Predictors and consequences of multiple persistent postmastectomy pains

被引:74
作者
Kudel, Ian [1 ]
Edwards, Robert R. [1 ]
Kozachik, Sharon [3 ]
Block, Brian M. [2 ]
Agarwal, Shefali [3 ]
Heinberg, Leslie J. [4 ]
Haythornthwaite, Jennifer [1 ]
Raja, Srinivasa N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Nursing, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Div Publ Hlth, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
pain; mastectomy;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.01.013
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Persistent postmastectomy pain is quite common and has been classified into several distinct types. Few studies, however, have investigated either the predictors or functional impact of multiple types of post mastectomy pain. In this investigation, 278 women, who were, on average, several years post mastectomy, completed questionnaires assessing pain, pain-related physical function, and psychosocial distress. We assessed three distinct categories of postmastectomy pain: phantom breast pain, scar pain, and other mastectomy-related pain. Each of the three types of postmastectomy pain was strongly related to one another (i.e., women reporting one type of pain were more likely to report the other types as well). In general, the more types of postmastectomy pain a woman reported, the greater the degree of disability and distress. Collectively, the presence of "other mastectomy-related pain" was a stronger unique predictor of disability and distress than were the other two categories of pain. Interestingly, demographic and surgical factors, including time since surgery, were not consistent predictors of pain or function. The findings suggest that the assessment of postmastectomy pain should include formal evaluation of multiple types of pain, with additional attention paid to the category of "other mastectomy-related pains, " and that the number of types of pain reported by women after surgery may be important in predicting functional outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:619 / 627
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Making sense of everyday pain [J].
Aldrich, S ;
Eccleston, C .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2000, 50 (11) :1631-1641
[2]   Pain after quadrantectorny and radiotherapy for early-stage breast cancer: Incidence, characteristics and influence on quality of life - Results from a retrospective study [J].
Amichetti, M ;
Caffo, O .
ONCOLOGY, 2003, 65 (01) :23-28
[3]   Rheumatoid symptoms following breast cancer treatment: A controlled comparison [J].
Andrykowski, MA ;
Curran, SL ;
Carpenter, JS ;
Studts, JL ;
Cunningham, L ;
McGrath, PC ;
Sloan, DA ;
Kenady, DE .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1999, 18 (02) :85-94
[4]   Somatic symptom reporting in women and men [J].
Barsky, AJ ;
Peekna, HM ;
Borus, JF .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 16 (04) :266-275
[5]   Quantitative assessment of chronic postsurgical pain using the McGill Pain Questionnaire [J].
Bruce, J ;
Poobalan, AS ;
Smith, WCS ;
Chambers, WA .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2004, 20 (02) :70-75
[6]   Pain and quality of life after surgery for breast cancer [J].
Caffo, O ;
Amichetti, M ;
Ferro, A ;
Lucenti, A ;
Valduga, F ;
Galligioni, E .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2003, 80 (01) :39-48
[7]  
Carpenter J S, 1999, Oncol Nurs Forum, V26, P1311
[8]   Postmastectomy/postlumpectomy pain in breast cancer survivors [J].
Carpenter, JS ;
Andrykowski, MA ;
Sloan, P ;
Cunningham, L ;
Cordova, MJ ;
Studts, JL ;
McGrath, PC ;
Sloan, D ;
Kenady, DE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 51 (12) :1285-1292
[9]   THE PAIN DISABILITY INDEX - FACTOR STRUCTURE AND NORMATIVE DATA [J].
CHIBNALL, JT ;
TAIT, RC .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1994, 75 (10) :1082-1086
[10]   A HIGH-RISK METHOD FOR STUDYING PSYCHOSOCIAL ANTECEDENTS OF CHRONIC PAIN - THE PROSPECTIVE INVESTIGATION OF HERPES-ZOSTER [J].
DWORKIN, RH ;
HARTSTEIN, G ;
ROSNER, HL ;
WALTHER, RR ;
SWEENEY, EW ;
BRAND, L .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 101 (01) :200-205