A novel empirical free energy function that explains and predicts protein-protein binding affinities

被引:51
作者
Audie, Joseph [1 ]
Scarlata, Suzanne [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Phys & Biophys, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
关键词
free energy; protein docking; desolvation; computational; regression; transfer free energies;
D O I
10.1016/j.bpc.2007.05.021
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
A free energy function can be defined as a mathematical expression that relates macroscopic free energy changes to microscopic or molecular properties. Free energy functions can be used to explain and predict the affinity of a ligand for a protein and to score and discriminate between native and non-native binding modes. However, there is a natural tension between developing a function fast enough to solve the scoring problem but rigorous enough to explain and predict binding affinities. Here, we present a novel, physics-based free energy function that is computationally inexpensive, yet explanatory and predictive. The function results from a derivation that assumes the cost of polar desolvation can be ignored and that includes a unique and implicit treatment of interfacial water-bridged interactions. The function was parameterized on an intemally consistent, high quality training set giving R-2 = 0.97 and Q(2) = 0.91. We used the function to blindly and successfully predict binding affinities for a diverse test set of 31 wild-type protein-protein and protein-peptide complexes (R-2 = 0.79, rmsd= 1.2 kcal mol(-1)). The function performed very well in direct comparison with a recently described knowledge-based potential and the function appears to be transferable. Our results indicate that our function is well suited for solving a wide range of protein/peptide design and discovery problems. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 211
页数:14
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
AJAY MMA, 1995, J MED CHEM, V38, P4953
[2]  
Åqvist J, 2001, COMB CHEM HIGH T SCR, V4, P613
[3]   In search of the energetic role of peptide hydrogen bonds [J].
Baldwin, RL .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 278 (20) :17581-17588
[4]   The Protein Data Bank and the challenge of structural genomics [J].
Berman, HM ;
Bhat, TN ;
Bourne, PE ;
Feng, ZK ;
Gilliland, G ;
Weissig, H ;
Westbrook, J .
NATURE STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2000, 7 (Suppl 11) :957-959
[5]   An analysis of conformational changes on protein-protein association: implications for predictive docking [J].
Betts, MJ ;
Sternberg, MJE .
PROTEIN ENGINEERING, 1999, 12 (04) :271-283
[6]   The effect of multiple binding modes on empirical modeling of ligand docking to proteins [J].
Brem, R ;
Dill, KA .
PROTEIN SCIENCE, 1999, 8 (05) :1134-1143
[7]   A protein-protein docking benchmark [J].
Chen, R ;
Mintseris, J ;
Janin, J ;
Weng, ZP .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND GENETICS, 2003, 52 (01) :88-91
[8]   CONTRIBUTION OF BURIED HYDROGEN-BONDS TO PROTEIN STABILITY - THE CRYSTAL-STRUCTURES OF 2 BARNASE MUTANTS [J].
CHEN, YW ;
FERSHT, AR ;
HENRICK, K .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1993, 234 (04) :1158-1170
[9]   Calculation of affinities of peptides for proteins [J].
Donnini, S ;
Juffer, AH .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 25 (03) :393-411
[10]   Bioactive peptides from libraries [J].
Falciani, C ;
Lozzi, L ;
Pini, A ;
Bracci, L .
CHEMISTRY & BIOLOGY, 2005, 12 (04) :417-426