Facing up to the paradigm of ecological intensification in agronomy: Revisiting methods, concepts and knowledge

被引:304
作者
Dore, Thierry [1 ]
Makowski, David [1 ]
Malezieux, Eric [2 ]
Munier-Jolain, Nathalie [3 ]
Tchamitchian, Marc [4 ]
Tittonell, Pablo [5 ]
机构
[1] AgroParisTech, INRA, UMR 211, F-78850 Thiverval Grignon, France
[2] CIRAD, UR HortSys, F-34398 Montpellier, France
[3] INRA, UMR Genet & Ecophysiol Legumineuses 102, F-21065 Dijon, France
[4] INRA, Unite Ecodev, Ctr PACA, F-84914 Avignon 9, France
[5] CIRAD Persyst, F-34898 Montpellier 5, France
关键词
Agroecology; Agroecosystem; Plant science; Farmers' knowledge; Meta-analysis; Comparative analysis; MODELING CANOPY PHOTOSYNTHESIS; FARMERS KNOWLEDGE; FARMING SYSTEMS; ORGANIC AGRICULTURE; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; EXPERT KNOWLEDGE; GLOBAL RADIATION; DIRECT COMPONENT; NATURAL SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.eja.2011.02.006
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Agriculture is facing up to an increasing number of challenges, including the need to ensure various ecosystem services and to resolve apparent conflicts between them. One of the ways forward for agriculture currently being debated is a set of principles grouped together under the umbrella term "ecological intensification". In published studies, ecological intensification has generally been considered to be based essentially on the use of biological regulation to manage agroecosystems, at field, farm and landscape scales. We propose here five additional avenues that agronomic research could follow to strengthen the ecological intensification of current farming systems. We begin by assuming that progress in plant sciences over the last two decades provides new insight of potential use to agronomists. Potentially useful new developments in plant science include advances in the fields of energy conversion by plants, nitrogen use efficiency and defence mechanisms against pests. We then suggest that natural ecosystems may also provide sources of inspiration for cropping system design, in terms of their structure and function on the one hand, and farmers' knowledge on the other. Natural ecosystems display a number of interesting properties that could be incorporated into agroecosystems. We discuss the value and limitations of attempting to 'mimic' their structure and function, while considering the differences in objectives and constraints between these two types of system. Farmers develop extensive knowledge of the systems they manage. We discuss ways in which this knowledge could be combined with, or fed into scientific knowledge and innovation, and the extent to which this is likely to be possible. The two remaining avenues concern methods. We suggest that agronomists make more use of meta-analysis and comparative system studies, these two types of methods being commonly used in other disciplines but barely used in agronomy. Meta-analysis would make it possible to quantify variations of cropping system performances in interaction with soil and climate conditions more accurately across environments and socio-economic contexts. Comparative analysis would help to identify the structural characteristics of cropping and farming systems underlying properties of interest. Such analysis can be performed with sets of performance indicators and methods borrowed from ecology for analyses of the structure and organisation of these systems. These five approaches should make it possible to deepen our knowledge of agroecosystems for action. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 210
页数:14
相关论文
共 178 条
[1]   Ecological sustainability evaluation of traditional management in different vineyard systems in Berisso, Argentina [J].
Abbona, Esteban A. ;
Sarandon, Santiago J. ;
Marasas, Mariana E. ;
Astier, Marta .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 119 (3-4) :335-345
[2]   Tag-encoded pyrosequencing analysis of bacterial diversity in a single soil type as affected by management and land use [J].
Acosta-Martinez, V. ;
Dowd, S. ;
Sun, Y. ;
Allen, V. .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2008, 40 (11) :2762-2770
[3]   Interspecific competition in natural plant communities: mechanisms, trade-offs and plant-soil feedbacks [J].
Aerts, R .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 1999, 50 (330) :29-37
[4]   Constraints to farmers' adoption of direct-seeding mulch-based cropping systems: A farm scale modeling approach applied to the mountainous slopes of Vietnam [J].
Affholder, Francois ;
Jourdain, Damien ;
Dang Dinh Quang ;
Tuong, To Phuc ;
Morize, Marion ;
Ricome, Aymeric .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2010, 103 (01) :51-62
[5]   A logic programming framework for possibilistic argumentation:: Formalization and logical properties [J].
Alsinet, Teresa ;
Chesnevar, Carlos I. ;
Godo, Lluis ;
Simari, Guillermo R. .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2008, 159 (10) :1208-1228
[7]   The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems [J].
Altieri, MA .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 74 (1-3) :19-31
[8]  
Altieri Miguel A., 2002, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, V93, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0167-8809(02)00085-3
[9]   An argumentation framework for merging conflicting knowledge bases [J].
Amgoud, Leila ;
Kaci, Souhila .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2007, 45 (02) :321-340
[10]   Using arguments for making and explaining decisions [J].
Amgoud, Leila ;
Prade, Henri .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2009, 173 (3-4) :413-436