J]. THERIOGENOLOGY, 2006, 66 (08) : 1994 - 2000
  • [5] HYDRODYNAMIC ORIENTATION OF SPERM HEADS FOR FLOW CYTOMETRY
    DEAN, PN
    PINKEL, D
    MENDELSOHN, ML
    [J]. BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1978, 23 (01) : 7 - 13
  • [6] Effect of sex-sorted sperm dosage on conception rates in Holstein heifers and lactating cows
    DeJarnette, J. M.
    Nebel, R. L.
    Marshall, C. E.
    Moreno, J. F.
    McCleary, C. R.
    Lenz, R. W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2008, 91 (05) : 1778 - 1785
  • [7] Preservation and artificial insemination of sexed semen in sheep
    Evans, G
    Hollinshead, FK
    Maxwell, WMC
    [J]. REPRODUCTION FERTILITY AND DEVELOPMENT, 2004, 16 (04) : 455 - 464
  • [8] Simple determination of human sperm DNA fragmentation with an improved sperm chromatin dispersion test
    Fernández, JL
    Muriel, L
    Goyanes, V
    Segrelles, E
    Gosálvez, J
    Enciso, M
    LaFromboise, M
    De Jonge, C
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 84 (04) : 833 - 842
  • [9] Fernández JL, 2009, ARCH MED SCI, V5, pS55
  • [10] What affects fertility of sexed bull semen more, low sperm dosage or the sorting process?
    Frijters, A. C. J.
    Mullaart, E.
    Roelof, R. M. G.
    van Hoorne, R. P.
    Moreno, J. F.
    Moreno, O.
    Merton, J. S.
    [J]. THERIOGENOLOGY, 2009, 71 (01) : 64 - 67