Investigation of the Relationship among Fault Types, Focal Depths, and Ionospheric TEC Anomalies before Large Earthquakes between 2000 and 2020

被引:1
作者
Ulukavak, Mustafa [1 ]
Yalcinkaya, Mualla [2 ]
Kayikci, Emine Tanir [2 ]
Ozturk, Serkan [3 ]
Kandemir, Raif [4 ]
Karsli, Hakan [5 ]
机构
[1] Harran Univ, Engn Fac, Dept Geomat Engn, TR-63300 Sanliurfa, Turkey
[2] Karadeniz Tech Univ, Engn Fac, Dept Geomat Engn, TR-61080 Trabzon, Turkey
[3] Gumushane Univ, Dept Geophys Engn, Fac Engn & Nat Sci, TR-29100 Gumushane, Turkey
[4] Recep Tayyip Erdogan Univ, Fac Engn & Architecture, Dept Geol Engn, TR-53100 Rize, Turkey
[5] Karadeniz Tech Univ, Engn Fac, Dept Geophys Engn, TR-61080 Trabzon, Turkey
关键词
Ionospheric total electron content (TEC); Earthquakes; TEC-fault type; TEC-earthquake focal depth; Space weather conditions; TOTAL ELECTRON-CONTENT; GPS-TEC; STATISTICAL-ANALYSIS; PHYSICAL-MECHANISM; DISTURBANCES PRIOR; MAJOR EARTHQUAKES; GRAVITY-WAVES; DENSITY; M7.0+EARTHQUAKES; ATMOSPHERE;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000395
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In this study, the relationships between possible ionospheric total electron content (TEC) anomalies and earthquake focal depths and fault types were investigated using 3,099 global earthquakes with Mw >= 6.0 between 2000 and 2020. The relationship between the ionospheric TEC changes and earthquakes has been previously discussed in the literature. However, very few studies have examined the relationship between the focal depths and the fault types of these earthquakes. In general, three indices, namely the disturbance storm-time index (Dst), the planetary geomagnetic activity index (Kp), and the solar flux (F10.7), are used to characterize the space weather conditions (SWC) that affect TEC anomalies and to identify the active/quiet days for future earthquakes. In this study, 13 different indices were used: indices that measured solar activity included proton flux (Pf) at six different energy levels, F10.7, and extreme ultraviolet (EUV0.1-50 nm and EUV26-34 nm). Meanwhile, geomagnetic storm indices included Dst, Kp, the z-component of the magnetic field index (Bz), and proton density (P-d). By using the ionospheric TEC values derived from global ionosphere maps (GIM-TEC), both negative and positive ionospheric TEC anomalies were observed for 15 days before and 4 days after the earthquakes using a statistical analysis technique that involved a 15-day moving median. The earthquakes were grouped according to their fault types (normal, thrust, and strike-slip) and focal depths (shallow, intermediate, and deep). Their relationships with the negative and positive TEC anomalies in the quiet days before the earthquake were examined. Negative and positive anomalies were observed approximately 3-12 days before earthquakes that occurred on normal faults, approximately 5-8 days before earthquakes that occurred on thrust faults, and approximately 1-12 days before earthquakes that occurred on strike-slip faults. The average TEC anomaly changes were calculated to be 43.4% total electron content unit (TECU) for normal faults, 44.8% TECU for thrust faults, and 41.3% TECU for strike-slip faults. Positive anomaly values were exhibited by larger earthquakes on normal and thrust faults, whereas negative anomaly values tended to occur on strike-slip faults. Negative and positive TEC anomalies were detected around 3-12 days before shallow earthquakes, around 1-13 days before intermediate-depth earthquakes, and around 1-12 days before deep earthquakes. The average TEC anomaly changes were calculated to be 44.4% TECU for shallow earthquakes, 43.3% TECU for intermediate-depth earthquakes, and 42.6% TECU for deep earthquakes. Positive anomaly values were also found to be higher than the negative anomaly values in each group. We propose that there is a relationship between the ionospheric TEC anomalies that occur before large earthquakes and their fault types and focal depths. (C) 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]   TEC anomalies-Local TEC changes prior to earthquakes or TEC response to solar and geomagnetic activity changes? [J].
Afraimovich, Edward L. ;
Astafyeva, Elvira I. .
EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE, 2008, 60 (09) :961-966
[2]   Anomalous changes in ionospheric TEC during an earthquake event of 13-14 April 2010 in the Chinese sector [J].
Aggarwal, Malini .
ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2015, 56 (07) :1400-1412
[3]   Observed Ionospheric Effects of 23 October 2011 Van, Turkey Earthquake [J].
Arikan, Feza ;
Deviren, M. N. ;
Lenk, O. ;
Sezen, U. ;
Arikan, O. .
GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK, 2012, 3 (01) :1-8
[4]   Strike-slip earthquakes can also be detected in the ionosphere [J].
Astafyeva, Elvira ;
Rolland, Lucie M. ;
Sladen, Anthony .
EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 2014, 405 :180-193
[5]   Dependence of waveform of near-field coseismic ionospheric disturbances on focal mechanisms [J].
Astafyeva, Elvira ;
Heki, Kosuke .
EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE, 2009, 61 (07) :939-943
[6]   Changed Relation between Solar 10.7-cm Radio Flux and some Activity Indices which describe the Radiation at Different Altitudes of Atmosphere during Cycles 21-23 [J].
Bruevich, E. A. ;
Bruevich, V. V. ;
Yakunina, G. V. .
JOURNAL OF ASTROPHYSICS AND ASTRONOMY, 2014, 35 (01) :1-15
[7]   Ionospheric disturbances of the 2007 Bengkulu and the 2005 Nias earthquakes, Sumatra, observed with a regional GPS network [J].
Cahyadi, Mokhamad Nur ;
Heki, K. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2013, 118 (04) :1777-1787
[8]   GPS DETECTION OF IONOSPHERIC PERTURBATIONS FOLLOWING THE JANUARY 17, 1994, NORTHRIDGE EARTHQUAKE [J].
CALAIS, E ;
MINSTER, JB .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1995, 22 (09) :1045-1048
[9]   Total electron content variations over southern Europe before and during the M 6.3 Abruzzo earthquake of April 6, 2009 [J].
Contadakis, Michael E. ;
Arabelos, Dimitrios N. ;
Pikridas, Christos ;
Spatalas, Spyrous D. .
ANNALS OF GEOPHYSICS, 2012, 55 (01) :83-93
[10]   IONOSPHERIC EFFECTS OBSERVED AROUND TIME OF ALASKAN EARTHQUAKE OF MARCH 28 1964 [J].
DAVIES, K ;
BAKER, DM .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1965, 70 (09) :2251-+