Swinburne's apologetic strategy for theism evaluated

被引：0

作者：

Philipse, Herman ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Utrecht, Achter Dom 20, NL-3512 JP Utrecht, Netherlands

来源：

RELIGIOUS STUDIES | 2017年 / 53卷 / 03期

关键词：

GOD;

D O I：

10.1017/S0034412517000245

中图分类号：

B9 [宗教];

学科分类号：

010107 ;

摘要：

In this article, I classify Richard Swinburne's apologetic strategy for theism, and raise eight structural problems with regard to his Bayesian approach. For example, is theism really a meaningful theory? Does it have any predictive power? If so, isn't theism a degenerating research programme? Furthermore, is it legitimate to immunize theism against empirical refutations? Is Swinburne's tactic of doing so successful?

引用

页码：307 / 320

页数：14

共 18 条

[1]

Abraham W. J., 1997, COMPANION PHILOS REL, P584

[2]

[Anonymous], 2000, WARRANTED CHRISTIAN, DOI DOI 10.1093/0195131932.001.0001

[3]

[Anonymous], 2004, EXISTENCE GOD

[4]

[Anonymous], 2012, God in the Age of Science? A Critique of Religious Reason

[5]

[Anonymous], 1953, PHILOS UNTERSUCHUNGE

[6]

Cottingham John., 2014, Philosophy of Religion: Towards a More Humane Approach

[7]

Jackson PW, 2006, CHRONOLOGERS' QUEST: EPISODES IN THE SEARCH FOR THE AGE OF THE EARTH, P1, DOI 10.2277/ 0521813328

[8]

Kenny Anthony., 2004, UNKNOWN GOD AGNOSTIC

[9]

Lakatos Irme., 1998, Philosophy of Science: The Central Issues, P20

[10]

Mawson TJ, 2002, RELIG STUD, V38, P1

← 1 2 →