Corporate social responsibility strategy and corporate environmental and social performance: The moderating role of board gender diversity

被引:240
作者
Orazalin, Nurlan [1 ]
Baydauletov, Mady [2 ]
机构
[1] KIMEP Univ, Bang Coll Business, Alma Ata, Kazakhstan
[2] Al Farabi Kazakh Natl Univ, Higher Sch Econ & Business, Alma Ata, Kazakhstan
关键词
board gender diversity; corporate governance; corporate social responsibility strategy; environmental performance; social performance; sustainable development; SUSTAINABILITY PERFORMANCE; UPPER ECHELONS; GOVERNANCE; IMPACT; DISCLOSURE; MANAGEMENT; DIRECTORS; WOMEN; BUSINESS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1002/csr.1915
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Drawing on upper echelons and resource dependence theories and using data of European listed companies over the period 2009-2016, we examine the effects of corporate social responsibility (CSR) strategy and board gender diversity on environmental and social performance. In particular, we investigate whether CSR strategy contributes to improving corporate environmental and social performance, and whether this relationship is moderated by board gender diversity. Our empirical findings suggest that firms with more effective CSR strategies exhibit better environmental and social performance. The results also show that board gender diversity is positively associated with environmental and social performance, thus supporting the notion that board gender diversity promotes sustainable development. Furthermore, the findings reveal that the positive relationship between CSR strategy and environmental performance is negatively moderated by board gender diversity. Finally, the results show that that national governance quality and firm size are important underlying factors affecting corporate environmental and social performance.
引用
收藏
页码:1664 / 1676
页数:13
相关论文
共 90 条
[31]   Does board gender diversity improve the informativeness of stock prices? [J].
Gul, Ferdinand A. ;
Srinidhi, Bin ;
Ng, Anthony C. .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2011, 51 (03) :314-338
[32]   When Is There a Sustainability Case for CSR? Pathways to Environmental and Social Performance Improvements [J].
Halme, Minna ;
Rintamaki, Jukka ;
Knudsen, Jette Steen ;
Lankoski, Leena ;
Kuisma, Mika .
BUSINESS & SOCIETY, 2020, 59 (06) :1181-1227
[33]   UPPER ECHELONS - THE ORGANIZATION AS A REFLECTION OF ITS TOP MANAGERS [J].
HAMBRICK, DC ;
MASON, PA .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1984, 9 (02) :193-206
[34]  
Hambrick DC, 2007, ACAD MANAGE REV, V32, P334, DOI 10.5465/AMR.2007.24345254
[35]   Environmental Policy, Sustainable Development, Governance Mechanisms and Environmental Performance [J].
Haque, Faizul ;
Ntim, Collins G. .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 27 (03) :415-435
[37]   National institutional antecedents to corporate environmental performance [J].
Hartmann, Julia ;
Uhlenbruck, Klaus .
JOURNAL OF WORLD BUSINESS, 2015, 50 (04) :729-741
[38]   Do Board's Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy and Orientation Influence Environmental Sustainability Disclosure? UK Evidence [J].
Helfaya, Akrum ;
Moussa, Tantawy .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 26 (08) :1061-1077
[39]   The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change [J].
Hillman, AJ ;
Cannella, AA ;
Paetzold, RL .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2000, 37 (02) :235-255
[40]   Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives [J].
Hillman, AJ ;
Dalziel, T .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2003, 28 (03) :383-396